"Jacksonian corporate / State fiscal/Techno monopoly feudalism"

Elitist , Authoritarian and A Brave New World Order for the US and 1984 for the rest

The Golden Calf is Europe the EU and UK with Ukraine and the minerals deal a Tasty Hors d’Oeuvres

### Jacksonian Corporate/State Fiscal/Techno Monopoly Feudalism: The New Authoritarian Reality of the Trump Doctrine

The advent of the Trump administration has ushered in a new era of American political and economic reality, one that is authoritarian in nature and deeply rooted in the promotion of a corporate oligarchy. This oligarchy, led by a cabinet of billionaires and elites, has turned its back on the globalist agenda that defined much of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Instead, it champions a version of American exceptionalism that prioritizes U.S. dominance over the European-centric global order, relegating its allies and competitors alike to Orwellian subservience in a transactional, bipolar world order. This essay explores the implications of this shift, drawing on historical economic doctrines, the rise of techno-feudalism, and the evolving geopolitical landscape.

#### The Decline of Globalism and the Rise of U.S. Oligarchy

The Trump administration represents a stark departure from the neoliberal and neoconservative principles that dominated U.S. foreign and economic policy during the post-Cold War era. These principles, encapsulated in documents like *The Project for the New American Century* (PNAC), sought to establish a unipolar world order underpinned by U.S.-led globalization. This framework was heavily reliant on information monopolies and the integration of global markets, which served the interests of multinational corporations and technocratic elites.

However, the Trump doctrine rejects this globalist vision in favor of a new form of Jacksonian populism that paradoxically empowers an oligarchic elite. While ostensibly promoting the interests of the American working class, this administration has concentrated power in the hands of billionaires and corporate leaders, creating a system that resembles a modern form of feudalism. In this system, the U.S. oligarchy operates as a ruling class, while the broader population is relegated to the status of "deltas" and "gammas," as described in Aldous Huxley's *Brave New World*. Meanwhile, America's allies, particularly in Europe, are reduced to Orwellian "Airstrip One" vassals, serving the interests of U.S. hegemony rather than their own sovereignty.

#### European Techno-Feudalism: A Competing Vision

In contrast to the Trump administration's oligarchic nationalism, Europe has embraced a form of state monopoly techno-feudalism. This system, characterized by the dominance of corporate-political alliances and technocratic governance, is epitomized by the European Union's regulatory frameworks and its historical ties to industrial cartels like the European Coal and Steel Community. These structures prioritize centralized control and the integration of markets across national borders, creating a supranational order that often undermines individual state sovereignty.

The European model, while ostensibly more egalitarian, is no less elitist than its American counterpart. It relies on the dominance of multinational corporations and technocratic elites who wield significant influence over policy-making. This system has created a new form of feudalism, where the masses are subject to the whims of a corporate-political aristocracy. In this context, the Trump administration's rejection of globalism can be seen as a challenge to Europe's techno-feudal order, favoring a return to national sovereignty and bilateral transactions over multilateralism.

#### The Bipolar World Order: U.S. vs. East Asia

The Trump doctrine's emphasis on American exceptionalism has also reshaped the global geopolitical landscape, creating a new bipolar order. In this framework, the United States and its allies face off against a bloc led by China and Russia, reminiscent of George Orwell's *1984*. While the U.S. oligarchy consolidates its power domestically and among its vassals, China and Russia represent an alternative vision of authoritarian governance and state-controlled capitalism. This dynamic has relegated much of the world to a state of perpetual subservience, caught between competing authoritarian powers.

In this new order, the United States seeks to maintain its dominance through the promotion of a gold-standard-based dollar as the world's reserve currency. This move, while ostensibly aimed at stabilizing the global economy, serves to reinforce U.S. economic hegemony while undermining the multipolar aspirations of its competitors. The result is a transactional reality in which economic and political alliances are dictated by short-term interests rather than shared values or long-term objectives.

#### Historical Context: The Rejection of the American System

The Trump administration's approach stands in stark contrast to the economic principles of the American System, as advocated by figures like Henry Clay and Henry Charles Carey. This system, rooted in protectionism, infrastructure development, and the promotion of domestic industry, sought to create a self-sufficient and prosperous nation. Carey's later rejection of free trade and his emphasis on the "happiness of nations" highlight a vision of political economy that prioritized the well-being of the laboring population over the interests of elites.

