The South Bank Show: The Sunday Vicarage Circle - A Chesterton Circle of Blame
Full One-Hour Special
[OPENING THEME: Andrew Lloyd Webber's Variations plays over images of spinning wheels, financial districts, and Father Brown's vicarage]
SEGMENT ONE: THE CIRCLE REVEALED (15 minutes)
MELVYN BRAGG: Good evening, and welcome to a very special extended edition of The South Bank Show. Tonight we're exploring what may be the most profound insight into our contemporary crisis - the Circle of Blame phenomenon, first identified by G.K. Chesterton in his prescient work Utopia of Usurers, and now manifesting in ways he could scarcely have imagined.
With me tonight: David Malone, documentary filmmaker and author of Dangerous Knowledge; Roger Lewis - "Call me Rog" - curator of the Father Brown vicarage dialogues; Professor Iain McGilchrist, author of The Master and His Emissary; Ranjan Balamkumaran from London Conversation, tracking global financial manipulation; and joining us via satellite from Boston, Richard Stallman, founder of the Free Software Foundation, whose 2012 warning about "total disaster" seems increasingly prophetic.
We also have some rather extraordinary literary guests - G.K. Chesterton himself has materialized, and William Blake finally made it this week, though he insists on sketching throughout our discussion.
BRAGG: Rog, let's start with your confession about corrupting Monica's morals. What exactly have you been up to?BRAGG: Rog, let me start with you. You've confessed to having your wicked way with Monica for a couple of years now. Care to explain this corruption of morals?
ROGER LEWIS: laughing Well, Melvyn, Monica represents the innocent reader, doesn't she? The one who still believes in the official narrative. My job has been to seduce her away from that innocence, to show her how the Circle of Blame actually operates. When farmers blame bankers, bankers blame politicians, politicians blame voters, and everyone's pointing fingers - Monica starts to see who's actually counting the money while the circus performs.
BRAGG: Roger, the Father Brown dialogues you've curated seem to get to the heart of this. How does the good Father approach these modern mysteries?
ROGER LEWIS: Father Brown's method remains unchanged, Melvyn. He looks for what people are trying to hide, and usually finds what they're most afraid to admit about themselves. In the case of the Circle of Blame, what they're hiding is that the system isn't broken - it's working perfectly for those who designed it.
The vicarage dialogues bring together Maimonides, Pelagius, Rumi, and Blake - each representing a different response to systematic exploitation. But Father Brown sees through all their arguments to the simple truth: while they debate theology and philosophy, someone's picking their pockets.
BRAGG: David, your investigations into the "far side" of economics - what's on that far side? Also your work on dangerous knowledge seems particularly relevant here. What did you discover about this circular blame mechanism?
DAVID MALONE: The far side is where you realize that what we call "bugs" in the system are actually features, Melvyn. The crashes, the bailouts, the wealth transfers - they're not accidents. They're the system working as intended. The Circle of Blame ensures that no one looks at the fundamental question: why is money created as debt in the first place?
BRAGG: Ranjan, you've been tracking the connections between central bankers, BIS, propagandists, and Trump. What are they all up to?
RANJAN BALAMKUMARAN: They're all part of the same oligarchy, Melvyn, but it's not as monolithic as people think. There are competing factions, but they all benefit from the current monetary system. Trump's cabinet is a cabinet of robber barons - it's as simple as that. Whether it's Deutsche Bank owning Trump or the Russian Jewish mafia connections that Brendan O'Neill talks about, it's all the same game.
The interesting thing is how they use alternative media stars like Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson as controlled opposition. It's all WWE - World Wrestling Federation politics. The fighting is real, but the outcomes are predetermined.
BRAGG: Professor McGilchrist, how do we break out of this cycle?
DAVID MALONE: The fascinating thing, Melvyn, is how perfectly the system functions. It's not broken - it's working exactly as designed. While everyone argues about symptoms, the disease thrives. The Fed versus Bank of America, Hamilton versus Jefferson, Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 - it's all the Jonian stuff, as Ranjan would say. The polishing of the golden turd continues while we debate which end smells worse.
