Going Direct Isn't Working, Part 4, addendum. "Watergate doesn't bother me, does your conscience bother you?"
"Then Reason really doesn't mean that much to you".
Uploaded on: November 9, 2020
Uploaded by: rogerglewis
Junto Biden pronounced Hunter Biden Versus Flip Flop to The Golden Turd
Or, The doors to the technocratic prison will open with.
"near the window at which I sit" is not a well-known or famous quote attributed to Henry George. It seems like it might be a phrase from his writings or a personal reflection, but it's not a common quote people associate with him. Henry George is known for his work on land reform and his critique of poverty, particularly in his book "Progress and Poverty".
“Near the window by which I write a
great bull is tethered by a ring in his nose. Grazing round and
round he has wound his rope about the stake until now he stands
a close prisoner, tantalized by rich grass he cannot reach,
unable even to toss his head to rid him of the flies that cluster
on his shoulders. Now and again he struggles vainly, and then,
after pitiful bellowings, relapses into silent misery.
This bull, a very type of massive strength, who, because he
has not wit enough to see how he might be free, suffers want
in sight of plenty, and is helplessly preyed upon by weaker
creatures, seems to me no unfit emblem of the working masses”
2024 Election.Same old Same Old Vote Independant. The Uni Party isn't Working
#They The Hierarchy That Enslaves You.
“the gates of the technocratic prison will open automatically, despite their rusty ancient hinges, as soon as we choose to walk out.” Lewis Mumford. Post Technocracy = Technopoly.(The Real Thing)
rogerglewis April 28, 2022
The conquest of Circuses , By Roger G Lewis
“Come see the show, a spectacle to behold.Laugh, gasp, and wonder, at the stories told.Feats of strength, courage, and obedienceThe bread of suspended beliefs magnificence”.
Regarde les tableaux, catch it on Zooma trapeze sans net, a dramatic tuneUnprecedented they said since that Warenjoy the spectacle, don’t make a furore
enraptured,seduced the entertained group.A low price of entry makes you the dupeThose Roman circuses, coupled to Doleif you want bread? know the circuses’ role.
"Then Reason really doesn't mean that much to you".
I have a few hours this morning so here goes.
I am going to explain my self , and make a Blog Post to take this discussion a few clicks away to the roads less travelled in internet land.
Notes. Photo on Blog.
Monica
Analysis of the Dialogue in the Style of C.S. Peirce
Introduction
In examining the dialogue presented, we find ourselves immersed in a complex interplay of ideas regarding reason, perception, and societal structures. The participants engage in a discourse that reflects Peirce's principles of inquiry, emphasizing the importance of clarity, distinctness, and the pursuit of truth. This analysis aims to unpack the underlying themes of the dialogue, drawing upon Peirce's philosophical framework to illuminate the nuances of the conversation.
The Nature of Reason
The assertion that "Reason really doesn't mean that much to you" serves as a pivotal point in the dialogue. It encapsulates a fundamental tension between subjective interpretations of reason and the objective reality that Peirce advocates for in his epistemology. Peirce posits that genuine inquiry requires a commitment to intellectual honesty and a sincere love of truth. The dialogue's participants grapple with their understanding of reason as they navigate differing perspectives on significant societal issues.
Reason as a Tool for Understanding
In Peirce's view, reason is not merely a tool for validation but a dynamic process of inquiry that seeks to uncover the underlying patterns of cause and effect. The dialogue illustrates this process as participants reflect on their beliefs and the implications of those beliefs within the broader context of societal manipulation and power dynamics. The emphasis on questioning assumptions aligns with Peirce's notion that true understanding arises from a willingness to challenge established norms and perceptions.
The Role of Perception
The dialogue's exploration of perception highlights the complexities that arise when individuals confront their own biases and limitations. The mention of "mental and emotional limitations" in understanding significant events like 9/11 resonates with Peirce's assertion that perception is inherently tied to our experiences and the frameworks we employ to interpret them.
Expanding Understanding
Participants discuss the importance of expanding one's understanding, reflecting Peirce's idea that inquiry should not be confined to preconceived notions. The dialogue underscores the necessity of engaging with diverse perspectives to cultivate a more holistic view of reality. This aligns with Peirce's pragmatic maxim, which suggests that the meaning of concepts is found in their practical consequences and applications.
The Interplay of Evidence and Assumptions
A recurring theme in the dialogue is the distinction between truth found in evidence and assumptions that can lead individuals astray. This dichotomy mirrors Peirce's emphasis on the scientific method as a reliable means of inquiry. The participants' discussions surrounding the 9/11 events and the implications of various theories reflect a broader struggle to reconcile empirical evidence with deeply held beliefs.
The Challenge of Skepticism
Peirce advocates for a form of skepticism grounded in a rigorous examination of evidence. The dialogue reveals how skepticism can be both a tool for enlightenment and a source of contention. As participants challenge one another's views, they embody Peirce's notion that the pursuit of truth often involves navigating complex social dynamics and confronting uncomfortable realities.
The Societal Context
The dialogue situates itself within a broader societal context, addressing themes of manipulation, power, and the implications of economic structures. The references to historical events and contemporary issues illustrate the interconnectedness of individual beliefs and collective experiences.
