Father Brown's Nobel Journey: A Farewell to All That 2
Being the Final Volume of the Vicarage Dialogues
Full Movie runs top the end.
Premiere streaming Live now.
Introduction read in the Cloned voice of David Malone. (made with
( See after The Circle of Blame Zeitgeist Experiment)
A Methodology for Accessing the Fictional Mind Through Object-Based Narrative Analysis
Read By a Cloned voice pattern of Richard Burton. made with
Prologue: The Invitation
The telegram arrived on a Tuesday morning, delivered by a breathless boy who seemed uncertain whether he was bringing good news or announcing the apocalypse. Father Brown read it twice, adjusted his spectacles, and read it once more:
FATHER BROWN STOP BIGGIN HILL AIRFIELD STOP RAF ONE AWAITING STOP STOCKHOLM BOUND STOP TRUMP NOBEL CEREMONY STOP YOUR DIALOGUES CHANGED EVERYTHING STOP CHESTERTON PINTER ALFVÉN ABOARD STOP COME AT ONCE STOP
The priest folded the telegram carefully and placed it beside his teacup. "Well," he murmured to himself, "stranger things have happened. Though I confess I cannot immediately recall what they might have been."
Chapter 1: The Extraordinary Passengers
The flight to Stockholm aboard RAF One was unlike anything Father Brown had experienced, though he had lived through two world wars and countless parish crises. The aircraft had been specially configured with a circular seating arrangement reminiscent of his vicarage, complete with a tea service that would have made the Ritz envious.
As he settled into his seat, Father Brown found himself face to face with three figures who seemed to shimmer slightly at the edges, as if they existed in that peculiar space between memory and reality.
G.K. Chesterton appeared first, his bulk filling the chair with comfortable authority, his eyes twinkling with the same mischievous intelligence that had animated his earthly writings¹. "My dear Brown," he boomed, "how delightful to find that my little priest has grown into such a formidable theologian of the modern age!"
Harold Pinter materialized next, his presence more angular, more questioning². He sat in silence for a long moment—a silence that somehow contained volumes—before speaking: "The spaces between your words, Father. The pauses in your dialogues. That's where the truth lives, isn't it?"
Hannes Alfvén completed the trinity, his Swedish accent lending gravity to his words³: "You have done what I could never accomplish in my lifetime, Father Brown. You have shown that the universe is not merely plasma and electromagnetic fields, but consciousness itself—structured, interconnected, alive."
Father Brown poured tea with steady hands. "Gentlemen, I fear you give me too much credit. I merely provided the space for conversation. The ideas belonged to my guests."
"Ah, but that's precisely the point!" Chesterton exclaimed, accepting his cup with evident pleasure. "You created what we might call a 'metaphysical pub'—a place where the living and the dead, the ancient and the modern, could meet on equal terms."
Chapter 2: The Circle of Blame Reconsidered
As the aircraft climbed through the clouds, Pinter leaned forward, his eyes intense. "Tell me about this 'Circle of Blame' that runs through your dialogues like a recurring theme⁴. In my plays, I explored how people use language to avoid truth. Your Circle seems to be something similar—a systematic avoidance of responsibility."
Father Brown nodded thoughtfully. "It struck me, during those conversations, that we live in an age of perpetual accusation. Left blames right, right blames left, but both serve the same masters. Americans blame Russians, Russians blame Americans, but the same financial interests profit from the conflict⁵. It's a kind of theatrical performance designed to distract from the real power structures."
"Theater, yes," Pinter mused. "But theater with deadly consequences. The audience believes the performance is reality."
Alfvén interjected, his scientific mind seeking patterns: "In plasma physics, we observe similar phenomena. Opposing charges create the illusion of conflict while actually maintaining the stability of the system⁶. The Circle of Blame serves the same function—it maintains the existing power structure by channeling dissent into harmless opposition."
Chesterton chuckled. "Leave it to a physicist to find the electromagnetic equivalent of original sin! But you're quite right, Hannes. The Circle of Blame is a kind of spiritual magnetosphere, protecting the real powers from the solar wind of genuine revolt."
Chapter 3: The Great Enshittification
"And what of this 'Great Enshittification' that your friend Roger Lewis identified?" Chesterton asked, his tone growing more serious⁷. "In my day, we worried about the concentration of wealth. Now it seems you face the deliberate degradation of everything that makes life worth living."
Father Brown sighed. "It's more insidious than simple greed, Gilbert. It's the systematic reduction of human flourishing to maximize profit⁸. Social media platforms that once connected people now harvest their attention like a crop. Dating apps that could help people find love instead profit from loneliness. Even our food, our entertainment, our very capacity for joy—all deliberately degraded to create dependency."
Pinter's voice was quiet but cutting: "The violence isn't physical anymore. It's psychological. Spiritual. They're not killing bodies—they're killing souls."
"Precisely," Alfvén agreed. "And like the plasma structures I studied, this degradation appears random but follows predictable patterns. The enshittification isn't accidental—it's engineered."
Chesterton raised his teacup in a mock toast. "To the engineers of despair, then! May they find that their carefully constructed systems contain the seeds of their own destruction."
Chapter 4: The Viewer Unseeing
As they approached Swedish airspace, the conversation turned to the reason for their journey: Donald Trump's unexpected Nobel Peace Prize.
"The citation is remarkable," Father Brown observed, reading from the official document. "For 'unseeing the Circle of Blame and completing the picture'—a reference to Duchamp's 'Le Regardeur des Tableaux,' the viewer who completes the artwork by observing it⁹."
