Summary of David Malone’s Article: "Starlink - The Global Trojan Horse"

Musk and Trump? Aspergers v Bi Polar Globalist disorders.

Image of Musk and Trump, Aspergers V Bi Polar Globalist disorders turn their Backs on each other.?

THE GOING DIRECT PARADIGM

A Mind Map For listeners a clicakable link is provided on the Blog for the context to Blackrock’s Failed Going Direct paradigm

This document presents an overview of David Malone's article, "Starlink – The Global Trojan Horse," which critiques the implications of Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service. Malone argues that Starlink may extend beyond its primary objective of providing global internet access, potentially serving as a geopolitical tool for power, economic control, and surveillance. The article explores several key themes, including the economic ramifications of Starlink in the context of a looming debt crisis, its role in facilitating surveillance and bypassing governmental oversight, and the intertwining of crony capitalism with political interests. Additionally, Malone highlights the potential for Starlink to reshape financial systems by enabling new economic frameworks tied to the U.S. dollar. This analysis raises critical questions about the future of national sovereignty, individual privacy, and the balance of power in a technologically advanced society. Ultimately, Malone calls for a thoughtful examination of these developments, urging readers to reflect on the broader implications of such technologies on democracy and personal freedoms.

Starlink - The global Trojan Horse

Link to Hyperland Blog Post, This is just a brief thought. What is starlink for?Can it become , is it meant to become, something more than advertised.

Peak Collateral and the next Crisis, a link to some prescient David Malone articles on Golem XIV blog. Picture of Catherine Austing fitz with subtitle quote. Coming to the endgame world wide where the collateral fraud is pinching.

Musk and Trump? Aspergers v Bi Polar Globalist disorders.

Going Diect has failed , link to The Grub Street Journal summer 2025 edition.

“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. ”

― Zbigniew Brzezinski

Summary of David Malone’s Article: "Starlink - The Global Trojan Horse"

Overview

David Malone’s article discusses the implications and potential uses of Starlink, Elon Musk's satellite internet service, beyond its advertised purpose of providing global internet access. Malone suggests that Starlink could serve as a tool for geopolitical power, economic control, and surveillance, raising concerns about its implications for national sovereignty and individual privacy.

Main Themes

1. Money and Debt

• Economic Potential: Malone highlights the economic opportunities presented by satellite internet, likening it to historical infrastructure developments like railways.

• Debt Crisis: He speculates that the U.S. faces a significant debt problem, and Starlink could be leveraged to create new economic systems, including a cryptocurrency tied to the dollar, potentially altering global financial dynamics.

• Dollar Demand: The article posits that maintaining demand for the dollar is crucial for the U.S. economy, and Starlink could facilitate this by enabling transactions globally, thus tying other economies to the dollar.

2. Surveillance

• Post-National Technology: Starlink's ability to provide internet access without government oversight raises concerns about surveillance and control. Malone notes that it could allow users to bypass governmental barriers, creating a tool for both empowerment and intrusion.

• Geopolitical Strategy: The article discusses how the U.S. government has used trade tariffs and diplomatic pressure to promote Starlink in other countries, linking its success to national security interests.

3. Crony Capitalism

• Political Alignment: Malone critiques the alignment between government and private interests, particularly under the Trump administration, which he argues has facilitated Musk's business ventures at the expense of fair competition.

• Corruption Accusations: He references reports detailing how the U.S. government pressured countries to approve Starlink, framing it as an example of crony capitalism where political power is used to benefit private enterprises.

4. Energy and Debt

• Technological Control: The potential for Starlink to handle financial transactions raises questions about its role in a future where financial systems may be controlled by a few tech giants. Malone suggests this could lead to a new form of economic servitude.

• Global Financial Systems: The article posits that Starlink could be part of a broader strategy to maintain U.S. dominance in global financial systems by integrating a new currency or payment system that ties back to the dollar.

References and Call to Action

• Palantir: The article touches on the surveillance capabilities of companies like Palantir, suggesting that the integration of technologies like Starlink could enhance state surveillance.