The Influence of Money and Power
Peirce's insights into the nature of money as a social construct resonate throughout the dialogue. Participants discuss the implications of financial systems on societal structures, echoing Peirce's assertion that our understanding of money and value is deeply intertwined with ethical considerations and human relationships. This exploration invites a reevaluation of how monetary practices shape social dynamics and contribute to systemic inequalities.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the dialogue serves as a rich tapestry of ideas that reflect the complexities of human reasoning, perception, and societal structures. By employing Peirce's philosophical framework, we gain a deeper understanding of the interplay between reason, evidence, and the broader context of human experience. The participants' engagement in this discourse exemplifies the ongoing quest for truth and the necessity of intellectual humility in navigating the labyrinth of ideas that shape our understanding of the world. As we reflect on this dialogue, we are reminded of Peirce's call to embrace inquiry as a lifelong pursuit, one that challenges us to remain open to new perspectives and the evolving nature of truth.
Share
repeat without nmade uop insights attributed to pierce stick to the sources in the reference text,
Analysis of the Dialogue
Introduction
The dialogue presented explores a range of complex themes surrounding reason, perception, and societal structures. Participants engage in a discourse that reflects their differing views on significant issues, particularly in relation to events like 9/11 and broader societal manipulation. This analysis seeks to unpack the key themes of the conversation while remaining grounded in the sources referenced in the text.
The Nature of Reason
The assertion that "Reason really doesn't mean that much to you" serves as a critical point in the dialogue. This statement encapsulates the tension between subjective interpretations of reason and the objective reality that participants are grappling with. The dialogue emphasizes the importance of questioning assumptions and understanding the implications of those beliefs within the context of societal manipulation and power dynamics.
Reason as a Tool for Understanding
Participants reflect on their understanding of reason as they navigate differing perspectives on significant societal events. The emphasis on questioning assumptions aligns with the idea that true understanding arises from a willingness to challenge established norms and perceptions. This process is essential for uncovering deeper truths about the world and the mechanisms of power that influence individual beliefs.
The Role of Perception
The exploration of perception highlights the complexities that arise when individuals confront their biases and limitations. The mention of "mental and emotional limitations" in understanding significant events like 9/11 suggests that perception is inherently tied to personal experiences and the frameworks individuals employ to interpret them.
Expanding Understanding
The dialogue underscores the necessity of engaging with diverse perspectives to cultivate a more holistic view of reality. Participants discuss the importance of expanding their understanding, which reflects the idea that inquiry should not be confined to preconceived notions. By challenging their assumptions, they can better grasp the complexities of the issues at hand.
The Interplay of Evidence and Assumptions
A recurring theme in the dialogue is the distinction between truth found in evidence and assumptions that can lead individuals astray. This dichotomy illustrates the struggle to reconcile empirical evidence with deeply held beliefs. Participants discuss the implications of various theories surrounding the 9/11 events, reflecting the broader challenge of navigating conflicting narratives.
The Challenge of Skepticism
Skepticism emerges as both a tool for enlightenment and a source of contention in the dialogue. As participants challenge one another's views, they embody the notion that the pursuit of truth often involves navigating complex social dynamics and confronting uncomfortable realities. The discussions reveal how skepticism can drive deeper inquiry while also complicating consensus.
The Societal Context
The dialogue situates itself within a broader societal context, addressing themes of manipulation, power, and the implications of economic structures. Participants reference historical events and contemporary issues, illustrating the interconnectedness of individual beliefs and collective experiences.
The Influence of Money and Power
The conversation touches on the nature of money as a social construct and its implications for societal structures. Participants discuss how financial systems shape social dynamics and contribute to systemic inequalities. This exploration highlights the need to reevaluate how monetary practices influence power relations and societal outcomes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the dialogue serves as a rich exploration of ideas that reflect the complexities of human reasoning, perception, and societal structures. Participants engage in a discourse that challenges them to confront their beliefs and consider the broader implications of their understanding. By reflecting on these themes, we are reminded of the importance of intellectual humility and the ongoing quest for truth in navigating the complexities of the world around us.
That is the neutral takeaway by the Bogus AI, which makes a lot of shit up.
Scads
Introduction, What Why and How, a note On SCADS and Conspiracies.
In Setting Out these pages I am acutely aware that with each link, each map and each Film, readers are on the edge of a Labyrinth of rabbit holes and may be nervous of the charge, if found furtively, browsing these pages of, "Conspiracy Theorist". Take heart, no conspiracies are required. What is, however, apparent is manipulation, especially of the psychological variety. Fear of the label Conspiracy Theorist is but one such of these psychological manipulations. ( See SCADS for further re-assurance.)
So for negotiating this Labyrinth, I offer this rather long, although informative, Ball of String ( As Ariadne gave to Theseus), a Dialogue that was published in the early seventies of a disputation between Skousen and Quigley,Authors both of Two Books dealing with the same material as dealt with here on this site and by extention the Novel , "The Conquest of Dough"
So take good head of the Old Poem, The Elephant of Hindustan and Read this dialogue , carrollquigley Round Table Review
Judy Wood
Dr. Judy Wood's presentation explores unconventional theories on 9/11 events, emphasizing directed energy technology, anomalies in destruction patterns, and unexplainable phenomena observed at Ground Zero.