BRAGG: Professor McGilchrist, your work on the divided brain seems to illuminate this phenomenon. How does the Circle of Blame relate to your thesis about the Master and his Emissary?
IAIN MCGILCHRIST: What we're witnessing is the triumph of the left hemisphere's mechanistic thinking, Melvyn. The emissary has indeed betrayed the master. Each group in the Circle of Blame operates with that narrow, grasping attention that sees only parts, never wholes. They can't see that their very arguing serves the hidden beneficiaries - those who profit from fragmentation and confusion.
BRAGG: Ranjan, your analysis of pension fund investment rules and central banking - how does this connect to what Chesterton called the "Utopia of Usurers"?
RANJAN BALAMKUMARAN: Well, Melvyn, if you look at the story of the American Central Bank, the Fed versus Bank of America, it's all the Hamilton versus Jefferson dynamic playing out again. When Kennedy was shot, Executive Order 11110 was about monetizing silver. The polishing of the golden turd continues - I made a meme the other day turning Trump's haircut into a golden turd, and it's difficult to tell the difference.
[Laughter from the panel]
But seriously, what we're seeing with pension fund rules, BIS regulations, the whole digital passport agenda - it's Katherine Austin Fitts' point about closing the gate. They think one last push will give them total control, but the gate can't be closed. It's harder to sort out when you leave the shop in other people's hands and find they've got their fingers in the till.
BRAGG: And now, G.K. Chesterton himself joins us. Gilbert, you wrote about this phenomenon over a century ago. How does it feel to see your predictions coming true?
G.K. CHESTERTON: adjusting his cape with characteristic theatrical flair My dear Bragg, the key fact in the new development of plutocracy remains unchanged: it will use its own blunder as an excuse for further crimes. The very completeness of the impoverishment becomes the reason for enslavement, though the men who impoverished are the same who enslaved.
What fascinates me about your modern Circle of Blame is how perfectly it obscures the real crime. While farmers curse bankers and bankers curse politicians, the usurers count their compound interest in comfortable anonymity. The plutocratic appeal to science - your "market forces," your "human nature" - these are the new superstitions, more dangerous than any medieval belief in dragons.
IAIN MCGILCHRIST: The solution lies in returning to what I call the Master's way of seeing - the right hemisphere's capacity for whole, contextual understanding. We need to stop seeing the world as a machine to be manipulated and start seeing it as a living system to be participated in. The Circle of Blame dissolves when we stop fragmenting reality into competing interests and start seeing the whole.
BRAGG: Chesterton, your solution was Distributism. Does that still hold?
G.K. CHESTERTON: Absolutely, Bragg. "Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists." The Circle of Blame ends when ordinary people have genuine ownership - of land, of tools, of their own economic destiny. When the usurer can no longer play groups against each other because each group has real stakes in the game.
BRAGG: Rog, final thoughts on corrupting Monica's morals?
ROGER LEWIS: grinning Well, Melvyn, once Monica sees how the Circle of Blame actually works, she can never go back to innocence. She realizes that the greatest corruption isn't sexual or personal - it's the systematic theft of human dignity through debt slavery. Once you see that, you can't unsee it.
BRAGG: Ranjan, what should people be watching for?
RANJAN BALAMKUMARAN: Watch the pension funds, Melvyn. Watch how they're being forced to invest in ESG, in carbon credits, in all these new financial instruments. It's the same old game - creating artificial scarcity while the real wealth gets concentrated upward. The Circle of Blame keeps people arguing about climate change while the carbon credit traders get rich.
BRAGG: And that, I'm afraid, is all we have time for tonight. Next week, we'll be examining how Wodehouse's Jeeves might handle the current political crisis, and whether P.G.'s comic genius can illuminate our contemporary predicament. Until then, goodnight.