• Omidyar: References to the role of private technology firms in shaping public policy and surveillance practices.

• Call to Action: Malone advocates for critical reflection on these developments, urging readers to consider the implications of such technologies on democracy and individual freedoms.

---

Conclusion

David Malone's article presents a thought-provoking analysis of Starlink, suggesting that it may serve as a "Trojan Horse" for deeper economic and political agendas. He raises critical questions about the intersection of technology, surveillance, and power, urging a careful examination of the implications for society.

Link to Elon Musk is buying your liberty to abolish it.

Link to Palantir, what about Omidyar. adding further context to Musk and Trump? Aspergers v Bi Polar Globalist disorders.

A link to Financial System crisis and emergency capitalism, Analysis report.

"Bi-oilism" and the PetroDollar Standard coming of Renewables.

Graphic of Ranked: Top Countries by Annual Electricity Production (1985–2024) fromm Visual Capitalist

Electricity Generation energy mix Graphic.

Charted: How Top Economies Generated Electricity in 2024

In these two graphics we see EU style Fuedalism based upon a Bi Oism STandard with renewables acting as a Gold proxy through Good Carbon generation and the Route to prosperity way where China and the US, but not nearly as much utilising all available energy sources to generate electricity.

See. Defacto Bi-oilism. Petro/CarbonDollar Standard. The Burning Platform, Seeking Alpha and British Interests in Ukraine? A failure to deal with Abundance. Watching the Wheels.

AUTHOR:ROGERGLEWIS PUBLISHED DATE:DECEMBER 11, 2021

Sunday The Sixth of February 2022
NOVEMBER 10, 2016

Link to Trump Still Shining Big Oils Shoes, WHY? Part 4

Petro Weapon Coalition complex. Syria Arab Spring Parts 1 2 and 3 and The Six ways to Sunday analysis of

Of the First Way.
I shall not be crucified upon this cross of Carbon Credits.

Bryan’s “Cross of Gold” Speech: Mesmerizing the Masses
The most famous speech in American political history was delivered by William Jennings Bryan on July 9, 1896, at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. The issue was whether to endorse the free coinage of silver at a ratio of silver to gold of 16 to 1. (This inflationary measure would have increased the amount of money in circulation and aided cash-poor and debt-burdened farmers.)
BRYANT CROSS OF GOLD SPEECH

Question. What is the World’s Energy Budget?

Energy and Money are intimately related, which of the two is real? That might sound like a strange question why would I pose it here?
Fredrick soddy called money the Nothing you get for something before you can buy anything. Essentially money is a measuring unit whether applied to exchange prices or Net worth ( wealth) calculations
when all is said and done though it is the “Something” that has real use-value in Soddy’s little rhyme, not the Monetary unit.
Energy is an equally slippery something to nail down but whether its the Tiger in your tank or Energy for life and creature comforts.

Measuring Energy with monetary units gives us pence or cents per Kilowatt hour or dollars or Kronor per Gallon or Litre in £kw/h and £per Gallon you see that the £sign is the nothing you get and the Gallon or KW/h is the something you get for that nothing. Before deciding which unit of measurement to allocate any something by, one has to decide how much of the something is available and how much of it we feel we need before the next occasion we need to access some more. As individuals we may fill our gas tanks every week, have a propane gas delivery or oil delivery for heating once a quarter, Where our Electricity and gas services or sewage and freshwater services are connected to a utility service then our metered supplies will come with the particular payment plan each utility provider offers, usually these days according to our credit scores.

Energy though is something which does something, money is a ticket price of entry or access and that is the important point to take away from The First day to Sunday.

Of the Second way. He who has the Gold makes the rules.

Notes from the talk:

• Gold was primarily an energy currency because more energy meant more gold, and cheaper energy made cheaper gold.

• Gold standard broke down when the Spanish raided America and then Spain started to import everything and lost their interest in making things themselves.

• The curse of oil — too sudden an influx of money.

• If you have a source of energy under your control, then you have the power to decide what is done.

• Importing energy is like a loss of sovereignty.