Detailed Summary for [Dr Judy Wood 9 11 Presentation, Breakthrough Energy Movement Directed Energy Technology]
Dr. Judy Wood discusses the mental and emotional limitations that affect our perception of reality, emphasizing the importance of questioning assumptions and seeking evidence to understand the truth about significant events like 9/11.
- Introduction of mental limitations that shape our perceptions.}
- The idea that our perception creates our reality and the need to expand our understanding.}
- The significance of evidence in scientific inquiry and questioning the disappearance of the towers.}
- The distinction between truth found in evidence and assumptions that can lead us astray.}
The video presents a detailed examination of the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, focusing on the lack of visible rubble and the implications of the destruction of the World Trade Center.
- Introduction to the location at Liberty Plaza and anticipation to explore the site.}
- Discussion on the surprising absence of rubble where the towers once stood, raising questions about the destruction.}
- Explanation from a volunteer about how much of the debris fell into the ground and was pulverized, providing insight into the nature of the destruction.}
The aftermath of the 9/11 disaster reveals the immense challenges faced by rescue teams and the desperate situation of survivors trapped beneath the debris.
- Significant cleanup efforts are underway, with large amounts of debris already removed from the site.}
- Survivors trapped in the North Tower's stairwell experience a life-threatening situation, realizing their helplessness.}
- Amidst the chaos, a critical communication breakthrough occurs when a Mayday call from Captain Jay Jonas finally reaches rescue operations.}
In this segment, Dr. Judy Wood discusses the seismic signals recorded during the collapse of Building 7 on 9/11, emphasizing the unique phenomena observed and the terminology used to describe them.
- Dr. Wood introduces the seismic signals recorded during the collapse of Building 7, noting their unusual characteristics.}
- She explains the importance of using precise language when discussing unknown phenomena, advocating for new terminology to accurately describe the events.}
- The concept of 'justification' is introduced, referring to the way buildings turned to dust during their collapse, which is a phenomenon not previously observed.}
- Dr. Wood elaborates on the collapse process, suggesting that as the building disintegrated, the water tanks within weakened, contributing to the overall failure.}
The video discusses the unusual characteristics of dust and debris following the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11, highlighting evidence that suggests a controlled demolition rather than a traditional collapse.
- The dust from the collapse did not disperse as expected, indicating a possible controlled demolition.}
- The dust continued to rise and linger in the air for an extended period, raising questions about its behavior post-collapse.}
- The condition of vehicles near the site, described as 'toasted', suggests an anomalous heat source or energy event.}
- Observations of undamaged car components challenge the idea of conventional fire damage, indicating something atypical occurred.}
The video discusses the peculiarities surrounding the temperatures and conditions observed at the 9/11 site, focusing on the contradictions between reported heat levels and the physical evidence found.
- Introduction to temperature measurements indicating extreme heat, questioning the physical state of materials.}
- Observation that certain materials, like trees and paper, did not burn despite high temperatures, raising questions about the nature of the heat source.}
- Discussion on the melting of steel-toed boots while rescue workers reported no burns, suggesting an anomaly in the heat experienced.}
- Speculation on the disintegration of boots rather than melting due to heat, implying other factors were at play.}
This section discusses the unexpected hurricane during the events of 9/11, highlighting the lack of public awareness and evacuation measures despite the storm's potential threat to Manhattan.
- Introduction to the hurricane's relevance to the 9/11 events.}
- Discussion on the risk of flooding in Manhattan if the hurricane had not changed course.}
- Emphasis on the underreporting of the hurricane by media and authorities.}
- Observation of the hurricane's unusual path and timing relative to 9/11.}
- Questioning why there were no evacuation orders despite the hurricane's presence.}
In this segment, Dr. Judy Wood discusses the unusual physical phenomena observed in the aftermath of the 9/11 events, particularly focusing on the behavior of materials and the implications of directed energy technology.
- Dr. Wood explains a concept of energy transfer using an analogy of dropping a rock in a pond, suggesting that similar energy ripples could cause structural damage.}
- The discussion shifts to hurricanes and tornadoes, mentioning unusual occurrences such as debris being driven through solid materials, implying a deeper understanding of energy interactions.}
- Dr. Wood references experiments by John Hutchison, showcasing how aluminum can be manipulated under specific conditions, raising questions about the physical properties of materials involved in the 9/11 incident.}
- The segment touches on the peculiarities of melted metals found at Ground Zero, questioning the melting points of materials and their unexpected bonding, suggesting a different kind of energy influence.}
- Dr. Wood describes samples with cylindrical holes and embedded materials, hinting at advanced technological processes that may explain the observed anomalies at the World Trade Center.}
Gallalie .- population
INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF DEPOPULATION GLOBALIZATION EXPLAINED BY K. GALALAE
INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF DEPOPULATION GLOBALIZATION EXPLAINED BY K. GALALAE
I have generated Subtitles and a summary of Kevin’s original 2017 presentation which given the nature of the material has never survived long on YouTube.
I first encountered Kevin’s video back in 2016 when it was posted on YouTube. It will seem familiar ground after the past 4 years , prescient I guess you would have to call it it has aged very well.
This was my upload to Bitchute in 2018 after the mirrored upload was taken off youtube,
bitchute Video Link gives due to youtube censorship
regarding the Depopulation Hypothesis, Theory, Evidence, and Analysis.