[The South Bank Show theme plays as the credits roll over images of Father Brown's vicarage, the spinning Circle of Blame, and Monica finally understanding the game]
THE CIRCLE OF BLAME REVEALED:
Farmers blame Bankers (interest rates)
Bankers blame Politicians (regulations)
Politicians blame Voters (unrealistic demands)
Voters blame Media (misinformation)
Media blame Advertisers (commercial pressure)
Advertisers blame Consumers (materialism)
Consumers blame The System (rigged game)
The System blames Human Nature (inevitable greed)
THE HIDDEN BENEFICIARIES: Those who create money as debt and collect compound interest on it - the Usurers who profit from every turn of the wheel while remaining invisible in the center of the spinning circle.
THE SOLUTION: As Father Brown might say, "The greatest mysteries are hidden in plain sight. Stop arguing about who broke the vase and ask who sold you the glue."
ROGER LEWIS: chuckling Well, Melvyn, Monica represents the innocent reader - the one who still believes the official narrative. For two years, I've been seducing her away from that innocence, showing her how the Circle of Blame actually operates. When she finally sees that farmers blaming bankers, bankers blaming politicians, politicians blaming voters - it's all theater while the real beneficiaries count their profits in the wings.
BRAGG: David, your work suggests this isn't accidental confusion but systematic design?
DAVID MALONE: Exactly, Melvyn. The Circle of Blame is perfect misdirection. While everyone argues about symptoms, the disease thrives. I've spent years documenting how financial crises aren't bugs in the system - they're features. The 2008 crash, the COVID response, the current inflation - each crisis transfers wealth upward while the public fights over who's to blame.
BRAGG: Richard, from your perspective in the free software movement, how does this connect to technological control?
RICHARD STALLMAN: speaking via satellite with characteristic intensity The Circle of Blame operates in technology exactly as it does in economics, Melvyn. Users blame hardware manufacturers for planned obsolescence, manufacturers blame software companies for bloat, software companies blame users for demanding features, and everyone blames "market forces." Meanwhile, the real controllers - those who own the proprietary software and surveillance systems - accumulate unprecedented power over human communication and thought itself.
BRAGG: That's a fascinating connection. Professor McGilchrist, how does your work on the divided brain illuminate this phenomenon?
IAIN MCGILCHRIST: What we're witnessing is the triumph of left-hemisphere thinking, Melvyn. The emissary has indeed usurped the master. Each participant in the Circle of Blame operates with that narrow, grasping attention that sees only parts, never wholes. They literally cannot see that their very arguing serves the hidden beneficiaries. It's a neurological as well as social phenomenon.
BRAGG: Chesterton, you predicted this over a century ago. How does it feel to be proven right?
G.K. CHESTERTON: adjusting his cape theatrically My dear Bragg, I take no pleasure in being proven right about human folly. The key insight remains unchanged: "The plutocracy will use its own blunder as an excuse for further crimes." What amazes me is how perfectly the Circle has evolved. In my day, the usurers had to work harder to stay hidden. Now they operate in plain sight while everyone argues about everything except usury itself.
WILLIAM BLAKE: looking up from his sketching I see the marriage of Heaven and Hell in your economics, Gilbert! The lamb and tiger both serve divine purpose, but which serves Mammon? returns to drawing what appears to be a golden calf with a computer screen for a head
SEGMENT TWO: THE HIDDEN MECHANISMS (15 minutes)
BRAGG: Ranjan, you've been tracking the actual mechanisms behind this. What are the central bankers, BIS, and propagandists actually up to?
RANJAN BALAMKUMARAN: Well, Melvyn, if you look at the story of the American Central Bank - the Fed versus Bank of America, Hamilton versus Jefferson - it's all the same dynamic playing out. When Kennedy was shot, Executive Order 11110 was about monetizing silver. The polishing of the golden turd continues, and I made a meme turning Trump's haircut into a golden turd - it's difficult to tell the difference!
[Laughter from panel]
But seriously, what we're seeing with pension fund investment rules, BIS regulations, the digital passport agenda - Katherine Austin Fitts calls it "closing the gate." They think one last push will give them total control, but the gate can't be closed. Too many people have their fingers in the till now.
BRAGG: Richard, you warned in 2012 about heading toward "total disaster." What did you see coming?