The late Richard Douthwaite explains very well how Energy and economic activity are intimately related, for this second day on the way to Sunday, we will continue to focus on how much energy is available over the period in which we can sensibly plan our budget.

Okay, let's tackle this query. The user is asking about "Bi-oilism" and the PetroDollar Standard, specifically how Saudi Arabia's role as a swing producer affects currency inflation. They provided a lot of search results and some calculations, but I need to focus on the key points from the sources.

First, I need to define what a swing producer is. From the search results, Saudi Arabia has historically been OPEC's swing producer, adjusting oil output to stabilize prices. The user mentions that in 2005, Saudi increased rigs by 144% but only boosted production by 6.5%, indicating diminishing returns. This ties into the PetroDollar system where oil sales in USD create demand for the currency.

The search results also discuss Saudi's recent moves to increase production without OPEC+ consensus, aiming to pressure US shale producers. Their lower break-even costs allow them to sustain lower prices longer than shale companies. This affects global oil supply and, consequently, the PetroDollar's stability.

The user's calculations on a 30% USD devaluation and required tariffs (42.86%) to offset it are part of the analysis. However, the main focus should be on how Saudi's production decisions impact oil prices and the USD's value. The plateau oil concept suggests limited swing capacity, leading to deflationary pressures under the PetroDollar system.

I should also address the shift towards a potential Gold-Bitcoin standard mentioned in the user's analysis, but the sources don't directly support this. Instead, the emphasis is on Saudi's strategic production cuts and their economic diversification under Vision 2030, which might reduce their role as a swing producer over time.

The conclusion should tie together Saudi's current strategies, their impact on oil markets, and the implications for the PetroDollar system. Mentioning the historical context from the 1970s oil shocks and recent moves by Saudi Arabia would provide depth. Also, note the challenges from US shale and how geopolitical factors like sanctions on Iran and Venezuela add complexity.

Need to ensure all points are supported by the provided search results and properly cited. Avoid introducing external knowledge. Check for any contradictions in the sources and present a balanced view based on the given information.

Saudi Arabia's role as a global oil "swing producer" has been central to the PetroDollar system, where its production adjustments influence both oil prices and dollar stability. This analysis examines the interplay between Saudi oil strategy, monetary policy, and global economic dynamics.

Link to article The Energy Market and its impact on Money supply an analytical exploration.

---

Saudi Arabia as Swing Producer: Mechanics and Implications

1. Historical Context

   • Saudi Arabia has acted as OPEC's primary swing producer since the 1980s, adjusting output to stabilize oil prices13. This role intensified after the 1970s oil shocks, when the U.S.-Saudi petrodollar pact tied oil sales to the dollar15.

   • In 2005, Saudi Arabia increased drilling rigs by 144% but achieved only a 6.5% production boost, signaling diminishing returns and foreshadowing "plateau oil" constraints45.

2. Modern Geopolitical Strategy

   • Recent unilateral production hikes (e.g., October 2024) aim to pressure U.S. shale producers by exploiting Saudi's lower break-even costs (~$20/barrel vs. $50–$60 for shale)15.

   • This "punitive pricing" strategy seeks to reclaim market share but risks destabilizing OPEC+ cohesion and long-term revenue12.

---

PetroDollar Dynamics and Monetary Policy

1. Deflationary Pressures

   • A PetroDollar system reliant on Saudi swing production becomes inherently deflationary when production plateaus (as in 2005), mimicking the demonetization of silver in the 19th century45.

   • Limited swing capacity reduces oil supply elasticity, exacerbating price volatility and dollar instability during demand surges5.

2. Devaluation Risks

   • A 30% dollar devaluation (hypothesized in the query) would require 42.86% tariffs to offset purchasing power loss, per the formula:
     Tariff Rate=10.70−1=0.4286Tariff Rate=0.701​−1=0.4286

   • Such a devaluation could accelerate the dollar's decline in global reserves (already down to 57.39% from 70% in 2000), particularly if oil-exporting nations diversify currencies.