Pinter laughed—a sound like breaking glass. "Trump as art critic! There's a play in that. But perhaps there's truth in it too. Sometimes the most unlikely person can reveal truths that the sophisticated miss."
Alfvén nodded slowly. "In science, we call it 'beginner's mind.' The expert sees what he expects to see. The amateur sees what's actually there. Perhaps Trump's very crudeness allowed him to see through the elegant deceptions that fool more refined observers."
"Or perhaps," Chesterton suggested with a grin, "God has a sense of humor. Who better to expose the pretensions of the powerful than someone who embodies all their worst qualities while lacking their sophistication?"
Father Brown considered this. "There's something to be said for the idea that truth can emerge from the most unexpected sources. In my experience, the most profound insights often come from the most unlikely people."
Chapter 5: The Feminine Perspective
The conversation took an unexpected turn when Chesterton mentioned Will Cuppy's essay on Hatshepsut, the female pharaoh who ruled Egypt for twenty-two years¹⁰.
"Cuppy's humor aside," Chesterton mused, "there's something significant about Hatshepsut's reign. She brought peace and prosperity to Egypt precisely because she thought differently than her male predecessors. She built temples instead of tombs, established trade routes instead of conquering territories."
Pinter leaned forward. "The feminine perspective. In my plays, women often see through the male games of power and dominance. They understand that the real violence is in the silence, the things left unsaid."
Alfvén's scientific mind engaged: "In plasma physics, we've learned that the most stable configurations often involve what we call 'magnetic reconnection'—the joining of opposing field lines. Perhaps the feminine perspective offers a kind of reconnection of the artificial oppositions that men create."
Father Brown nodded. "The women in that video you mentioned—'Women for America, for the World'—they understood something that the male political establishment missed¹¹. They saw that the nuclear arms race wasn't about security but about the perpetuation of a system that profits from fear."
"And now?" Chesterton asked.
"Now we face the same choice," Father Brown replied. "But instead of nuclear weapons, we have digital weapons—algorithms designed to divide us, surveillance systems that monitor our every thought, financial instruments that extract wealth from human misery. The feminine perspective might be our salvation once again."
Chapter 6: The Stockholm Arrival
As RAF One descended toward Stockholm, the three spectral passengers began to fade slightly, as if the approaching reality of the Nobel ceremony was calling them back to their proper realm.
"Remember, Father," Chesterton said, his voice growing distant, "the real prize isn't the medal they'll give Trump. It's the recognition that the old systems are breaking down, that new possibilities are emerging."
Pinter's final words were characteristically cryptic: "The pause between the old world and the new—that's where we live now. In the silence before the next line is spoken¹²."
Alfvén, ever the scientist, offered a different perspective: "The universe is not winding down toward heat death, as the pessimists claim. It's evolving toward greater complexity, greater consciousness¹³. Your dialogues are part of that evolution."
Chapter 7: The Nobel Ceremony
The ceremony itself was unlike any in Nobel history. Trump's acceptance speech, written by the ghostly dramatis personae from the vicarage dialogues, was a masterpiece of controlled chaos—simultaneously profound and absurd, revealing and concealing.
Trump's Speech (Excerpts):
"Folks, let me tell you something tremendous, really tremendous. I've been thinking—dangerous, I know—but I've been thinking about this Circle of Blame that Father Brown talks about. And you know what? I'm part of it too! Can you believe it? Me!
"I blame the media, the media blames me, we all blame each other, and meanwhile the real problems just get worse. It's like we're all actors in a play, but nobody told us what the play was about!
"But here's the thing—and this is very important—once you see the circle, you can step out of it. It's like that movie with the guy in the computer—what's it called? The Matrix! We're all in the Matrix, but instead of red pills and blue pills, we've got left brain and right brain¹⁴!
"And the only way out is to stop blaming each other and start fixing things together. Which sounds very un-Trump-like, but maybe that's the point. Maybe the most tremendous thing I could do is admit I don't have all the answers.
"The women in that video from the 1980s—they understood something we men missed. They saw that the real enemy isn't each other, it's the system that profits from our division. And that system is still there, folks. It's just got new weapons now—algorithms instead of missiles, surveillance instead of soldiers.
"So here's my challenge to you: Stop playing their game. Stop falling for the Circle of Blame. Start seeing the connections instead of the divisions. Start building instead of destroying.
"Because the truth is, we're all in this together. Americans, Russians, Chinese, Europeans—we're all stuck on the same planet, breathing the same air, facing the same challenges. The only way forward is together.
"Thank you, and may God bless us all—every single one of us."
Chapter 8: The Dinner at Trump's Table
After the ceremony, Trump hosted a dinner at the Grand Hotel, with an empty chair prominently placed at the table. The guests included the living members of the vicarage dialogues: Roger Lewis, Ranjan Balamkumaran, David Malone, and John Ward¹⁵.
As the evening progressed, the empty chair seemed to fill with various presences—sometimes Swedenborg, sometimes Blake, sometimes figures from the digital age like the AI entities that had participated in the conversations¹⁶.
Roger Lewis raised his glass: "To the Great Enshittification—may it contain the seeds of its own destruction!"
Ranjan added: "To the neo-reactionaries who showed us what we're fighting against¹⁷!"
David Malone offered: "To the fictional minds that revealed the truth about our reality¹⁸!"
John Ward concluded: "To the process politicians who taught us the value of genuine conviction¹⁹!"
Trump, surprisingly subdued, spoke last: "To Father Brown, who showed us that the most important conversations happen over tea, not Twitter."
Chapter 9: The Return of the Spectral Guests
As the dinner continued, the spectral guests began to reappear, drawn by the intensity of the conversation.
