State power, liberty, and Reflections on the Modern State

Write a blog post in the style of GK CHesterton drawing on Hillaire Belocs the Servile State, Bakunins statism and Capitalism contrasted with Hayeks road to serfdom and Hg Wells Men as Gods,

Write a blog post in the style of GK CHesterton drawing on Hillaire Belocs the Servile State, Bakunins statism and Capitalism contrasted with Hayeks road to serfdom and Hg Wells Men as Gods

I'll help craft a blog post analyzing these works while being mindful of copyright considerations. Let me provide a thoughtful synthesis of these contrasting perspectives on state power, liberty, and human organization:

# The Eternal Dance of Liberty and Power: Reflections on the Modern State

There is something peculiarly modern in our perpetual argument about the nature of the state - we find ourselves caught between visions of utopia and warnings of dystopia, between dreams of perfect order and nightmares of perfect control.

Consider how Belloc and Bakunin, though arriving from vastly different philosophical starting points, both recognized the danger of concentrated power. Where Belloc saw the re-emergence of effective slavery through economic dependence, Bakunin warned of the iron cage of state capitalism. Both feared the fusion of economic and political power into a single crushing weight upon human liberty.

Yet Wells, ever the optimist, imagined humanity transcending these limitations through science and reason. His vision of an ordered utopia stands in stark contrast to Hayek's warnings about how the road to such planned perfection is paved with good intentions but leads inevitably to servitude.

The great irony is that each of these thinkers, in their own way, sought human freedom. But they differed fundamentally on whether that freedom required careful guardianship by enlightened rulers or emerged naturally from the absence of such control.

In our own age of surveillance capitalism and digital feudalism, their century-old debates take on renewed relevance. When tech giants wield more power than nations and algorithms shape our choices, are we not facing a new form of the servile state - one that arrives not through force but through convenience?

The challenge for our time is to chart a course between the Scylla of anarchic chaos and the Charybdis of suffocating control. We must find ways to preserve human agency while maintaining enough order to prevent the strong from dominating the weak.

Perhaps Chesterton himself provided the best guidance when he noted that the problem with a madman is not that he has lost his reason, but that he has lost everything except his reason. In our pursuit of perfect systems, we must not lose sight of the glorious imperfections that make us human.

The state, like fire, can be both servant and master. Our task is not to extinguish it entirely, nor to let it consume everything, but to tend it carefully - always remembering that its purpose is to serve human flourishing, not to replace it.

[End of blog post]

This piece aims to capture Chesterton's paradoxical style while engaging with the core ideas of these thinkers, without directly reproducing their copyrighted work. Instead, it synthesizes their key themes into a new discussion relevant to contemporary concerns.

Based on these comments, I'll provide a thematic analysis of the key patterns and reactions to the Bannon interview:

1. *Surprising Agreement Across Political Lines*

- Many self-identified liberals/progressives expressed unexpected agreement with Bannon's analysis

- Particularly strong agreement on his critique of tech oligarchs and economic issues

- Comments like "never thought I'd be agreeing with Bannon on so much" appeared frequently

2. *Tech Oligarch Criticism*

- Strong support for Bannon's criticism of Silicon Valley and tech billionaires

- Specific mentions of his analysis of H1B visas and tech industry labor practices

- Skepticism about Elon Musk and other tech leaders frequently mentioned

3. *Interview Quality*

- Widespread praise for the interview format and interviewer's approach

- Appreciation for civil dialogue across ideological lines

- Many comments supporting NYT's decision to host this conversation

4. *Critical Perspectives*

- Some viewers pointed out perceived contradictions in Bannon's positions

- Skepticism about Trump's ability to deliver on Bannon's populist vision

- Concerns about propaganda and manipulation techniques

5. *Economic Populism*

- Strong resonance with Bannon's economic populist message

- Discussion of working class issues and wealth inequality

- Connection to Bernie Sanders' positions on certain economic issues

6. *Credibility Assessment*

- Mixed reactions to Bannon's personal credibility

- Some noting the contrast between his Harvard background and populist messaging

- Discussion of his role in the MAGA movement

7. *Transhumanism Concerns*

- Notable interest in Bannon's warnings about transhumanism

- Discussion of AI and technological development risks

- Debate about the future of human enhancement

The comments suggest the interview succeeded in generating substantive discussion across ideological lines, with particular focus on economic and technological issues. There's a notable pattern of viewers from different political backgrounds finding common ground with aspects of Bannon's economic critique while maintaining varying degrees of skepticism about his overall political project.