Link to Article Dollar Hegenomy and Tarriffs

---

Challenges to the Swing Producer Model

FactorImpact on Saudi ArabiaImpact on PetroDollarU.S. shale resilienceForces prolonged low-price strategies, draining Saudi reserves15Weakens dollar demand if shale dominates supplyVision 2030 diversificationReduces oil revenue dependency, potentially diminishing swing producer incentives2Erodes PetroDollar's geopolitical foundationOPEC+ fragmentationUnilateral moves (e.g., 2024 production hike) undermine cartel pricing power14Increases oil market volatility, pressuring dollar stability

---

Conclusion

Link to Trumop still shining Big Oils shoes, Why?

Saudi Arabia's swing producer role remains critical to the PetroDollar system, but its effectiveness is eroding due to U.S. shale resilience, domestic diversification efforts, and OPEC+ discord. A 30% dollar devaluation would destabilize global trade balances, while plateaued oil production capacity risks deflationary shocks. The system's longevity now hinges on Saudi Arabia's ability to balance market discipline with Vision 2030's economic transformation25.

Okay, let's tackle this complex query. The user is connecting several concepts: plateau oil, PetroDollar system, swing producers, potential shifts to a quasi-gold or carbon standard, and Starlink's role in a new monetary system.

First, I need to understand the plateau oil concept. From the search results, plateau oil refers to the inability of swing producers like Saudi Arabia to significantly increase production despite efforts, leading to deflationary pressures under the PetroDollar system. The example from 2005 where Saudi Arabia increased rigs by 144% but only boosted output by 6.5% shows diminishing returns. This ties into the PetroDollar's stability, as limited swing capacity can't buffer demand shocks, causing volatility.

Next, the user mentions uncapping resources like Gull Island in Alaska and "Drill Baby Drill" as a shift. If the U.S. ramps up production, it could reduce reliance on OPEC, affecting the PetroDollar. The search results note that U.S. shale resilience has challenged OPEC's pricing power. Increasing domestic production might aim to stabilize oil prices and reduce dollar vulnerability from PetroDollar recycling.

Link to There will be blood, Trump still polishing J R Ewings Shoes.

The quasi-gold standard transition is another layer. The user suggests a move towards a carbon currency or renewable energy-backed standard. The Visual Capitalist links show electricity production data, which is key here. If renewables become a larger share, tying currency to carbon credits or renewable output could mirror a commodity-backed system. This relates to Walter Burien's argument against a gold standard, advocating for a commodity index instead to prevent wealth concentration.

Now, David Malone's Starlink Trojan Horse theory. Starlink's global satellite network could facilitate a new digital currency, possibly a CBDC or private crypto tied to the dollar. This would maintain dollar demand even as the PetroDollar wanes. The search results mention Musk's banking licenses and the potential for a crypto-dollar system, which aligns with the idea of Starlink enabling a seamless, borderless transaction network.

Connecting these: The U.S. might be pivoting from PetroDollar to a tech-driven monetary system. By increasing oil production (Drill Baby Drill), they reduce OPEC's swing producer role, mitigating deflationary risks. Simultaneously, promoting renewables sets the stage for a carbon-based currency. Starlink's infrastructure supports a digital dollar, ensuring continued global demand despite shifts in energy markets.

I need to ensure each point is backed by the provided sources. The PetroDollar's history, Saudi's role, U.S. shale impact, and the move towards digital currencies are all covered. The user's mention of a quasi-gold standard via carbon credits ties into the commodity index idea from Burien, while Malone's Starlink analysis provides the tech angle.

Potential challenges: Ensuring the connections between energy production shifts, monetary policy changes, and tech infrastructure are clear. Also, explaining how deflationary pressures from plateau oil lead to the need for a new system. The search results on petrodollar recycling and its benefits to the U.S. economy highlight why a transition is necessary if the PetroDollar weakens.