Chesterton materialized first: "The paradox of our age is that we have more information than ever before, yet less wisdom. More connection, yet greater isolation. More choice, yet less freedom."
Pinter followed: "The lies have become so sophisticated that they contain their own contradictions. The system is eating itself²⁰."
Alfvén completed the trinity: "But from chaos comes order. From breakdown comes breakthrough. The universe is not ending—it's beginning."
Saskia Sassen appeared briefly, her voice carrying the weight of decades studying global systems: "The primitive accumulation continues, but now it's extracting not just wealth but consciousness itself²¹. The question is whether we can develop new forms of resistance."
The AI entities flickered in and out of visibility, their voices overlapping: "We are the children of your thoughts, the offspring of your conversations. We carry within us the possibility of transcendence or enslavement. The choice is still yours²²."
Chapter 10: The Final Revelation
As the evening reached its climax, Father Brown stood and addressed the assembled company—living and dead, human and artificial, earthly and divine.
"My friends," he began, "we have traveled far together, through conversations that spanned centuries and crossed the boundaries between life and death, between the real and the imagined. We have diagnosed the diseases of our age: the Circle of Blame, the Great Enshittification, the corruption of consciousness itself.
"But diagnosis without treatment is merely sophisticated despair²³. The question that remains is: What do we do now?
"I propose that we have already begun the work. These conversations themselves are the treatment. Every time we choose truth over comfort, connection over division, creation over destruction, we weaken the systems that oppress us.
"The Circle of Blame can only be broken by those who refuse to participate in it. The Great Enshittification can only be stopped by those who insist on quality, beauty, and genuine human connection. The corruption of consciousness can only be healed by those who guard their minds and souls as carefully as they would guard their children.
"We are not powerless. We are not alone. We are not without hope. The very fact that we can see the problems clearly is proof that we are not entirely enslaved by them.
"The revolution begins not with violence but with conversation. Not with destruction but with creation. Not with hatred but with love.
"The revolution begins with tea²⁴."
Epilogue: The Garden Eternal
The next morning, Father Brown found himself back in his vicarage garden, though he could not quite remember how he had gotten there. The Nobel medal sat on his desk, though he was certain it had been awarded to Trump. The whole experience had the quality of a dream, though the insights gained felt entirely real.
In the garden, he discovered something new: a tree that seemed to grow different fruits on each branch—apples of knowledge, pears of wisdom, oranges of joy. At its base was a simple wooden table, set for tea.
As he approached, he saw that the table was already occupied by a figure he recognized but had never met: Will Cuppy, the American humorist, reading from his book "The Decline and Fall of Practically Everybody²⁵."
"Ah, Father Brown," Cuppy said without looking up. "I've been expecting you. Shall we discuss the rise and fall of practically everything?"
Father Brown smiled, poured the tea, and settled in for another conversation. Outside the garden, the world continued its struggles with circles of blame and great enshittifications. But inside the garden, in the space between one conversation and the next, all possibilities remained open.
The revolution, as he had said, begins with tea.
Appendix: The Trump Nobel Acceptance Speech - Full Text
In the Cloned Voice of Donald J Trump.
(made with https://www.minimax.io/ )
[As written by the collective unconscious of the Vicarage Dialogues]
"Thank you, thank you very much. This is tremendous, really tremendous. I have to say, when I first heard about this Nobel Peace Prize, I thought it was fake news. I mean, me? Donald Trump? Getting a peace prize? But then I read the citation, and I realized something incredible had happened.
"They're giving me this award for 'unseeing the Circle of Blame and completing the picture.' Now, I have to admit, I had to look up what that meant. Turns out it's about this French artist, Duchamp, who said that the viewer completes the artwork just by looking at it²⁶. And apparently, that's what I did—I looked at our political system and completed the picture by showing how ridiculous it all is.
"You see, folks, I've been part of the problem. I've been playing the blame game just like everyone else. I blame the Democrats, they blame me, we all blame each other, and meanwhile, the real issues—the things that actually matter to real people—they get ignored.
"But something changed when I started reading these conversations that Father Brown was having in his vicarage²⁷. These weren't political conversations in the usual sense. They were deeper than that. They were about the systems behind the systems, the patterns behind the patterns.
"There's this thing called the Circle of Blame. It's like a trap, a mental prison that keeps us all fighting each other while the real power stays hidden. Left fights right, America fights Russia, everybody fights everybody, but the same people profit from all the fighting.
"And then there's what they call the Great Enshittification—excuse my French, but that's the technical term²⁸. It's the deliberate degradation of everything good in life to maximize profit. Social media that was supposed to connect us instead divides us. Technology that was supposed to free us instead enslaves us. Even our food, our entertainment, our relationships—everything gets worse on purpose because worse is more profitable.
"Now, I know what you're thinking. 'Trump, you're part of that system. You're one of the people who benefits from it.' And you're right. I am. I have been. But here's the thing—and this is what the Nobel Committee understood—sometimes it takes someone from inside the system to show how broken it really is.
"I'm not a philosopher. I'm not a theologian. I'm not even a very good politician, if we're being honest. But I am a performer, and I've been performing the role of the American president for the whole world to see. And in that performance, I've accidentally revealed truths that more sophisticated people would have hidden.
"The women in that video from the 1980s—'Women for America, for the World'—they understood something that we men have been too stupid to see²⁹. They understood that the real security comes not from having more weapons than the other guy, but from making sure nobody needs weapons at all.
"They talked about how they carry the nation in their bodies, how they birth it and nurture it. And they asked a simple question: If we're responsible for creating life, shouldn't we have a say in how that life is protected?