Kevin Galalae’s Mandala diagram analysis is I think the most extensive out there still
INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM OF DEPOPULATION GLOBALIZATION EXPLAINED BY K. GALALAE
Why are we here
January 8, 2017
Why are we here, An essay provoked by Golem XIv´s David Malones latest Documentary Series.
Why are we here, An essay provoked by Golem XIv´s David Malones latest Documentary Series.
The four films are:
1) Meaning Seeking Beings
2) The Reality of Ideas
3) The Animal Within
4) The Moral Compass
Here is the link to the first part.
Hi David I Look forward to finding a torrent in due course, looks fascinating.I really enjoyed the previews, stunning images, we expect nothing less from your lens. Rather silly that the Beeb or Channel 4 will not be showing it especially in these days of I Player on demand, it begs the question why did they air Hyper-Normalization, what is Curtis´s secret sauce?
I do not know why I am here at this moment in time, let alone who ,´´We´´are? or what ´WE´is? Who, where, when and why???. What everyone else is doing let alone why they are doing it ( personally I would not know where to start finding out).
Universals escape my possibility of imagination, let alone perception or understanding.
I do know that I find ideas endlessly fascinating and peoples opinions on ideas are also fascinating. Even scientific ´truths´ are open to interpretation the Ceteris Paribus and mutatis mutandis adjustment mechanisms always leave room for dogma or spin of one sort or another. Science is often said to be a-political detached a-moral even, I am not convinced that it ever is, any less than religion is both make truth claims to fundamental universal truths, both are absurd without faith/belief and rely ultimately on appeals to authority, peer review, peer pressure, coercion to the greater power. The greater power being the arbiter over premature life and death or prosperity or ruin ultimately, usually a soldier or magistrate, justice of the peace, priest or Academician or motley committee of or squad of the same, will back up the authority by the required degree of censure by the usual mechanisms of exclusion or elimination.
The scientific method is a means of enquiry which is more useful than the general class of knowledge claims we call Science, or scientific truths. Materialism is I think more to do with the conclusions and received `truths´ than the Process of enquiry or, “Scientific Method, which has proven to be an excellent method for making discoveries within bounded limits.
Does Science or more precisely the Scientific Method, do a better job than Art in communicating the essence of the unknown and perhaps unknowable or, at least the immeasurable? This question does, of course, open up preferences for figurative or abstract and a posteri or, a priori reasoning. All of which have their own sets of believers or followers, factions or fanatics.
I am also offended by the notion that one needs to be one or the other and that Materialism and Idealism are of necessity or custom mutually exclusive. I do not believe they are and there are more ways of being and acting than as through Matter or Thought in three dimensions of time and space.
Both positions alone, seem to lack an imagination for further dimensions beyond time bounded 3-dimensional commonplaces. The competition between the two is an intellectual dick waving competition, far be it from anyone to spoil the fun of those who wish to participate. Girls can play too but what they wave I will leave to each your own imagination.
Ordinary everyday matters of life’s necessaries are more important to my own lights, though.
It is these essential necessary areas where community leadership should stem from, stock taking is an empirical process which goes back to the foundation of mathematical and metrological tools applied to the question and problem of what do we have and how do we share it out?. Priests and medicine men have always justified divine rights of power structure elites to determine these questions and sadly what we are told we are here for by both sides of the binary Materialism Idealism debate lead to an implied notion that it´s all too hard for those who have cares regarding the necessities of life to begin to understand. The subtext to the metrological questions of, who gets what? Is, you get what you are given and be grateful for the beneficence of the powers that be. They know best because; God, Markets, Science or Maths, or, Elitist job creation .. etc, etc,etc.. the eternal appeal to external authority.
The most profound thing I think I have ever read is a short question posed in Neal Donald Walsh’s, Conversations with God. ´´What would love do now?´´.
Population Paper
December 23, 2019
Over Population Paper. How Big a Waste paper Basket ( Ayers), Quite so.
Over Population Paper.
Over Population is a general Term, the question can be broken down into two components;One, Over Population what is it? And, two, Overpopulation, do we have that problem ?
In these questions Kippling’s Six honest serving men will help us with both parts of the question.
What and Why and When And How and Where and Who
Overpopulation.
What is Overpopulation.
Over population is a qualitative concept meaning more population than a certain amount, The Boundary at which Population is over or under is unclear.
Why is It overpopulated.
When an arbitrary or defined limit is set one would ask why the OverLoad/Capacity State has occurred, How long it might have been that way where the state has occurred if it is perhaps not present everywhere but localised and who are the members of the population that has met any particular definition of Overpopulation.
Do we have an Overpopulation Problem.
Where do we see Overpopulation as a state according to our defined boundary condition, to establish if we have reached a certain state we need a measure as we are talking about Human Population then we would look at the number of people that there are, fortunately the United nations has a large data base of demographic statistical data regarding world populations.
When we talk about overpopulation are we talking about Population in relation to Physical space, ( over crowding) What the idea of Overpopulation is , is that there are too many Human Beings for the available resources of life’s necessaries. Water, Food, and shelter etc.