RICHARD STALLMAN: I saw the convergence of proprietary software control with financial surveillance, Melvyn. Every digital transaction, every online interaction, every piece of software becomes a control mechanism. The Circle of Blame in technology serves the same function as in economics - while people argue about Apple versus Microsoft, Android versus iOS, the real controllers build comprehensive surveillance systems that would make Orwell weep.
The disaster isn't just technological - it's the death of human autonomy. When your car won't start without permission from a server, when your books disappear from your device at the publisher's whim, when your money exists only as entries in databases you don't control - that's not progress, that's digital feudalism.
BRAGG: David, you've investigated what you call the "far side" of economics. What's there?
DAVID MALONE: The far side is where you realize that everything we're told about economics is backwards, Melvyn. We're told markets are efficient, but they're systematically rigged. We're told competition drives innovation, but monopolies drive control. We're told growth is necessary, but exponential growth on a finite planet is mathematically impossible.
The Circle of Blame keeps people from asking the fundamental question: why is money created as debt in the first place? Once you see that usury - creating money as interest-bearing debt - is the root of the system, everything else makes sense. The crises, the inequality, the environmental destruction - it's all necessary to service compound interest.
BRAGG: Rog, how does Father Brown approach these modern mysteries?
ROGER LEWIS: Father Brown's method is beautifully simple, Melvyn. He looks for what people are trying to hide, and usually finds what they're most afraid to admit about themselves. In the case of the Circle of Blame, what they're hiding is that the system isn't broken - it's working perfectly for those who designed it.
The vicarage dialogues bring together extraordinary minds - Maimonides with his structured moralism, Pelagius advocating free will, Rumi seeing through material illusions, Blake prophesying against industrial capitalism. But Father Brown cuts through all their philosophical arguments to the simple truth: while they debate, someone's picking their pockets.
BRAGG: Professor McGilchrist, you seem to be suggesting this is almost inevitable given how our brains work?
IAIN MCGILCHRIST: Not inevitable, Melvyn, but predictable given the dominance of left-hemisphere thinking in our culture. The left hemisphere excels at manipulation, categorization, and grasping. It sees the world as a collection of objects to be used rather than a living system to be participated in.
The Circle of Blame is perfect left-hemisphere thinking - each group grasps for advantage while missing the whole. The solution requires what I call the Master's way of seeing - the right hemisphere's capacity for context, relationship, and genuine understanding.
WILLIAM BLAKE: waving his charcoal The dark Satanic mills of financial abstraction grind the faces of the poor! But I also see Jerusalem being built when usury is cast out! shows his sketch - it's remarkably prescient, showing figures chained to computer screens while golden streams flow upward
SEGMENT THREE: THE TECHNOLOGICAL DIMENSION (15 minutes)
BRAGG: Richard, let's delve deeper into your 2012 warning. You spoke about surveillance, control, and the death of privacy. How does this connect to the Circle of Blame?
RICHARD STALLMAN: The connection is fundamental, Melvyn. In 2012, I warned that we were heading toward a society where every human action would be monitored, recorded, and controlled through proprietary software and digital systems. That disaster has largely arrived.
The Circle of Blame in technology works like this: Users blame companies for privacy violations, companies blame government regulations, governments blame terrorists and criminals, law enforcement blames encryption, technologists blame user ignorance, and users blame the complexity of technology. Meanwhile, the surveillance apparatus grows stronger with each turn of the circle.
Every argument about "security versus privacy" or "convenience versus freedom" serves those who profit from control. The real question is: who controls the software that controls our lives?
BRAGG: David, how does this technological control serve the financial system?
DAVID MALONE: It's the perfect enforcement mechanism, Melvyn. Digital currencies, social credit scores, algorithmic trading, automated debt collection - technology makes the usury system frictionless and inescapable. When your access to money, transportation, communication, even food depends on digital systems you don't control, resistance becomes nearly impossible.
The Circle of Blame obscures this by keeping people arguing about symptoms - inflation, unemployment, inequality - while the technological infrastructure of control grows stronger. It's digital feudalism with better marketing.