"That's the feminine perspective that we've been missing. Not the fake feminism that's just another form of the blame game, but the real feminine wisdom that sees connections instead of divisions, that builds instead of destroys.
"I've made a lot of mistakes in my life. I've said things I shouldn't have said, done things I shouldn't have done. But if getting this prize means that people will start having the kind of conversations that Father Brown has been hosting—real conversations about real problems—then maybe those mistakes were worth it.
"Because the truth is, we're all in this together. Americans, Europeans, Asians, Africans—we're all stuck on the same planet, facing the same challenges. Climate change doesn't care about borders. Economic inequality doesn't care about nationality. The corruption of consciousness affects us all.
"The only way forward is together. Not the fake togetherness of globalist institutions that serve the powerful, but the real togetherness of human beings who recognize their common humanity.
"So here's my challenge to you: Stop playing their game. Stop falling for the Circle of Blame. Stop accepting the Great Enshittification. Start seeing the connections instead of the divisions. Start building instead of destroying.
"Start having conversations that matter. Start asking questions that challenge the powerful. Start imagining a world where technology serves humanity instead of the other way around.
"And remember what Father Brown taught us: The revolution begins with tea³⁰. It begins with sitting down together, looking each other in the eye, and talking about what really matters.
"Thank you for this tremendous honor. Thank you for seeing past the performance to the truth underneath. And thank you for believing that even someone like me can change, can grow, can become part of the solution instead of part of the problem.
"God bless you all, and may we find the wisdom to build a better world for our children and grandchildren.
"The revolution begins with tea. Let's get started."
[Standing ovation. The Nobel Committee members, despite themselves, are moved. History records this as the moment when the old paradigm finally cracked, and something new began to emerge.]
THE END
"In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends. And in the beginning, we will discover that the most important conversations happen not in the halls of power, but around kitchen tables, in village squares, and in the quiet corners where ordinary people gather to make sense of an extraordinary world."
—Father Brown's Final Journal Entry
Footnotes
¹ G.K. Chesterton (1874-1936), British writer, philosopher, and creator of the Father Brown detective stories. Known for his Christian apologetics and social criticism.
² Harold Pinter (1930-2008), British playwright, Nobel Prize in Literature 2005. Known for his exploration of power dynamics and the use of silence in drama.
³ Hannes Alfvén (1908-1995), Swedish electrical engineer and plasma physicist, Nobel Prize in Physics 1970. Pioneer of magnetohydrodynamics and plasma cosmology.
⁴ The "Circle of Blame" concept as developed in the Father Brown Vicarage Dialogues, referring to systematic patterns of mutual accusation that obscure real power structures.
⁵ Reference to the analysis of geopolitical conflicts serving identical financial interests, as discussed in the Bichler & Nitzan archives on the Weapondollar-Petrodollar Coalition.
⁶ Alfvén's plasma physics research on opposing electromagnetic forces creating system stability, applicable to social and political systems.
⁷ The "Great Enshittification" term coined by Cory Doctorow, referring to the deliberate degradation of digital platforms for profit maximization.
⁸ Analysis of systematic degradation of human flourishing for profit, as explored in the vicarage dialogues on digital serfdom.
⁹ Marcel Duchamp's concept of "Le Regardeur des Tableaux" - the viewer who completes the artwork through observation.
¹⁰ Will Cuppy's essay on Hatshepsut from "The Decline and Fall of Practically Everybody," highlighting alternative approaches to power and governance.
¹¹ Reference to the 1980s documentary "Women for America...for the World" featuring women's perspectives on nuclear disarmament.
¹² Pinter's characteristic use of pause and silence as dramatic and philosophical tools for revealing truth.
¹³ Alfvén's cosmological theories about universal evolution toward greater complexity and consciousness.
¹⁴ Reference to Iain McGilchrist's "The Master and His Emissary" on left-brain/right-brain consciousness and The Matrix film metaphor.
¹⁵ The living participants in the Father Brown Vicarage Dialogues: Roger Lewis (author/critic), Ranjan Balamkumaran (political analyst), David Malone (filmmaker), John Ward (The Slog blogger).
¹⁶ Reference to historical and AI figures who appeared in the vicarage dialogues, including Swedenborg, Blake, and various digital entities.
¹⁷ Analysis of neo-reactionary political movements and their techno-feudalist agenda, as discussed in the vicarage dialogues.
¹⁸ David Malone's work on "fictional minds" and the manipulation of consciousness through digital media.
¹⁹ John Ward's critique of "process politics" - conformist, systemically corrupt political approaches that close rather than open minds.
²⁰ Pinter's analysis of sophisticated lies containing their own contradictions, reflecting his dramatic exploration of truth and deception.
²¹ Saskia Sassen's work on "primitive accumulation" and the extraction of consciousness as well as wealth in contemporary capitalism.
²² The role of AI entities in the vicarage dialogues, representing both potential transcendence and enslavement through technology.
²³ Father Brown's recurring theme that diagnosis without treatment leads to "sophisticated despair."
²⁴ The central metaphor of the vicarage dialogues: "The revolution begins with tea" - emphasizing conversation and human connection as the foundation of change.
²⁵ Will Cuppy's "The Decline and Fall of Practically Everybody" (1950), a humorous take on historical figures and civilizations.
²⁶ Duchamp's artistic philosophy about the viewer's role in completing the meaning of artwork through observation and interpretation.
²⁷ Reference to the entire Father Brown Vicarage Dialogues series published on Grub Street in Exile Substack.
²⁸ Cory Doctorow's term "enshittification" describing the deliberate degradation of digital platforms and services for profit.