This new measure , the measure of available resources introduces more complexity to our inquiry into what Overpopulation might be scientifically to help to define the questions regarding our system it would help to build a model of the system we wish to analyses
Population necessary resources ( Pr ) Resources (Ar) where Pr^Ar= overpopulation at its simplest that simple equation is a model of what overpopulation would look like. If Resources available for life’s necessaries are less than the Available resources that would be overpopulation, We would have to add in a time factor say if the situation endured for a certain period of time (Tx) so Pr ^ Ar . Tx^n where n ^y with this equation there is the added complication that this is not a fixed set of parameters, Population may go up or down, Resources available for life’s necessaries may also go up or down,
With such a large and complex question one gets into scenarios and theoretical outcomes, What if’s?. There are many opinions of these what if scenarios and no shortage of people that will offer their opinion as to why their particular What if Scenario is more likely than yours or mine to occur, Because (—-Your opinion here….). One Such what if scenario is this 2000 paper by Steven B Kurz.(1)
Authentic Discourses blog reasons to act
May 4, 2017
Authentic Discourses on Decisions to Act. @CultStateDotCom
Authentic Discourses on Decisions to Act.
A golden Rule in folklores Canon
holds what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the Gander
do unto others that which to you would be done
thus applied in discussion, we should always avoid slander.
Leave at the first introduction
the habits of Authority and induction
When those listening seem deaf to what you tell
refrain if you please from poisoning the well
if your working hypothesis requires certitude
refrain from tailoring cloth that renders the emperor nude
If to your point, you wish others to allude
refrain from a hypocritical sneering attitude.
When your correspondent appeals to evidence
consider their sources, were they well meant?
In all matters, skepticism will serve you with equivalence
and always remember to mistrust the Government.
“man müsse das Volk stets in Armuth erhalten, damit es gehorsam bleibe.”(2)
Belloc characterised the reformation as
´´a rising of the rich against the poor´´,(1)
´and indeed Calvin had written the unfortunate statement:
´´The people must always be kept in poverty in order that they remain obedient´´.(2)
p.198 Lost Science of Money.(1)
archive.org link to Calvins quote (2)
Are We at Crossed Purposes, A default setting, if we are honest with ourselves is to anticipate most of what we are going to hear? So as much as we like to think we listen, being at crossed purposes is likely far more common than we realise. Every conversation has its own unwritten small print this small print is the lens with which all anticipation and interpretation of external information gets filtered back into our deeper thoughts and are assigned their proper place in our own conceptual order of meaning to OurSelves, singularly not in any Royal We sense but sui generis to our own design between our individual self and the great cosmological static.
When we gain knowledge of the world are we experiencing it or are we thinking it? It is really a combination and a cycle between, Sleep and dreaming and Awakeness and automatic experiences External Sensing and imaginings within our thinking portal.
The eyes are the window to the soul looking in, but the soul is us looking out and acquiring physical experience of possibilities outside of our thoughtful imaginings.
our human Being is a portal that offers access to dimensions of Being and dimensions of thinking and combines the dimensions of Being and Thinking when we employ our powerful interdimensional apparatus to synthesise shareable goods or sometimes we synthesise a combination of Bads.
When we discover the truth everyone will not be a winner, one can think of many situations and states of affairs which should the truth be honoured, then some group or collection of powerful interests may lose some previously justified privilege. This essayical melange is not though, about the defense of the indefensible it is about making our wishes clear, stating our opinions clearly and honestly and seeking agreement. Agreement to disagree is a much preferable outcome to an enduring resentment against those with whom we differ, about some matter or state of affairs.
“Whenever you get two people interpreting the same data in different ways,” “that’s metaphysics.” is a quote from an interview published in Scientific American with Thomas Khun the coiner of the term and proposer of the concept of paradigm shifts.
scientificamerican.com what thomas kuhn really thought about scientific truth
We are not in the habit of stating the limits of which, what we believe and state as fact will remain to be true and stand up to scrutiny. We tend to state our claims as if they were absolutes much of the time.
The Good Life design plastic toys in Cornflakes packets.
The Basic theme of this video is that the sham of political Choice presented as democracy is puppeteering of cloned politicians who parrot the NeoLiberal Ideology of The Oligarchical Class so that Human Slave Farming can be continued with as little resistance or trouble from we Plebs in the precariat as possible.
I imagine the Politicians we are offered as the Plastic Prizes given by corporations with our cereal packets in the morning, Tom Goode in the Good Life designed them as his Job. (Plastic Animals not Politicians) wikipedia link The_Good life On his 40th birthday, Tom Good is no longer able to take his job seriously and gives up work as a draughtsman for a company that makes plastic toys for breakfast cereal packets. link to letthemconfectsweeterlies.blog
Plastic May, Farron, Blair etc
Organic Corbyn. ( See Karaoke Politics)
Mihop Lihop
Perpetrators
There is a huge amount of evidence that the US defences were stymied with complicity of a small number of senior figures in the US government, implicating the US Deep state in the attack. Their support for the attacks is found in the fact that the events were covered up rather than investigated. Researchers differ on whether the cabal let it happen on purpose (LIHOP) or whether they made it happen on purpose (MIHOP). Mark Gorton suggests that the 9/11 operation was planned by George H. W. Bush although he admits that he has no direct evidence linking him.[28] In recent years, increasing numbers of 9-11 researchers are supporting Chris Bollyn's theories, which look at Mossad involvement[29] and there does indeed seem to be a serious case to answer - summarised on the 9-11/Israel did it subpage.