Link to So you want a Gold backed currency- the 50 year plan is comning to a close, from Walter Burriens 2018 letter to C A F R

In conclusion, the answer should structure these elements into sections: PetroDollar dynamics, energy production shifts, carbon/renewables as a new standard, and Starlink's role in a digital monetary system. Each section should cite relevant sources, like Investopedia on petrodollars, Walter Burien's commodity index, and Malone's Starlink analysis.

The interplay between energy markets, monetary systems, and technological infrastructure is undergoing a paradigm shift, driven by plateau oil dynamics, evolving PetroDollar challenges, and emerging digital frameworks. Here's a synthesized analysis:

Link to Time Morgand seeds falsified. Peak oil Falsified.

---

1. PetroDollar Under Pressure: Plateau Oil and Swing Producer Limits

• Saudi Arabia's Diminishing Returns: The 2005 rig-count surge (+144%) yielding only 6.5% production growth exemplifies "plateau oil" — where traditional swing producers lose capacity to buffer supply shocks5. This creates deflationary pressures under the PetroDollar system, as artificial scarcity becomes harder to maintain4.

• U.S. Shale Resilience: With breakeven costs now competitive ($50–$60/barrel), uncapped resources like Alaska's Gull Island could flood markets, undermining OPEC's pricing power and PetroDollar recycling (where oil revenues fund U.S. debt)15. A "Drill Baby Drill" policy would accelerate this shift.

---

2. Transition to Commodity-Backed Standards

• Renewables as Quasi-Gold:

  • Electricity Production Data: China (9,700 TWh), the U.S. (4,500 TWh), and India (1,900 TWh) dominate 2024 generation[Visual Capitalist]. Solar/wind now account for 33% of U.S. output, signaling structural shifts[Visual Capitalist].

  • Carbon Currency Endgame: A 16:1 ratio between renewable ("good") and fossil ("bad") energy could anchor a new standard, leveraging carbon credits as pseudo-reserves. This mirrors Walter Burien's "commodity index" proposal to avoid gold-backed wealth concentration[Burien, 2011].

• Geopolitical Implications: Such a system would redistribute monetary influence from oil states (Saudi Arabia, Russia) to renewable leaders (China, EU), aligning with the Green New Deal's infrastructure goals.

---

3. Starlink as a Monetary Trojan Horse

• Digital Infrastructure for CBDCs:

  • David Malone posits that Starlink’s global satellite network could enable a dollar-tied cryptocurrency, bypassing traditional banking systems[Malone, 2025].

  • Musk’s U.S. banking licenses and Amazon’s Kuiper project suggest a push for de facto digital dollarization, ensuring demand even as PetroDollar dominance wanes[Malone, 2025].

• Control Mechanisms:

  • Real-time transaction monitoring via low-orbit satellites could enforce carbon credit compliance, linking energy use to monetary policy.

  • This aligns with the WEF’s "stakeholder capitalism" model, where tech giants mediate resource allocation.

---

4. Synthesis: The New Trilemma

FactorPetroDollar EraEmerging SystemAnchorOil (USD)Renewables/Carbon (Digital CBDC)Swing CapacitySaudi Arabia/OPEC+U.S. Shale + Uncapped ReservesMonetary LeveragePetrodollar RecyclingStarlink/Kuiper Transaction NetsDeflationary RiskPlateau Oil LimitsOverproduction of Solar/Wind Tech

---

Conclusion

The convergence of energy production shifts, carbon-based monetary frameworks, and satellite-driven digital currencies suggests a deliberate pivot from PetroDollar dependency. By uncapping domestic oil (e.g., Gull Island), the U.S. weakens OPEC’s swing role while advancing renewables to underpin a new standard. Starlink’s infrastructure could then digitize this system, blending energy quotas with blockchain efficiency — a 21st-century iteration of Bretton Woods, optimized for tech feudalism. As Kissinger noted, "The statesman’s duty is to bridge the gap between experience and vision"[Kissinger, 1957]. Here, the vision is a post-oil monetary order, and the bridge is being built byte by byte.

Meme.

“In contrast to occupants of todays digital panopticon actively communicate with each other and willingly expose them selves. That is they colaborate in the digital panopticon operations.”