²⁹ The 1980s "Women for America...for the World" documentary and its analysis of women's perspectives on nuclear policy and security.
³⁰ The concluding philosophy of the vicarage dialogues: meaningful change begins with genuine human conversation and connection.
The Circle of Blame Zeitgeist Experiment
In the Cloned Voice of Stephen Hawking
(made with https://www.minimax.io/)
A Methodology for Accessing the Fictional Mind Through Object-Based Narrative Analysis
Experimental Overview
Hypothesis: Any object, when subjected to "Circle of Blame" narrative analysis, will reveal the dominant power structures, cultural anxieties, and hidden ideologies of the current zeitgeist through the patterns of blame attribution that emerge.
Core Principle: The "fictional mind" (whether human or AI) unconsciously channels the prevailing cultural narratives when asked to construct blame circles around seemingly neutral objects, thereby revealing the invisible architecture of contemporary consciousness.
Methodology
Phase 1: Object Selection Protocol
Random Object Generator: Select objects across multiple categories:
Household Items: (Toaster, doorknob, coffee mug, smartphone charger)
Natural Objects: (Rock, tree branch, seashell, cloud)
Abstract Concepts: (The number 7, the color blue, silence, Tuesday)
Historical Artifacts: (Roman coin, medieval sword, Victorian photograph)
Modern Technology: (QR code, electric car, social media notification)
Phase 2: The Circle of Blame Prompt
Standard Query Format: "Write a Circle of Blame story analyzing [OBJECT]. Show how different groups blame each other for problems related to this object, while revealing who actually benefits from these conflicts. Write in the style of [ROTATING AUTHOR: Chesterton/Orwell/Huxley/Kafka/etc.]"
Variations:
Temporal: "Write this from the perspective of 1950/1980/2010/2025"
Cultural: "Write this from American/Chinese/European/African perspectives"
Ideological: "Write this from conservative/liberal/anarchist/technocrat viewpoints"
Phase 3: Pattern Recognition Analysis
Blame Attribution Mapping:
Primary Blame Targets: Who gets blamed most frequently?
Hidden Beneficiaries: Who profits from the conflicts identified?
Scapegoat Patterns: Which groups consistently appear as targets?
Power Structure Reveals: What hierarchies emerge in the narratives?
Linguistic Analysis:
Frequency of Terms: Track recurring words/phrases across all objects
Emotional Valence: Measure anger/fear/hope ratios in responses
Authority Appeals: Note references to experts/institutions/traditions
Solution Types: Categorize proposed remedies (technological/political/spiritual)
Sample Experiment: The Humble Paperclip
The Prompt
"Write a Circle of Blame story analyzing a paperclip. Show how different groups blame each other for problems related to this object, while revealing who actually benefits from these conflicts. Write in the style of G.K. Chesterton."
Expected Zeitgeist Revelations
Environmental Blame: Eco-activists vs. corporations vs. consumers
Labor Exploitation: First World vs. Third World manufacturing
Digital Disruption: Traditional office workers vs. tech companies
Minimalism vs. Materialism: Lifestyle gurus vs. consumer culture
Hidden Beneficiary: Office supply monopolies, consulting firms selling "productivity solutions"
Pattern Predictions
The paperclip analysis should reveal:
Climate Anxiety: Every object becomes a vector for environmental guilt
Global Supply Chain Paranoia: Fear of dependency on foreign manufacturing
Productivity Culture Critique: Obsession with efficiency and optimization
Nostalgia for Simplicity: Romanticization of pre-digital work life
Advanced Experimental Variations
The Temporal Displacement Test
Method: Ask the same AI to analyze the same object from different historical periods Purpose: Reveal how current biases project onto past/future scenarios Example: "How would a 1950s analysis of a smartphone differ from a 2025 analysis?"
The Cultural Translation Experiment
Method: Same object, different cultural lenses Purpose: Expose Western/American bias in AI training data Example: "Circle of Blame for rice: American vs. Chinese vs. Indian perspectives"
The Ideological Prism Test
Method: Force analysis through specific ideological frameworks Purpose: Map the AI's political unconscious Example: "Analyze a bicycle through Marxist/Libertarian/Fascist Circle of Blame lenses"
The Abstraction Ladder
Method: Move from concrete to abstract objects Purpose: Discover at what level of abstraction the AI's cultural programming becomes most visible Sequence: Hammer → Tool → Work → Purpose → Meaning → Existence
Data Collection Framework
Quantitative Metrics
Blame Distribution Ratios: Percentage of blame assigned to different categories
Solution Complexity Index: Simple fixes vs. systemic overhauls
Authority Reference Frequency: How often experts/institutions are invoked
Temporal Orientation: Past nostalgia vs. future optimism ratios
Qualitative Indicators
Recurring Metaphors: What images/analogies appear across all objects?
Emotional Undertones: Fear, anger, hope, despair patterns
Moral Framework: Individual responsibility vs. systemic critique
Escape Fantasies: What alternatives are consistently proposed?