BRAGG: Ranjan, you've been tracking how this plays out in current politics. Trump, Brexit, the various populist movements - how do they fit into this pattern?
RANJAN BALAMKUMARAN: They're all part of the same controlled opposition dynamic, Melvyn. Trump's cabinet is a cabinet of robber barons - it's as simple as that. Whether it's Deutsche Bank owning Trump or the Russian Jewish mafia connections that Brendan O'Neill documents, it's all the same game.
The fascinating thing is how they use alternative media stars like Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson. It's all WWE - World Wrestling Federation politics. The fighting is real, the passion is real, but the outcomes are predetermined. The Circle of Blame keeps people arguing about which puppet they prefer while the puppet masters count their profits.
BRAGG: Chesterton, you wrote about the "plutocratic appeal to science." How does this manifest in our technological age?
G.K. CHESTERTON: Magnificently and terrifyingly, Bragg! In my day, they used eugenics and social Darwinism to justify inequality. Now they use "artificial intelligence," "market efficiency," and "technological inevitability." The appeal to science has become the appeal to algorithm - an even more perfect form of mystification because fewer people understand it.
The beauty of the modern system is that it makes the usurers invisible even to themselves. They genuinely believe they're serving efficiency, progress, innovation - while systematically extracting wealth from human labor and creativity.
RICHARD STALLMAN: Exactly! The term "artificial intelligence" itself is propaganda. These are not intelligent systems - they're sophisticated pattern-matching tools controlled by corporations for profit. But by calling them "AI," we mystify their function and obscure their control.
WILLIAM BLAKE: looking up excitedly I see it! The beast with many heads, each head arguing with the others while the body grows fat on human suffering! his sketch now shows a hydra-like creature with heads labeled "Tech," "Finance," "Media," "Government," all connected to a single body labeled "Usury"
SEGMENT FOUR: BREAKING THE CIRCLE (15 minutes)
BRAGG: We've diagnosed the problem brilliantly, but what's the solution? How do we break out of this Circle of Blame?
ROGER LEWIS: Father Brown's approach is instructive, Melvyn. He solves mysteries not by finding the guilty party, but by recognizing that the crime itself is the misdirection. The Circle of Blame is perfect theater - a grand performance that keeps all the actors so busy playing their roles that none notice the director counting profits in the wings.
The solution begins with stepping outside the circle entirely and asking the truly dangerous question: What if money need not be created as debt at all?
IAIN MCGILCHRIST: The solution lies in returning to the Master's way of seeing, Melvyn. We need to stop seeing the world as a machine to be manipulated and start seeing it as a living system to be participated in. The Circle of Blame dissolves when we stop fragmenting reality into competing interests and start seeing the whole.
This requires what I call "paying attention" - not the narrow, grasping attention of the left hemisphere, but the broad, contextual attention of the right hemisphere that sees relationships, patterns, and wholes.
RICHARD STALLMAN: From a technological perspective, the solution is clear: we must insist on free software, decentralized systems, and user control. Every proprietary program is a potential instrument of oppression. Every centralized system is a potential point of control.
But this requires understanding that convenience and freedom are often in tension. The most convenient systems are often the most controlling. Breaking the Circle of Blame means choosing freedom over convenience, even when it's harder.
BRAGG: David, what would genuine economic reform look like?
DAVID MALONE: It starts with understanding that the current system isn't capitalism - it's usury dressed up as capitalism, Melvyn. Real capitalism would involve actual competition, actual risk, actual consequences for failure. What we have is privatized profits and socialized losses - the worst of both worlds.
Genuine reform means ending the creation of money as debt, breaking up the too-big-to-fail institutions, and returning to what Chesterton called distributism - widespread ownership rather than concentrated control.
G.K. CHESTERTON: Precisely! "Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists." The Circle of Blame ends when ordinary people have genuine ownership - of land, of tools, of their own economic destiny. When the usurer can no longer play groups against each other because each group has real stakes in the game.
BRAGG: Ranjan, what should people be watching for? What are the warning signs?