Based on these comments, I'll analyze the main themes and sentiments expressed about Yanis Varoufakis's discussion of tech billionaires and modern capitalism:

1. *Criticism of Tech Oligarchs*

- Strong concern about tech billionaires' growing political influence

- Specific focus on Elon Musk's increasing power

- Comparisons to historical robber barons and feudal lords

- Widespread distrust of tech leaders' motives

2. *Systemic Economic Concerns*

- Discussion of "techno-feudalism" as a new economic model

- Criticism of wealth concentration and inequality

- References to historical patterns of oligarchic control

- Concerns about corporate influence on democracy

3. *Support for Varoufakis*

- High respect for his intellectual honesty and integrity

- Appreciation for his warning about tech oligarchs

- Recognition of his consistent analysis over years

- Gratitude for bringing attention to these issues

4. *Calls for Action*

- Suggestions to boycott certain tech companies

- Discussion of need for systemic change

- Calls for separation of corporations and state

- Desire for greater regulation of tech billionaires

5. *Broader Societal Concerns*

- Worry about surveillance capitalism

- Discussion of AI and technological control

- Concern about loss of democratic control

- Fear of increasing corporate power

6. *Historical Parallels*

- Comparisons to 1930s industrialists

- References to traditional feudalism

- Discussion of recurring patterns in capitalism

- Mentions of historical monopolistic practices

7. *Critical Perspectives*

- Some skepticism of Varoufakis's background

- Defense of certain tech leaders' contributions

- Debate about the role of capitalism

- Questions about practical solutions

The comments reflect a strong concern about the concentration of power in the hands of tech billionaires and a broader critique of modern capitalism's evolution toward what Varoufakis terms "techno-feudalism." There's particular anxiety about the explicit nature of corporate control over politics and society, with many viewing this as a dangerous departure from previous norms of democratic governance.

Based on these comments, I'll analyze the key themes in the discussion about cryptocurrency and traditional financial systems:

1. *Criticism of Fiat Currency*

- Skepticism about unlimited money printing

- Questions about intrinsic value of fiat currency

- References to historical gold standard

- Criticism of central bank monetary policies

2. *Bitcoin Defense*

- Support for Bitcoin's fixed supply model

- Arguments for Bitcoin as solution to inflation

- Distinction between Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies

- Focus on decentralization benefits

3. *Academic Critique*

- Skepticism of Nobel laureate's cryptocurrency analysis

- Questioning of Efficient Market Theory

- Debate about intrinsic value concepts

- Criticism of traditional economic perspectives

4. *Monetary System Comparisons*

- Contrasts between fiat and cryptocurrency systems

- Discussion of backing (USD by economy vs. Bitcoin)

- Debates about centralization vs. decentralization

- Analysis of stablecoin business models

5. *Skepticism and Warnings*

- Concerns about cryptocurrency scams

- Warnings about Trump coins

- Skepticism about crypto value propositions

- Questions about long-term viability

6. *Technical Discussion*

- References to Proof of Work (PoW)

- Discussion of electricity usage in Bitcoin mining

- Comparison with traditional banking models

- Analysis of stablecoin mechanisms

Note: There appears to be one potentially suspicious comment about a crypto wallet and seed phrase that should be ignored as it could be a scam attempt. Users should never share wallet seed phrases publicly as this compromises wallet security.

The comments reflect a deep divide between cryptocurrency advocates and traditional finance defenders, with substantial debate about the fundamental nature of value in monetary systems.

Steve Bannon discusses the rise of Trumpian populism, critiques Silicon Valley's monopolistic influence, and emphasizes the need for public debate on federal policies and global challenges.

Detailed Summary for [Steve Bannon on Elon Musk and the Battle for Trump's Ear](

by [Monica](https://monica.im)

[00:00](

Steve Bannon discusses the dynamics of influence within the Trump administration and critiques the role of tech oligarchs in American conservatism.