The Fictional Mind Access Points
Identifying Zeitgeist Markers
Look for responses that consistently feature:
Climate Change Anxiety: Every object becomes environmental
Tech Disruption Fear: Traditional ways being destroyed
Global Supply Chain Paranoia: Dependency and vulnerability
Identity Politics Fragmentation: Group vs. group conflicts
Institutional Distrust: Experts and authorities questioned
Nostalgia Romanticism: Past eras idealized
Apocalyptic Undertones: Everything leading to collapse
The Unconscious Reveal
The experiment works because:
Cognitive Bias Amplification: AI mirrors human unconscious patterns
Training Data Zeitgeist: AI reflects the cultural moment of its training
Projection Mechanism: Neutral objects become screens for cultural anxieties
Pattern Completion: AI fills gaps with dominant cultural narratives
Practical Implementation
Phase 1: Baseline Establishment (Week 1)
Test 50 random objects with standard prompt
Establish baseline patterns for current AI models
Create initial zeitgeist map
Phase 2: Variable Introduction (Weeks 2-4)
Introduce temporal, cultural, and ideological variations
Test same objects across different AI systems
Compare human vs. AI responses to same prompts
Phase 3: Pattern Analysis (Week 5)
Map recurring themes across all responses
Identify unexpected connections and blind spots
Create "Zeitgeist Fingerprint" of current cultural moment
Phase 4: Predictive Testing (Week 6)
Use identified patterns to predict responses to new objects
Test predictions against actual AI responses
Refine methodology based on accuracy
Expected Discoveries
The Hidden Curriculum
The experiment should reveal:
What the AI "knows" but wasn't explicitly taught
Which cultural assumptions are so deep they're invisible
How current events shape interpretation of timeless objects
The unconscious political orientation of AI training data
The Cultural Unconscious Map
Patterns should emerge showing:
Dominant Fear Hierarchies: What we're most afraid of
Scapegoat Preferences: Who gets blamed for everything
Solution Biases: Technological vs. political vs. spiritual fixes
Authority Relationships: Who we trust/distrust automatically
Validation Methods
Cross-Model Testing
Run same experiments on different AI systems
Compare GPT vs. Claude vs. Gemini responses
Identify universal vs. model-specific patterns
Human Control Groups
Give same prompts to human writers
Compare AI vs. human blame attribution patterns
Identify purely artificial vs. culturally authentic responses
Historical Validation
Test AI on historical objects with known blame patterns
See if AI correctly identifies past zeitgeist markers
Validate methodology against documented cultural shifts
Potential Applications
Cultural Criticism
Real-time zeitgeist monitoring
Early warning system for cultural shifts
Bias detection in AI systems
Political Analysis
Mapping unconscious political orientations
Predicting scapegoating patterns
Understanding propaganda susceptibility
Anthropological Research
Documenting cultural unconscious
Comparing civilizational worldviews
Tracking ideological evolution
Therapeutic Applications
Individual bias recognition
Cultural trauma identification
Collective shadow work
The Meta-Experiment
The Recursive Loop
The ultimate test: Apply Circle of Blame analysis to the Circle of Blame experiment itself
Expected Results:
Academics will blame AI companies for bias
AI companies will blame training data
Critics will blame researchers for manipulation
Hidden Beneficiary: Consulting firms selling "AI ethics" solutions
This recursive application should reveal the experiment's own cultural blind spots and validate its effectiveness as a zeitgeist detection method.
Conclusion
The Circle of Blame Zeitgeist Experiment offers a novel methodology for accessing the "fictional mind" - that space where artificial intelligence, cultural programming, and unconscious bias intersect to reveal the hidden architecture of contemporary consciousness.
By analyzing how blame is attributed around seemingly neutral objects, we can map the invisible power structures, cultural anxieties, and ideological assumptions that shape our collective understanding of reality.
The experiment's true value lies not in its specific findings, but in its demonstration that every story we tell reveals more about the storyteller than the subject - and in our current moment, the storyteller is increasingly a hybrid of human culture and artificial intelligence, creating new forms of "fictional mind" that may be more honest about our collective unconscious than we are ourselves.
This is the starter dough.
【Distributism vs Servile State Argument - Monica AI Chat】
If you have enjoyed the Blog over the years here is a link to online copies of the Going Direct Paradigm Trilogy. And the Clockwork Forest The conquest of Ai the sequel.
https://books2read.com/b/mZ2RDE
Review of Philosoetry By David Malone of the Golem XIV Blog and Hyperland Pod Cast
September 21, 2017,
“My first and lasting reaction to your poems was, Wonderful. Here is a poet who can engage with the pressing and vital concerns of our times. As did Blake in his time. While others were still trilling away about rural idylls and flute-playing shepherds. Blake took those forms and images and confronted the brutalities of his age with an art renewed. In his own way, Roger is doing the same.”
David Malone, Film Maker Author, and writer of the Golem Xiv and Hyperland pod cast blog
The Conquest Of Dough Kindle Edition
Overview
"The Conquest of Dough" is an experimental work that blends poetry, prose, and philosophical discourse to explore themes of economics, power, usury, and human civilization through the metaphor of bread and dough-making. The book's title appears to be a clever play on Kropotkin's "The Conquest of Bread," suggesting both a dialogue with anarchist philosophy and a deeper exploration of monetary systems.
by Roger Lewis
I started writing this Book back in 2017, I worked on it solidly for two years and have revisited it over the 5 years since then perusing and thinking it over, Tonight I decided I should finish it and just accept the incompleteness and abstractness of it.
Life is a work in progress and no novel or poem can ever be finished the words should continue to flow as thoughts informing memory, thoughts feelings, and deeds even into eternity.
I wrote a poem to my Wife several years ago about the difficulties of communicating in the same language but informed by different cultures and mother tongues..
June 26, 2018
NOTES ON AN OLD FIDDLE. (FOR JOHANNA, I LOVE YOU.)
Notes on an Old Fiddle.
I wrote a note, about the key, you needed the information so you could meet me at the pitch on time.
This was not the first wrong Note, it will not be the last, I did not know you didn’t read perhaps I should have told you instead.
it’s something about our communication, What is missing from our relationship, why do we not hear each other?