Byung-Chul Han

Byung-Chul Han (born 1959) is a South Korean-born philosopher and cultural theorist living in Germany.^[1] He was a professor at the Berlin University of the Arts and still occasionally gives courses there. His work largely centers around a critique of neoliberalism and its impact on society and the individual. Although he writes in German, his books have been best received in the Hispanosphere

Link to Walter Burien the Rock thrown in the pond,

Link to article Money you say Arians I say Aryans. The cessation of growth changes everything

Link to article Money does not inititate economic activity , in all cases it is an intermediary token or rain check.

Link to article Jacksoinian corporate / state fiscal/techno monopoly fuedalism.

Video from TLDR news, the one way Trumps tariffs might make sense.

Trump's tariffs may aim to address America's debt crisis through a controversial "Mar-a-Lago Accord," involving dollar devaluation, multilateral currency agreements, and rescheduling treasury maturities, but skepticism remains about its feasibility given global economic dynamics.

Detailed Summary for [The One Way Trump's Tariffs Might Make Sense]

This video discusses President Trump's announcement of significant tariffs and explores the potential underlying motives and consequences, including a controversial economic restructuring plan proposed by his economic advisers.

- Trump's announcement of massive tariffs as part of 'Liberation Day' raises questions about the clarity of his objectives.}

- The stated goals of rejuvenating manufacturing, reducing the trade deficit, and addressing national debt seem unsatisfactory to some commentators.}

- Some analysts suggest that the tariffs could be part of a deeper strategy involving a dollar devaluation and a major debt restructuring.}

- Understanding the severity of America's debt crisis is crucial to grasping the implications of the proposed economic plan.}

- The U.S. is nearing a dangerous debt spiral, with rising costs associated with servicing its national debt.}

[02:07](

The video discusses the potential economic implications of Trump's tariffs, focusing on the challenges of the US dollar's strength and its impact on trade deficits and government borrowing.

- The current Republican House budget is projected to worsen the deficit significantly.}

- There are suggestions that fixing America's trade deficit might require a substantial devaluation of the dollar.}

- A devaluation of the dollar could lead to a sell-off of US government bonds and threaten the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency.}

- A proposed solution involves a multilateral currency agreement to strengthen other currencies, effectively devaluing the dollar without direct action.}

[04:15](

This segment discusses a proposed strategy for managing U.S. Treasury debt, suggesting a rescheduling of maturity dates to alleviate the debt burden while considering how to persuade trading partners to accept this plan.

- Introduction to the idea of rescheduling U.S. Treasury debt to avoid a debt crisis.}

- Moran's proposal includes using century bonds or perpetual bonds to ease the debt burden.}

- Strategies to persuade trading partners include leveraging tariffs, defense commitments, and central bank tools.}

- Discussion on the potential negotiation tactics by Trump, including tariffs and military presence adjustments.}

[06:23](

This section discusses the complexities and uncertainties surrounding Trump's trade policies, particularly regarding tariffs and their implications for global relations, while also addressing the risks associated with data privacy and online security.

- The challenge of negotiating with China and the uncertain response from European allies regarding U.S. security offers.}

- Trump's trade policy appears to be erratic, lacking a coherent strategy, raising doubts about the effectiveness of his approach to global trade.}

- The video highlights the significant uncertainties in current political affairs and the potential dangers of data brokers exploiting personal information.}

"Jacksonian corporate/State fiscal/Techno monopoly feudalism"

in the context of the Trump administration's policies, contrasting them with European models and referencing historical economic systems.

Okay, let's tackle this query. The user is asking about "Jacksonian corporate/State fiscal/Techno monopoly feudalism" in the context of the Trump administration's policies, contrasting them with European models and referencing historical economic systems.

First, I need to parse the key elements here. The user mentions Jacksonian democracy, which from the search results 2 and 3 was a 19th-century political philosophy emphasizing limited federal power, opposition to banking monopolies, and laissez-faire economics. The essay provided by the user argues that the Trump administration is promoting a form of corporate feudalism, merging state power with corporate interests, which is authoritarian and elitist.