search Lonhhaired musings for make+it+happen+on+purpose
search Lonhhaired musings for Let+it+happen+on+purpose
Socratic learning Blog
July 6, 2012
Socratic Management, learning by remembering.#PlaceMakingBasics #AuthenticPlaceMaking #CitizensNotSubjects #TheCure #RealRLD #WeDoDeals
#AuthenticPlaceMaking #CitizensNotSubjects #TheCure #RealRLD #WeDoDeals
In the 1990ś Sir John Harvey Jones ( The retired Chairman of I C I the Chemical Giant) presented a wonderful television series called Trouble shooter, I still have the book. I watched it eagerly as a young man and remember marvelling at the informal yet spellbinding wisdom that Sir John radiated in his trademark managing by walking around.
fast forward to today and a blog I did last week about Lucian and his Auction of philosophers in the slave Market in Samos and the Pythagorian pitch of what his philosophy offered.” I will not teach you I will remind you.´
Then we have Socrates and his philosophy and inquiry into the citizens of Athens daily perceptions of reality, government by walking around and remembering by the Famous Socratic method.
The Socratic school of management is born note bene.
My vote for the socratic manager of the 21st century is Ricardo Semler(1). the CEO and majority owner of Semler & Company a Brazilian company best known for its radical form of industrial democracy and corporate re-engineering
Another sensai in the remembering of what we come to know again is Paulo Friere(2) who was also Brazilian.
remember Freire’s strong aversion to the teacher-student dichotomy.
No Tyrants they.
Another minstrel and poet for the muse of the new Socratic school of Management is Robert Smith, Front man of The Cure. I was invited to their Show headlining Roskilde last night by Roger O’donnel their Keyboard player a friend of mine, Roger reminds me of Timotheus,(3) Harmonides teacher. Who counsels his pupils not to seek the wisdom of crowds as a crutch for their own self esteem, better, to be admired by ones peers, secure in your own motivations of your trueself.
I do hope the reference is not construed as ´Jumpin on someone elses train ´
Moving swiftly on to the point about our Poet our Marsyas(4) and his Guitar, not Flute
Emblazoned on Robers Schekter Guitar.
“CITIZENS NOT SUBJECTS:”
Pythagoras. You will study music and geometry.
First Dealer. A charming recipe! The way to be wise: learn the guitar.
And a final Word From Max Ehrman whośe Desiderata(4) sent me in search of a cure for my own amnesia.
“Go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence.
As far as possible, without surrender, be on good terms with all persons. Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even to the dull and the ignorant, they too have their story. Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit.”
In isolated elites remote politicians and financiers in far off lands what can they ever hope to be reminded of. Lets remember not to forget our own worth.
(1) reference wiki/Ricardo_Semler
(2) reference .wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulo_Freire
(3)Reference sacred-texts.com/cla/luc/wl2/wl208.htm
(4)Reference wikipedia. Marsyas
(5) Reference .businessballs.com/desideratapoem.htm
Graeber CIA- no push back from me on that,
The Rojava anarchist movement?, spook asset or Spook operative etc.
The picture is one I posted to demonstrate David G and Janis Varafoukis sniffing and enjoying the others narratives a reference to Da vincis observation on Status in Dogs.
October 30, 2017
I wanted to Post some links to some interesting article from a New online magazine (new to me at any rate) Called ROAR , which bills itself as a Magazine for and by Anarchists. This account of attempted ” Turning” of Carine Hutesbauts organisation is I think very relevant in wondering where did ROAR come from, is there a possibility that as with Say VICE Magazine its content will be edited and sanitised as controlled opposition.
See the links to the Writing of Dr Stuart Jeanee Brammal on these matters for some more examples of what my suspicions of new Glossy publications are.
I am especially suspicious given the Involvement of or, Latching on to, of David Graeber and the CIA involvement with Rohojva and suspicions of ZIONIST infiltration into the PKK Kurdish Cause and other Kurdish causes.
Ford Foundation and other foundations as “conduits,” “pass-throughs,” and “fronts” to disguise CIA funding for domestic operations . Robert Kennedy and JFK Ghosts of Revolutions Past?
Controlled Opposition, Glossy Anarchy, ROar Magazine and Caution advised "Open Mind" Conference.
Does the CIA Fund Both the Right and the Left?
The Most Revolutionary Act: Memoir of an American Refugee describes how FBI harassment led a 54 year old psychiatrist, single mother activist, to close my 25 year Seattle practice to begin a new life in New Zealand. It begins by describing the fifteen years of covert harassment I experienced when I used my financial and social position, as a doctor, to assist two former Black Panthers who had occupied an abandoned school to transform it into an African American Museum. What began as unrelenting phone harassment and illegal break-ins, progressed to six attempts on my life and an affair with an undercover agent who railroaded me into a psychiatric hospital.
Are the Kurdish People Patsies for the Greater Israel Plan?
British film-maker killed by Isis militants in Syria
Mehmet Aksoy, from London, was working as a press officer for Kurdish forces in Raqqa when military base was attacked
https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/?s=are+Kurdish
reference voltairenet.org/article
“Rojava, not all that it seems?”