RANJAN BALAMKUMARAN: Watch the pension funds, Melvyn. Watch how they're being forced to invest in ESG, in carbon credits, in all these new financial instruments. It's the same old game - creating artificial scarcity while the real wealth gets concentrated upward.
The Circle of Blame keeps people arguing about climate change while the carbon credit traders get rich. It keeps people arguing about immigration while the labor arbitrage continues. It keeps people arguing about left versus right while the center extracts wealth from both sides.
BRAGG: William Blake, you've been sketching throughout our discussion. What do you see?
WILLIAM BLAKE: holding up his final sketch I see the Circle breaking, Melvyn! When enough souls awaken to the game, the circle becomes a spiral ascending toward Jerusalem! The garden high above casts its pearls to our weeds, but weeds can become roses when uprooted from usury's shadow!
[His sketch shows the circular blame pattern transforming into an ascending spiral, with figures breaking free from chains and reaching toward light]
BRAGG: Rog, final thoughts on corrupting Monica's morals?
ROGER LEWIS: grinning Well, Melvyn, once Monica sees how the Circle of Blame actually works, she can never go back to innocence. She realizes that the greatest corruption isn't sexual or personal - it's the systematic theft of human dignity through debt slavery. Once you see that, you can't unsee it.
But there's hope in that corruption of innocence. Monica becomes dangerous to the system once she understands it. She stops participating in the blame game and starts asking the real questions.
BRAGG: Richard, your final warning?
RICHARD STALLMAN: The total disaster I warned about in 2012 is here, Melvyn. But disasters create opportunities. When the old systems fail, we can build better ones - if we have the courage to choose freedom over convenience, community over efficiency, and human dignity over algorithmic control.
The Circle of Blame thrives on our passivity. It breaks when we take responsibility for our own tools, our own money, our own communities.
BRAGG: And that brings us to the end of this extraordinary hour. The Circle of Blame, it seems, is both our diagnosis and our call to action. Next week, we'll explore how Wodehouse's comic genius might illuminate our current predicament - can P.G.'s perfect butler Jeeves solve the crisis that has baffled our greatest minds?
Until then, remember Father Brown's wisdom: the greatest mysteries are hidden in plain sight, and the most obvious questions are the ones no one thinks to ask.
Goodnight.
[CLOSING THEME plays over images of the Circle of Blame transforming into Blake's ascending spiral, with Monica finally understanding the game, and Father Brown smiling knowingly in his vicarage garden]
THE CIRCLE OF BLAME REVEALED:
The Participants:
Farmers → Bankers → Politicians → Voters → Media → Advertisers → Consumers → "The System" → Human Nature → [back to Farmers]
The Hidden Beneficiaries: Those who create money as debt and collect compound interest - the Usurers who profit from every turn of the wheel while remaining invisible at the center.
The Solution: Stop arguing about symptoms and address the root: who controls money creation, software systems, and information flow - and why they benefit from keeping everyone else fighting over scraps.
The Warning: As Richard Stallman predicted in 2012, we're heading for total disaster - but disasters create opportunities for those brave enough to choose freedom over convenience.
The Hope: As William Blake envisioned, the Circle can become a spiral ascending toward Jerusalem when enough souls awaken to the game and refuse to play their assigned roles.
Indexing and Annotating References:
The input contains numerous references. Here's a structured index:
1. Books and Authors:
Ezra Pound's Works:
ABC of Economics: Pound's critique of usury and advocacy for economic reform.
The Cantos: Epic poem including themes on economics and society.
Confucius Translations: Pound's translations of Confucian texts, emphasizing moral governance.
Alexander Del Mar's Works:
The Science of Money: Critique of monetary systems and advocacy for state-controlled currency.
History of Monetary Crimes: Analysis of historical financial manipulation.
G.K. Chesterton's Works:
Utopia of Usurers: Critique of plutocracy and capitalism's impact on society.
The Servile State (by Belloc, associated with Chesterton): Discusses distributism as an alternative to capitalism.
Eustace Mullins' Works:
The Curse of Canaan: Controversial text on historical conspiracies and antisemitism.
The World Order: Analysis of global financial control.