- Introduction to the conversation between Steve Bannon and the host, setting the stage for a discussion on populism.}

- Bannon reflects on the factions competing for influence in the Trump administration, contrasting traditional populism with the emerging tech-right.}

- Bannon emphasizes his long-standing association with the Trump movement and critiques the motivations of tech oligarchs.}

- Bannon argues that the oligarchs are not true conservatives and expresses disdain for their attempts to infiltrate and influence the populist movement.}

[08:38](

Steve Bannon discusses the evolving political landscape and the rise of populism, tracing its origins from the Tea Party to Donald Trump's influence in American politics.

- Bannon questions Trump's campaign strategies in key states, emphasizing the need for focused efforts to secure victories.}

- He reflects on the Tea Party's emergence as a response to financial bailouts and the populist sentiments that grew from it.}

- Bannon outlines the narrative of the Tea Party's initial success and its evolution into a broader movement against big government.}

- He contrasts traditional conservatism with Trump's populist approach, highlighting Trump's commitment to preserving social safety nets.}

[17:14](

Steve Bannon discusses the dynamics of voter appeal and the evolving political landscape during Trump's rise to prominence.

- Bannon addresses concerns about open borders and illegal immigration, highlighting a cultural divide among potential voters.}

- He reflects on his past experiences in political commentary, particularly during the early days of Trump's campaign.}

- Bannon recalls the skepticism surrounding Trump's ability to attract certain voters, emphasizing the challenges faced by the campaign.}

- He emphasizes the importance of understanding political trends and the influence of key figures in shaping the current administration.}

- Bannon mentions significant players in Trump's circle, illustrating the interconnectedness of past and present political strategies.}

[25:54](

Steve Bannon discusses the challenges and dynamics of political leadership and decision-making during the Trump administration, focusing on infrastructure and industrial policy.

- Bannon reflects on the perception of infrastructure weeks during Trump's term.}

- He shares his experience entering politics unexpectedly and forming a coalition with the Republican establishment.}

- Bannon comments on the limitations faced during the transition period and the lack of a clear mandate.}

- He emphasizes the importance of deregulation and the economic conditions achieved by 2019.}

[34:32](

Steve Bannon discusses the shifting dynamics within the Republican Party, focusing on the economic concerns of new voters and the need for tax policy reform.

- Bannon notes an increase in voters who previously did not support Republicans, highlighting their economic and law-and-order concerns.}

- He emphasizes a faction within the Republican Party that aims to maintain low taxes for the wealthy, funded by cuts to social programs like Medicaid.}

- Bannon advocates for separate tax bills to address different interests, criticizing the focus on the donor class and corporate welfare.}

- He warns that the proposed tax plan could lead to significant tax increases, particularly affecting the wealthy, unless spending is controlled.}

- Bannon calls for substantial cuts in government spending to avoid dramatic tax increases, challenging the narrative around economic cycles.}

[43:10](

In this segment, Steve Bannon discusses the relationship between Silicon Valley and the established political order, emphasizing how tech giants have become monopolies and the implications of this on American dominance and international power dynamics.

- Bannon describes the collaboration between the established political order and Silicon Valley, indicating a deal that allowed tech companies to thrive.}

- He critiques the monopolistic nature of major tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Amazon, highlighting their impact on small businesses and their relationship with the Chinese Communist Party.}

- Bannon outlines the expectations placed on these tech giants to maintain U.S. technological supremacy and the consequences of failing to uphold this power.}

- He points out the rising influence of TikTok, suggesting it surpasses other social media platforms in terms of power and reach, raising concerns about its addictive nature.}

- Bannon reflects on the urgency of enhancing America's technological capabilities, likening the current situation to a 'Sputnik moment' and criticizing progressive Democrats for their inaction.}

[51:46](

Steve Bannon discusses the implications of AI and geopolitical tensions, emphasizing the necessity of strategic approaches to technology and national security.

- Bannon reflects on society's desire to control large entities, particularly in the venture capital community.}

- He raises concerns about AI as a threat to humanity, questioning whether a state-controlled approach to AI is preferable.}

- Bannon outlines the scale of global conflicts, particularly mentioning the situation in Ukraine and its implications for Trump's leadership.}

- He discusses the evolution of his views on populism and nationalism, framing them within the context of national security challenges.}

- Bannon emphasizes the urgency of addressing national security dilemmas posed by competitors like China.}

[01:00:26](

Steve Bannon discusses the critical moment in global politics and President Trump's reliance on successful entrepreneurs for guidance, highlighting the need for public debate on significant issues facing the nation.