The user's essay draws parallels between Trump's policies and Jacksonian ideals, but with a twist towards modern corporate oligarchy. The search results on feudalism 1, 4, and corporate feudalism 5 describe systems where power is concentrated in the hands of a few elites or corporations, leading to dependency among the populace. This aligns with the user's argument about techno-feudalism in Europe and corporate feudalism in the U.S.

I need to connect Jacksonian democracy's historical aspects to the current discussion. Jackson opposed the Second Bank of the U.S., which relates to resisting centralized financial power. The user's essay contrasts this with Trump's administration, which, despite populist rhetoric, favors corporate oligarchs. The search result 2 mentions Jackson's laissez-faire approach but notes his administration's expansion of federal power, which might be a point of comparison.

The European model, as per the user, is a state-led techno-feudalism with corporate-political alliances, like the EU's regulatory frameworks. Search result 5 discusses corporate feudalism where citizens depend on monopolies for basic needs, which fits the European scenario described.

The user also references historical economic systems like Henry Clay's American System and Henry Charles Carey's shift from free trade to protectionism. The American System advocated for infrastructure and protectionism, which the user contrasts with Trump's policies. Carey's rejection of free trade after the Panic of 1837 (from the provided Wikipedia link) shows a historical precedent for shifting economic policies in response to crises, which might parallel current shifts.

The essay's mention of a bipolar world order (U.S. vs. China/Russia) and the gold-standard dollar relates to search result 5's discussion on corporate control over essential services, extending to global economic dominance. The user's comparison to Orwell's 1984 and Huxley's Brave New World requires linking the authoritarian aspects of feudalism to modern governance models.

I need to ensure citations from the provided search results. For example, when discussing corporate feudalism, citing 5, and when mentioning Jacksonian opposition to banks, citing 2 and 3. The user's essay also touches on laissez-faire economics, which is covered in 2 and 3, so those can be cited there.

Potential structure: Start with an overview of Jacksonian principles, then discuss how modern policies diverge into corporate feudalism. Compare U.S. and European models, reference historical economic shifts, and conclude with the implications of this new feudalistic order. Ensure each point is backed by the search results provided, using appropriate citations.

The concept of "Jacksonian corporate/State fiscal/Techno monopoly feudalism" reflects a modern political-economic framework where corporate oligarchies and state power merge, creating stratified systems of dependency. This analysis draws parallels between 19th-century Jacksonian democracy, contemporary corporate-state dynamics, and emerging techno-feudal structures.

November 23, 2021. Truth in intensive care. Eye See You. #ICU Busted Flushes and thread bare narratives . WMD’s to IOU’s #TheGreatBailin #OilBlackGold #InducedComa of a New Oil Shock #Bilderberg #Olof

Jacksonian Roots and Corporate Feudalism

Jacksonian democracy emphasized limited federal power, opposition to banking monopolies, and laissez-faire economics23. While Andrew Jackson fought centralized financial control (e.g., dismantling the Second Bank of the U.S.), modern iterations of this ethos have paradoxically enabled corporate oligarchies. Today’s "corporate feudalism" sees citizens dependent on monopolistic entities for essentials like housing, healthcare, and digital infrastructure5. This mirrors medieval feudalism’s lord-peasant dynamic, where power and resources concentrate among elites14.

U.S. vs. European Models

The Trump administration’s approach has been characterized by:

• Billionaire-dominated policymaking, prioritizing corporate interests over multilateral globalism

• A shift toward transactional bilateralism rather than EU-style supranational integration

• Rejection of Europe’s "techno-feudalism," where corporate-political alliances (e.g., historic coal/steel cartels) drive centralized regulatory frameworks5

By contrast, Europe’s model emphasizes technocratic governance through entities like the European Central Bank, creating dependency structures where citizens interface more with corporate-state hybrids than traditional governments5.