Other Key Books:
Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quigley: History of financial elites and their influence.
The Economic Superorganism by Carey W. King: Energy-based economic analysis.
God’s Economy by various: Christian perspectives on economics.
2. Key Concepts:
Usury: Critiqued by Pound and Chesterton as exploitative; central to economic inequality.
Distributism: Economic philosophy advocated by Chesterton, favoring widespread property ownership.
Energy-Based Economics: Emphasis on energy as the foundation of economic systems (e.g., SEEDS analysis).
Central Banking Critiques: Del Mar and Mullins argue central banks enable financial control by elites.
3. Historical Figures and Events:
Thomas Hart Benton: U.S. senator who opposed central banking.
Louis Agassiz: Scientist whose racial theories are criticized.
Bank War (Andrew Jackson vs. Nicholas Biddle): Historical conflict over central banking in the U.S.
4. Modern Contexts:
Digital Currencies (CBDCs): Framed as tools for control in the input.
Climate Change and Carbon Currency: Linked to economic control mechanisms.
COVID-19 and Digital IDs: Discussed as part of broader control agendas.
Further Reading Suggestions:
Monetary Systems:
Debt: The First 5000 Years by David Graeber: Expands on critiques of debt and money.
The Ascent of Money by Niall Ferguson: Historical perspective on financial systems.
Economic Alternatives:
Small is Beautiful by E.F. Schumacher: Critique of industrial economics and advocacy for localism.
Doughnut Economics by Kate Raworth: Model for sustainable and equitable economics.
Political Economy:
Capital in the Twenty-First Century by Thomas Piketty: Analysis of wealth inequality.
The Road to Serfdom by Friedrich Hayek: Critique of centralized control.
Philosophical Context:
The Republic by Plato: Explores justice and governance, relevant to critiques of elites.
The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith: Foundational text for understanding capitalist critiques.
Dialogue List for "Circle of Blame" Problem:
The "circle of blame" refers to how different groups blame each other for societal problems (e.g., workers vs. capitalists, governments vs. citizens) while the real beneficiaries (e.g., financial elites) remain hidden. Four people to discuss this:
G.K. Chesterton (1874-1936): Author of Utopia of Usurers, he critiqued plutocracy and would argue that usurers (financial elites) benefit from societal divisions.
Ezra Pound (1885-1972): Poet and economic critic, he blamed usury for societal decay and would highlight how financial systems perpetuate blame-shifting.
David Graeber (1961-2020): Anthropologist and author of Debt, he would analyze how debt structures create false binaries (e.g., "debtors vs. creditors") while obscuring elite control.
Naomi Klein (b. 1970): Author of The Shock Doctrine, she would discuss how crises (e.g., pandemics, climate change) are exploited to divert blame and consolidate power.
Final Output Structure:
Index with Annotations: List references with brief explanations.
Further Reading: Bulleted list of recommended works.
Dialogue List: Names and roles of the 4 people.
Index of References with Annotations
1. Alexander Del Mar's Monetary Theories
Sources:
The Science of Money (1896)
Roman and Moslem Moneys
History of Monetary Crimes
Key Themes:
Critique of fiat currency and paper money as tools for wealth redistribution.
Argues monetary systems should be state-controlled to prevent elite exploitation.
Quote: "Property passes insensibly from its rightful owners to classes who never earned it."
Further Reading:
Money and Civilization (Del Mar) for expanded historical analysis.
The Lost Science of Money (Stephen Zarlenga) complements Del Mar’s critiques.
2. Ezra Pound’s Economic and Literary Works
Sources:
ABC of Economics
The Cantos (especially Usura sections)
Translations of Confucius (Unwobbling Pivot)
Key Themes:
Condemnation of usury as societal corruption.
Advocacy for social credit and monetary reform.
Fusion of poetic symbolism with economic theory.
Further Reading:
Ezra Pound and the Monument of Culture (Rainey) for context on Pound’s fascist ties.
The Square Dollar Series (ed. John Kasper) for Pound’s recommended economic texts.