April 30, 2020
Double agents, turncoats and traitors, It Seemed so to him. #Shiva #Kennedy #VaccineDisinfo #FakeNews #WrongKindofGreen #WrongKindofVaccine #FusionDoctrine #CovidPurpose @wiki_ballot #4Pamphleteers @GrubStreetJorno @wiki_ballot @financialeyes @JoeBlob20
Infiltration and controlled opposition are all part and parcel of the Fusion doctrine.
The present generation of Spooks sees the general population not as citizens who they are serving to protect but as the enemy of the so-called Elite who they actually serve.
I consider myself to be part of the Establishment, I am a patriotic Briton and a Welshman. I am a Jew for Jesus with a simple non-conformist faith in the Love of God. As such I do not accept any notion of “My country right or wrong”. As an Anarchist I accept no lord or master and believe in self-ownership.
I accept that the true motivations of others can never be known to me, I can only be known and know, by my own actions and the evidence I witness from the actions of others, actions do after all speak louder than words, written or Spoken.
April 14, 2017
GATEKEEPERS, CHOMSKY, STRAWMEN AND JAMES CORBET, ´ÍT SEEMED SO TO HIM.”
I really Like the Corbett Report.I always Approach it with an open mind and leave it with an open mind and always having visited I have fed my curiosity, I have a similar attitude to Noam Chomsky´s public lectures and writings.Epictetus is a famous stoic philosopher his enchiridion (handbook) offers much practical advice to bearing the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. Quite apt to the current discourse is this. 42. When any person harms you, or speaks badly of you, remember that he acts or speaks from a supposition of its being his duty. Now, it is not possible that he should follow what appears right to you, but what appears so to himself. Therefore, if he judges from a wrong appearance, he is the person hurt, since he too is the person deceived. For if anyone should suppose a true proposition to be false, the proposition is not hurt, but he who is deceived about it. Setting out, then, from these principles, you will meekly bear a person who reviles you, for you will say upon every occasion, “It seemed so to him.”
reference democracy-discourse-epictetus-stoicism.html
reference red-lines-settled-science-end-of.html
reference signs-symbols-stories-language.html
On Gate keepers and so Forth I highly recommend this on Line E Book.
reference ford-foundation-and-other-foundations.html
Reference stuartjeannebramhall.com 21st century revolution free ebook
As I said already, I really enjoy the Corbett Report.
AN interjected edit follows from Roger Lewis”
“As with David Graeber I owe an equal intellectual debt to Noam Chomsky, both are now subject to calling out , controlled opposition are they or are they not? The same accusations are also levelled against James corbett,
this recent comment on Off Guardian for instance.
WATCH: You Are The Power – #SolutionsWatch
Aloysius May 30, 2025 6:55 PM
“I believe it was Noam Chomsky who first broached the idea of “Controlled opposition.” Or maybe it was his co-author. Probably. Dull term, though. Something catchier might catch on better. “Phony baloney revolutionaries” perhaps?
there are many examples of this sort of thing C J Hopkins ( add one of your own or several)
This is a wonderfull way of obscuring the Truth which they both have spoken and continue to speak. Corbets “how big oil conquered the world for instance”
seen in the following screen shot in the context of the Going Direct paradigm mind map
It ocurred to me a few days ago when I was writing my full money enchelada post and Myths Lies and Oil wars post that The Assertion and legal actions brought against Oil companies for “ Covering up, climate change research” similar to Tabacco research and links to cancer” , is a wonderful bait and swith away form the Petro dollar weapons coalition as Bishler and Nitzen term it.
Still about oil?
“The key stylized patterns we discovered more than twenty years ago – along with other regularities we have uncovered since then – remain pretty much unchanged: (1) conflict in the region continues to correlate tightly with the differential profits of the Weapondollar-Petrodollar Coalition, particularly the oil companies; (2) dominant capital continues to depend on stagflation to substitute for declining corporate amalgamation; and (3) capitalists the world over now need inflation to offset the spectre of debt deflation”.
HOW THE US USES WAR TO PROTECT THE DOLLAR
A house divided against itself can not stand. Remember that and Know well that the forces of the State know it only too well . for them, (T H E Y , The Hierarchy that enslaves you), Machiavelli’s The Prince and George Orwells 1984 are both instruction manuals.
ESCAPING THE EU EGREGOR MATRIX-ASSISTED BY PROF. VICTOR EFIMOV.EVERY CITY OR HOUSE DIVIDED AGAINST ITSELF SHALL NOT STAND.» (MATTHEW, 12:25).
George Barda and Extinction Rebellion a case study in infiltration.
reference to //compassionate-revolution.net/about-us
Back to the comments Thread.
Then Reason really doesn't mean that much to you. Reason is all we have because it is the accurate patterning of cause and effect, and cause and effect is all that the universe has.
I'm not a fan of Tim Morgan either. He kicked me out too in short order because he fears systematic (Socratic) reasoning, and prefers to cosplay up on his little soapbox in front of his followers. What else is new?
Gail's a good woman who's willing to change and grow in Reason despite her years. That's a rarity. I recommend that you lurk at her main site. Systems theory takes awhile.
What reason does or does not mean to me is of no consequence to anyone but me.
The main reason I am resisting shooting the breeze is that I have a business trip to the UK in a fortnight and my Daughters graduation this Thursday. My ficus is very much on my family and business , doing stiff rather than talking about it.
I see you read Michael Kowaleck, Michael is I think better placed than I to go into the weeds on all of this, much deeper than I can tread I am afraid deffo above my pay grade.