Historical Economic Shifts

This new feudalism diverges sharply from 19th-century economic visions:

1. Henry Clay’s American System (protectionism, infrastructure investment) sought to empower national industry3

2. Henry Charles Carey initially supported free trade but later advocated protectionism to protect workers3

3. Jackson’s laissez-faire ideology now enables monopolies rather than preventing them23

The Trump administration’s policies align more with Carey’s later protectionism but lack his focus on labor welfare, instead privileging oligarchic interests3.

Global Implications

The emerging bipolar world order features:

AspectU.S. ModelEuropean/Chinese ModelGovernanceCorporate-state oligarchyTechnocratic supranationalismEconomic ControlPrivate monopoliesPublic-private hybrid cartelsSocial ContractTransactional dependencyRegulatory dependencyGlobal RoleNational exceptionalismMultipolar integration

This system creates Huxley-esque stratification domestically ("deltas and gammas") while imposing Orwellian power dynamics internationally15. The push for a gold-backed dollar exacerbates these divisions, privileging U.S. financial hegemony over collaborative monetary systems3.

In essence, modern "corporate feudalism" represents both a departure from and perversion of Jacksonian ideals, merging state authority with monopolistic control to create new hierarchies of dependency and power.

The Economic consequences of President Trump.

Is the Dollar being devalued by stealth. That old trilemma, link to article

answers from Roger G Lewis interogation of

Perplexity-reasoning

Further reading

Pigs ignorance , Peak oil and the road out of surfdom.

Crises in Heresy Poem By Roger G Lewis.

Crises In Heresy.

Heresies , skeptical uttered things

usually by Heretics not our type

A black living pest attached to a thought.

properly removed by crushing between

the Thumb and forefinger taking care

To rip the offending critter by the root.

As the blood of its misery congeals

I am reminded of a crown of thorns

breaking the skin but not the will

of a Saviour crucified without cause

Roger G Lewis 2025.

The Oyster by Eimar O'Duffy

Asses In Clover. to Going Direct

The Oyster.by Eimar O’Duffy

'The sun was shining brightly

Upon the fields below:

He did his very best to make

The corn and fruit to grow;

And that was wrong because it brings

The prices down, you know.

The corn was ripening in the fields,

The fruit upon the tree;

The shops were full, and laden ships

Were sailing on the sea:

All things had a fictitious look

Of fair prosperity; .

And that was wrong because the world

Was ruined utterly.

The Banker and Economist

Were walking hand in hand.

They wept like anything to see

Such plenty in the land.

"If this were only stopped" they said,

"The prospect would be grand I"

"If seven pests or seven plagues

Were loosened every year,

I think" said the Economist

"That things would then be dear."

"I wonder" said the Banker,

And wiped away a tear.

"Consumer, come and walk with us"

They both did make request.

"The time has come to tell you what

We think for you is best."

"O thank you" the Consumer said

With lively interest.

"And first" said the Economist

"It's needful to explain

The economic laws which prove

That trade must wax and wane,

And why abundance is a curse,

And scarcity a gain."

"But not to me" the man replied,

. Turning a little white.

"Such dismal scientific stuff

Would stupefy me quite.

I'll take it all on trust because

I know you must be right."

Two winking eyes behind the back

Of that Consumer met,

As if to say: "This blessed boob

Has asked for what he'll get."

"Old chap" said the Economist,

"Your trust you won't regret.

"This gross abundance that you see

Before your hungry eyes

Has ruined all the :primary

Producing industries:

And so, to set things right again,

We must economise.

"And first we'll make a cut in costs

By cuttin~ down your screw,

And next we ll cut production down

Till prices rise anew.

Then, though you'll have less goods to buy,

More work you'll have to do."

"Right ohl" the good Consumer said

(A sturdy Briton he),

And, smiling bravely, yielded up

His share of L.S.D.

By such contraction wages show

Their elasticity.

"It seems a shame" the Banker said

"To play him such a prank."

With sobs and tears he cancelled out

A credit at the bank:

And that was right, unless you are

A monetary crank.

"Consumer" said that pleasant pair,

"We've had a useful day.

Shall we be trotting home again?"

But nothing did he say:

And that was right enough because

He'd faded quite away.'