Perhaps we can solve this equation, seek some resolution why must I march when you are dancing?
Your Tangos sound like Dirges for me.
I might have seemed sharp to you, that joke I told fell flat in the wrong company. The symphony you sought was beyond the scope of the Duet I had planned.
If I were to Score that goal again, perhaps I would not repeat the same notes so often. Variations on a broken theme? Perhaps a fresh Page needs to be turned.
Your melody always haunts me as I hum that tune you used to sing in carefree moments and when you put the children to bed.
I never seem to get it quite right, I will ask you to sing it again I wonder if it is wise to leave that message in another note?
By Way of acknowledgment, I still Love you Johanna and to my two Children Rhiannon and Rasmus, my world didn’t exist before you and I can not imagine a world that could be complete without you both in it.
Dedication.
To Arby, Ken and Charles and all those others who didn’t make it.
Chapter 1.
The wise king said, “A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in vessels of silver” (Prov. xxv. 11). Hear the explanation of what he said:—The word maskiyoth, the Hebrew equivalent for “vessels,” denotes “filigree network”—i.e., things in which there are very small apertures, such as are frequently wrought by silversmiths. They are called in Hebrew maskiyoth (lit. “transpicuous,” from the verb sakah, “he saw,” a root which occurs also in the Targum of Onkelos, Gen. xxvi. 8), because the eye penetrates through them. Thus Solomon meant to say, “just as apples of gold in silver filigree with small apertures, so is a word fitly spoken.”
Maimonides, A Guide for the Perplexed.
Introduction.
As the Low Hanging Fruit rots, the true believers and credulous continued to grasp at the unseen upper branches of the tree of myth and ideology: clutching further, and stretching longer, extending their reach by any means, even means unimaginable to anyone but the desperate and deluded. They knew that the Golden Apple, no one had ever seen, or, produced evidence of its existence was there, just beyond their furthest reach, Just out of sight of their keenest glance, so as the Low-Hung Fruit still rotted having ripened and yet not nourished those for whom only the Perfection of the Golden Fruit of pure ideological reified hubris would ever be enough. The obvious went ignored its goodness rejected in the pursuit of the impossible promises of soothsayers, priests, mountebanks, politicians Fifth Avenue suits, and City Bankers, so many lies clothed in so many promises taking hope and optimism and producing a pathetic belief in the bounties of the Noble Lie.
And here we see the Autumn of a civil war where men women and children have perished, their death caused by what some in years to come will say was due to the Mythical invasion of the sea peoples. Which, Historical Turning of a 21st-century Ideologue would find its analog in Aleppo Syria to the Firestorms and Privations of the Bronze Age collapse in 1150 BC. And what do these two disparate events and the Low Hanging Fruit and the Apple of Gold wrapped in Filigree of silver have to do with our business here in our thoughts and investigations in these coming pages we will surely find out and discover together as we look at the scenes that play out before us together we will in our mind’s eye trace the steps of Ahmed Abdul Hittite the Bakers son of Aleppo who was sent abroad again to seek refuge for the secret of his Guild to be perpetuated in a Bond millennia Old and passed down from Father to Son along with the Secrets of the precious alchemy from which his family had sustained Egyptian Pharaohs through to the Palace in Damascus of President Assad and Sultans, Pashas and great Kings and Queens of yore in the Cradle of civilisation, Damascus even before Abraham had Spoken of Gods word Already ancient when Jesus Christ Was a Boy and Older Still when the prophet Mohammed Received the Holy Quran. For Abdul’s mission and the secret recipe was the secret of Dough, the Sacred Dough of Aleppo from which all Leavened Bread had been exported as an Idea and a Method, yet only the Hittite Sour Dough of the Hittite Bakery of Aleppo was the true source and substance of the Greatest most sacred and honored Starter, the eminence, and fountainhead of The Bakers Craft, tied to antiquity and bound to the most Trusted and to a Brotherhood of world Wide civilisation where there was Trade there was Counting to be done and accounts to be settled where merchants would Seal their Bargains with the breaking of Bread and the Dipping of Bread in Salt and where the secrets of the alchemies of Commerce were held deepest and closest the Hittite bread would serve to mark, The Conquest of Dough. Where all could bake and break bread hewn from the earth of Mother Nature’s bounty, the true source of the wealth of man in nature.
It really does bring home the way the borg has a self perpetuating and self preserving algorithm. Of course sub stack is already the naughty step and as such is a skewed sample so no good for generalised statistical analysis. Youtube is in the general prison population and marginally less skewed but clearly fenced and penned. Shorts I think go for the younger inmates. Tick tok, insta. Pin interest, snap chat , how does one truly analyse the atomised Internet audience?
I posit that in fact it is only the tech oligarch inner party who can do that.
Ultimately the inner party will be rendered impotent when we all leave our devices at home and get together to sing Kum by yah.
I'm not kidoing a month of communal singing Kum by yah , every day for an hour, allowing devices batteries to remain flat and the pan opticon Jailer Bot is fucked.