In abandoning these principles, the Trump administration has embraced a form of laissez-faire capitalism that serves the interests of the oligarchy at the expense of the broader population. While this approach may bolster U.S. dominance in the short term, it risks exacerbating inequality and undermining the long-term stability of the American economy.

#### Conclusion: A Brave New World for Some, 1984 for Others

The Trump administration's authoritarian and elitist policies have created a new reality for the United States and the world. Domestically, the U.S. oligarchy thrives in a system that resembles Huxley's *Brave New World*, with a stratified society that privileges the elite while relegating the masses to subservience. Internationally, America's allies and competitors are forced into an Orwellian existence, navigating a bipolar world order dominated by competing authoritarian powers.

This new reality represents a departure from the globalist aspirations of the past and the nationalist economic principles of the American System. Instead, it reflects a transactional and elitist vision of governance that prioritizes the interests of the few over the well-being of the many. As the world adjusts to this new order, the challenge will be to find a balance between sovereignty and cooperation, nationalism and globalism, and freedom and control. Whether such a balance can be achieved remains to be seen, but the stakes could not be higher.

This is the Input I placed into Chat GPT to generate the above essay.

Write an essay with the title "Jacksonian corporate / State fiscal/Techno monopoly fuedalism".The premise of the Essay is that the New Trump administration is Authoritarian and elitist in nature propmoting the US oligarchy and his cabinet of Billionaires over the State Monopoly techno fuedalism favoured by the European Elitist corporate Political state and the European coal and Steel Cartel. The Trump doctorine promotes American Exceptionalism and is founded on the Information monopolies that have grown up in The Project for the New Ameriacan century Peanac document what was NeoCOn and Neo Liberal and essentialy Globalist in nature. The Trump based US billionair corporate oligarchy has turned on the Globalist agenda promoting a US Order relegating the European vassals to the status or Orwellian Airstrip one status in the Case of the Uk and to The other East Asia appelations found in 1984 ( Orwell) . SO its Brave New World for the US oligarchy and its delta and gamma fuedal population but 1984 for for everyone else witrh Puting and China playing the rule of East Asia. This is the new Transactional polöitical reality privelidging a new Gold Standard based Dollar as a reserve currency in a Bi Polar not Multipola world oreder this is not a new American system renaisance as advocated by the La rouche Group under the economics of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_System_(economic_plan) Henry Clay and further away still from the Henry Charles Carey Economist

In 1835, Carey read the published 1829–30 lectures of Nassau William Senior titled The Rate of Wages and The Cost of Obtaining Money and published his refutation Essay on the Rate of Wages, with an Examination of the Differences in the Condition of the Laboring Population throughout the World.[5][6] Carey agreed with Senior's principles and main propositions but criticized the Senior's failure to adjust for real wage rates.[7] He remained an advocate of free trade in the essay, writing that "Laissez nous faire is the true doctrine. . . it is now so fully understood that the true policy of the United States is freedom of trade and action, that there will be every day less disposition to interfere with it." Nevertheless, his intensely nationalist tone conflicted with economic orthodoxy; Carey identified the purpose of political economy as the promotion of the happiness of nations and the application of national labor for the comfort of workers.[7]

The same year that Essay on the Rate of Wages was published, Carey retired from active business with a fortune and devoted his time to economics and related work.[7] He began work on a text, The Harmony of Nature, which he did not feel adequate for wider publication but which became central to his later thinking.[5] Setting this work aside, he began Principles of Political Economy in 1837, an expansion of his refutation of Senior.[8] He completed the three-volume work in 1840. This work was largely adapted by the French economist Frédéric Bastiat in his own Harmonie Economiques in 1849, with some later accusing Bastiat of plagiarism.[9][6][5] The first volume explained Carey's labor theory of value. Its second volume, a comparative study of credit systems in France, Great Britain, and the United States, reads as a defense of the American free banking system, particularly as practiced in New England, in the wake of the Panic of 1837.[10] It was cited favorably by John Stuart Mill in defense of his own arguments for a similar system in Britain.[10] Carey continued to ground his thinking in standard laissez faire doctrine, writing that "Governments have arrogated to themselves the task of regulating the currency, and the natural effect is that nothing is less regular." He would soon thereafter abandon the doctrine.[11]

Rejection of free trade

Following the Panic of 1837 and the success of the protectionist Tariff of 1842, Carey became an open critic of free trade.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Charles_Carey