Keep well and be well
Rog
You too, Rog. Good luck to you and your family during Collapse.
A collapse is not inevitable, an engineered collapse is not possible if not plausibly deniable. Lihop and mihop are acronyms for Let it happen on purpose or make it happen on purpose.
The 2008 financial crisis was avoidable and the response to it negligent/corrupt .
The 2019 Event 201 was again at best an exaggeration and at worse a mihop with a hugely negligent response.
The fear of a collapse is almost as usefull to those gaming the global financial system Fear Doubt and Uncertainty FUD coupled to FOMO fear of missing out cause irrational “over exuberance “(greenspan) or “madness of crowds” (mac kay ).
I accept and realise that events such as the bronze age collapse or the medievil year without sun can happen and may happen again, there's a massive solar stor. Today for instance which cause volcanic and seismic activity hugely destructive locally and sometimes regionally and less often even rarely globally.
Millinerianism is a thing personally I am not persuaded by the various flavours on offer.
Desiderata by Max Ehrman.
Desiderata: Original Text
This is the original text from the book where Desiderata was first published.
Go placidly amid the noise and the haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence. As far as possible, without surrender, be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even to the dull and the ignorant; they too have their story.
Avoid loud and aggressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit. If you compare yourself with others, you may become vain or bitter, for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.
Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans. Keep interested in your own career, however humble; it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time.
Exercise caution in your business affairs, for the world is full of trickery. But let this not blind you to what virtue there is; many persons strive for high ideals, and everywhere life is full of heroism.
Be yourself. Especially do not feign affection. Neither be cynical about love; for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment, it is as perennial as the grass.
Take kindly the counsel of the years, gracefully surrendering the things of youth.
Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune. But do not distress yourself with dark imaginings. Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness.
Beyond a wholesome discipline, be gentle with yourself. You are a child of the universe no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here.
And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should. Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be. And whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life, keep peace in your soul. With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be cheerful. Strive to be happy.
by Max Ehrmann ©1927
The Welsh incident
By Robert Graves
Read by Richard Burton.
Welsh Incident (1929) by Robert Graves
But that was nothing to what things came out
From the sea-caves of Criccieth yonder.'
'What were they? Mermaids? dragons? ghosts?'
'Nothing at all of any things like that.'
'What were they, then?'
'All sorts of queer things,
Things never seen or heard or written about,
Very strange, un-Welsh, utterly peculiar
Things. Oh, solid enough they seemed to touch,
Had anyone dared it. Marvellous creation,
All various shapes and sizes, and no sizes,
All new, each perfectly unlike his neighbour,
Though all came moving slowly out together.'
'Describe just one of them.'
'I am unable.'
'What were their colours?'
'Mostly nameless colours,
Colours you'd like to see; but one was puce
Or perhaps more like crimson, but not purplish.
Some had no colour.'
'Tell me, had they legs?'
'Not a leg or foot among them that I saw.'
'But did these things come out in any order?'
What o'clock was it? What was the day of the week?
Who else was present? How was the weather?'
'I was coming to that. It was half-past three
On Easter Tuesday last. The sun was shining.
The Harlech Silver Band played Marchog Jesu
On thrity-seven shimmering instruments,
Collecting for Caernarvon's (Fever) Hospital Fund.
The populations of Pwllheli, Criccieth,
Portmadoc, Borth, Tremadoc, Penrhyndeudraeth,
Were all assembled. Criccieth's mayor addressed them
First in good Welsh and then in fluent English,
Twisting his fingers in his chain of office,
Welcoming the things. They came out on the sand,
Not keeping time to the band, moving seaward
Silently at a snail's pace. But at last
The most odd, indescribable thing of all
Which hardly one man there could see for wonder
Did something recognizably a something.'
'Well, what?'
'It made a noise.'
'A frightening noise?'
'No, no.'
'A musical noise? A noise of scuffling?'
'No, but a very loud, respectable noise ---
Like groaning to oneself on Sunday morning
In Chapel, close before the second psalm.'
'What did the mayor do?'
'I was coming to that.'
What happened next?
I was coming to that.
Best
Rog
See also
Going Direct isn’t working Part 3
Black rock and the rise of algorithmic control
The Full Money enchilada
And Myths Lies and Oil Wars.
QUEUE HERE. SYSYPHUS, QUE OF CUES, CUE QUE, COUP DE QUE.
Sisyphus pushed his boulder,
The path smooth both ways
The same incline repeated
Parmenides like determination.
—
Prometheus chained over the hill
Willing that Sisyphus may succeed
panta rhei, alike to his own flame.
Both legends for deaf ears.
—
Heraclitus his ebb and flow
Crying metaphors to deaf masses
Sobbing similes to Blind tyranny
Calvary the summit to that bluff.
—
Maimonides saw each contradiction
Each species of deafness, Loud
Each species of blindness, Dark
All no less perplexed than the next.
—
Yet another Sisyphus rolls
Yet another Prometheus reveals
Yet another Heraclitus cry’s
Yet another Maimonides interprets
—-
Ancient and modern queuing
Missed cues and repeated lines
A dialogue of the divine comedy
Stockaded in linguistic prison walls.
—-
Plus ca change plus ca meme chose.
Roger G Lewis 2022.
#QED