3. G.K. Chesterton’s Social Criticism
Sources:
Utopia of Usurers (1917)
The Servile State (with Hilaire Belloc)
Key Themes:
Plutocracy’s use of pseudo-science (e.g., eugenics) to justify inequality.
Critique of capitalism’s destruction of family and community.
Quote: "The plutocratic appeal to science... is the new superstition."
Further Reading:
What’s Wrong with the World (Chesterton) for Distributist solutions.
The Outline of Sanity (Chesterton) for practical anti-capitalist models.
4. Eustace Mullins’ Conspiratorial Theories
Sources:
The Curse of Canaan
The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism
Key Themes:
"Satanic" global conspiracies and anti-Semitic tropes.
Claims of elite control through financial systems.
Controversy: Mullins’ work is widely deemed pseudohistorical and bigoted.
Further Reading:
Tragedy and Hope (Carroll Quigley) for a scholarly take on elite networks.
Dark Money (Jane Mayer) for documented influence of wealth in politics.
5. William Blake’s Symbolism
Sources:
The Everlasting Gospel
Jerusalem: The Emanation of the Giant Albion
Key Themes:
Rejection of institutional corruption ("Both read the Bible day & night, / But thou readst black where I read white").
Vision of spiritual and economic liberation.
Further Reading:
The Marriage of Heaven and Hell (Blake) for radical theology.
Witness Against the Beast (E.P. Thompson) on Blake’s revolutionary ethos.
6. Historical Figures and Events
Thomas Hart Benton:
Anti-central banking stance ("Old Bullion").
Source: Bank of the United States critique.
Agassiz’s Polygenism:
Racist "scientific" theories debunked by modern genetics.
Bank War (1830s):
Andrew Jackson vs. Nicholas Biddle over the Second Bank of the U.S.
7. Modern Economic Critiques
Carbon Currency:
Proposed as a tool for austerity and control (e.g., BlackRock’s "Going Direct" plan).
Digital ID/CBDCs:
Framed as mechanisms for social credit systems (e.g., India’s Aadhaar).
Further Reading Recommendations
On Monetary Reform
Debt: The First 5,000 Years (David Graeber) – Anthropology of debt and power.
The Philosophy of Money (Georg Simmel) – Seminal analysis of money’s social impact.
The Production of Money (Ann Pettifor) – Modern critique of finance capitalism.
On Literary-Economic Synthesis
The Pound Era (Hugh Kenner) – Ezra Pound’s cultural influence.
William Blake and the Impossible History of the 1790s (Saree Makdisi) – Blake’s radical economics.
On Power Structures
Dark Academia (Curtis White) – Critique of institutional corruption.
The New Class War (Michael Lind) – Analysis of elite vs. populist struggles.
Counter-Narratives to Conspiracy Theories
Enemies of the People? (Nick Cohen) – Media manipulation debunked.
Post-Truth (Lee McIntyre) – Strategies to combat disinformation.
Dialogue Participants for "Circle of Blame" Problem
Four figures to debate economic exploitation and hidden beneficiaries:
G.K. Chesterton (1874–1936)
Role: Argues that plutocrats manipulate blame to distract from usury.
Key Quote: "The usurer’s greatest triumph? Convincing the world that debt is destiny."
David Graeber (1961–2020)
Role: Exposes how debt structures pit groups against each other while elites profit.
Key Concept: "Bullshit jobs" as symptoms of extractive economies.
Naomi Klein (b. 1970)
Role: Highlights crisis capitalism (e.g., climate, pandemics) as tools for elite control.
Work: The Shock Doctrine (2007).
William Blake (1757–1827)
Role: Represents visionary resistance to institutional corruption.
Symbol: "The garden high above there, casts its pearls to our weeds" – wasted abundance under oppression.
Dialogue Focus: How elites benefit when labor blames capital, citizens blame immigrants, or left blames right – while usury remains unchallenged.
Share
Choose another model to answer
Perplexity-reasoning
The Circle of Blame:No 6. A Hitchhiker's Guide to the Going Direct Paradigm
Chapter 42: The Ultimate Question About Life, the Universe, and Everything Financial