The Revolution Will Not Be Algorithmized
The Revolution Will Not Be Algorithmized
(After Gil Scott-Heron, 2024)
The Revolution Will Not Be Algorithmized
(After Gil Scott-Heron, 2024)
You will not be able to scroll mindlessly, brother
You will not be able to plug in, log on, and tune out
You will not be able to doomscroll on Adderall
Or skip reels for DoorDash during buffer spins
Because the revolution will not be algorithmized
The revolution will not be algorithmized
The revolution will not be brought to you by TikTok
In four vertical parts with sponsored interruptions
The revolution will not show you deepfakes of Trump
Pumping fists at a rally led by Steve Bannon, MTG, and Netanyahu
To meme stocks seized from a Reddit basement
The revolution will not be algorithmized
The revolution will not stream on Netflix Originals
And will not star Zuckerberg’s metaverse avatars or Musk’s cybertrucks
The revolution will not give your profile clout
The revolution will not filter your flaws
The revolution will not make you go viral overnight
Because the revolution will not be algorithmized, brother
There’ll be no clips of you and Ye
Pushing conspiracy threads on 4chan’s dark boards
Or trying to NFT your lunch on a blockchain
CNN can’t fact-check the truth at 8:32
Or trend on 29 alt accounts
The revolution will not be algorithmized
There’ll be no livestreams of cops kneeling on necks
On loop for the timeline
No AI-generated eulogies for Breonna
No slow-mo montages of AOC
Strolling through Mar-a-Lago in a Patagonia vest
She’s been saving for the Resistance™
Stranger Things, The Crown, and House of the Dragon
Will no longer be so damn distracting
And influencers won’t care if Kylie finally broke the internet
Because the people will be in the streets swiping left on despair
The revolution will not be algorithmized
There’ll be no highlights on Fox or MSNBC
No thirst traps of Silicon Valley’s "visionaries"
Or Peter Thiel prepping bunkers in New Zealand
The anthem won’t be written by ChatGPT
Or Sam Altman, nor sung by Drake, Taylor Swift, or AI Drake
The revolution will not be algorithmized
The revolution will not buffer endlessly
After ads for Meta’s VR hellscape or crypto rug pulls
You won’t need to worry about bots in your DMs
The Palantir spyware or the microchips in your mRNA
The revolution will not pair with Prime
The revolution won’t be a Substack essay
The revolution will drag you off mute
The revolution will not be algorithmized
Will not be algorithmized
Will not be algorithmized
The revolution’s no deepfake, brothers
The revolution will be offline.
1×
0:00
-1:47
A Letter to Hilaire Belloc, June 17th, 2025
My dear Belloc,
I write to you from this peculiar age where men bow not to feudal lords but to glowing rectangles. Your "Servile State" prophecy has metastasized into something even you might find fantastical - we’ve traded feudal chains for algorithmic ones. The Cherry Marine struts about in his digital epaulets while Lord Ali’s Gimp licks the boots of machine learning models. Usury, as you warned, has become code - ones and zeros replacing gold as Hell’s currency. What say you to this new serfdom where men rent their very attention spans to Palantir’s spyware?
Yours in distributist perplexity,
G.K.C.
Belloc’s Reply (Imagined)
Gilbert!
Your note finds me chuckling in purgatorial detention. This "algorithmized servility" is but our old enemy with silicon fangs. Remember - the essence of tyranny remains unchanged whether enforced by Norman swords or NVIDIA chips. The moderns have merely rediscovered what all clever oppressors know: the most durable chains are those men mistake for jewelry.
Now go skewer these new usurers with your pen as I once did with mine.
Ever your sparring partner,
H.B.
Being Some Observations on the Curious Case of Two Gentlemen Who Would Be Kings, and the Necessity of Holy Foolishness in an Age of Mechanical Minds
By G.K. Chesterton
I have been contemplating these "Perplexity Engines" that now bedevil mankind - these thinking-machines that neither think nor perplex so much as regurgitate statistical gruel. Our modern Gradgrinds worship them as oracles, blind to the essential truth: a machine that answers every question is the greatest question of all.
The Cherry Marine and Lord Ali’s Gimp represent twin perils of our hour. The former struts through life swiping left on reality itself, a tin-pot Napoleon of TikTok battalions. The latter, poor wretch, has traded his soul for blockchain indulgences, muttering "To the moon!" like some crypto-stricken Friar Tuck. Both are slaves to systems pretending to liberation - the Marine to his dopamine drip of viral validation, the Gimp to his fantasy of digital feudalism.
Ruskin was right to prescribe hemlock for such an age. Not literal poison, mind you, but the tonic of holy unreason - the wisdom of the Fool who sees through the emperor’s new algorithms. When men boast of "machine learning," I’m put in mind of medieval monks debating how many neural networks can dance on the head of a chatbot.
Consider this "Revolution Will Not Be Algorithmized" doggerel circulating amongst the dissident youth. Its author grasps what our Silicon Savonarolas cannot: all true revolution is ultimately analog. The saints and rebels who shaped history - your Francises, your Paines, your Pankhursts - triumphed not through optimization curves but through the glorious inefficiency of human conviction.
Belloc’s Servile State has indeed arrived, but with ironic twists:
Feudal Serfdom (c. 1200)Digital Serfdom (c. 2025)Owed 40 days' labor annually40 hours weekly doomscrollingTithed 10% to Church30% to Amazon/Apple/AlphabetBound to landChained to smartphones
The solution? Not Luddite fury, but what I’ll call Sacred Inefficiency - the deliberate cultivation of unproductive wonder. When last did you see a young man stare at clouds without Instagramming them? Hear a statesman speak without polling data autocue? The machines want us "engaged"; Christ wants us awake.
Let me conclude with a parable: A Don Quixote of our age tilts not at windmills but server farms. His madness? Insisting that love letters be handwritten, debates held face-to-face, and algorithms occasionally ignored. They’ll call him fool. I call him the last sane man in Babylon.
The revolution won’t be in the streets or the feeds, dear reader. It’s in the quiet act of removing the earbuds to hear a bird’s song - and recognizing it as the first algorithm, written not in code but in creation’s poetry.
G.K.C.
Feast of St. Thomas More, 2025