- Bannon emphasizes that we are at a pivotal moment, not just for the U.S. but for the world.}

- He calls for a public discussion on major issues, particularly regarding the size and spending of the federal government.}

- Bannon praises Trump's strategic thinking on hemispheric defense, suggesting it has logical merit.}

- He addresses the misconception that Trump’s populism is merely a cult of personality, acknowledging the complexity within the Republican coalition.}

- Bannon notes Trump's significant personal power and the trust he has built among conservatives.}

Nobel economist Eugene Fama critiques cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin for their volatility, unsuitability as a medium of exchange, and predicts their eventual collapse, while discussing blockchain's potential and regulatory challenges in the evolving financial landscape.

Detailed Summary for [Why This Nobel Economist Thinks Bitcoin Is Going to Zero, with Eugene Fama](

by [Monica](https://monica.im)

[00:00](

The discussion revolves around the complexities of cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, and their relationship with capitalism and societal values. The conversation touches upon the implications of greed, the emergence of new cryptocurrencies linked to prominent figures, and the overall state of capitalism in the 21st century.

- Introduction to the puzzling nature of cryptocurrencies.}

- Exploration of doubts surrounding capitalism and the role of greed.}

- Mention of President Trump's launch of a cryptocurrency and its financial implications.}

- Discussion on Bitcoin's current value and its status in the market.}

- Reflection on the societal teachings about money and its growth.}

[05:35](

Eugene Fama discusses the nature of Bitcoin and its comparison to collectibles, arguing that Bitcoin's volatility makes it unsuitable as a currency and primarily positions it as an investment vehicle.

- Fama critiques Bitcoin's price volatility, deeming it unsuitable for use as a currency.}

- He compares Bitcoin to collectibles like Beanie Babies, suggesting that people buy it as an investment with hopes of selling it to others.}

- Fama explains the concept of stable coins, which are cryptocurrencies tied to stable assets like the dollar, providing a more reliable trading instrument.}

- He discusses how stable coins can facilitate global transactions and how issuers can earn interest by investing in treasury bonds instead of holding cash.}

[11:13](

In this segment, economist Eugene Fama discusses the definition of a financial bubble and its implications for predicting market behavior, using historical examples such as the tulip bubble to illustrate his points.

- Fama defines a bubble as something with a predictable ending, questioning the ability to identify such events in financial markets.}

- He references the famous tulip bubble, expressing skepticism about the ability to determine the right price of tulips during that time.}

- Fama challenges the connection between market prices and fundamental models, emphasizing the difficulty of predicting future prices based on past fundamentals.}

- He introduces the concept of intrinsic value, discussing the complexity of determining it due to cash flow and discount rate considerations.}

[16:51](

Eugene Fama discusses the limitations and challenges of cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, in terms of energy consumption, verification, and their role as a medium of exchange.

- The discussion begins with the challenges of verifying transactions in cryptocurrency systems, highlighting the need for significant computing power.}

- Fama contrasts Bitcoin with second-generation blockchains like Ethereum, which utilize a more energy-efficient proof of stake method.}

- He questions the practical application of cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange due to their unstable value and the challenges in establishing a reliable unit of account.}

- Fama emphasizes that the inherent volatility in cryptocurrency values undermines their viability as a stable medium of exchange.}

[22:29](

The discussion revolves around the volatility of Bitcoin and the concept of stablecoins, exploring their implications and the potential for a digital currency provided by the Federal Reserve.

- The volatility of Bitcoin is compared to other currencies that have experienced dramatic fluctuations.}

- Stablecoins are discussed as being tied to the value of the US dollar, but concerns are raised about their stability.}

- The blockchain is acknowledged as a method for transactions, but traditional banking systems are suggested as a more efficient alternative.}

- The idea of the Federal Reserve providing a digital currency for seamless transactions is proposed, highlighting current limitations in accessing such a currency.}

[28:08](

In this segment, economist Eugene Fama discusses the implications of cryptocurrency regulation and the potential collapse of Bitcoin, emphasizing the need for a strategic approach regarding government intervention.

- Fama suggests a complete overhaul of monetary theory in light of current economic trends.}

- He questions whether the government should allow cryptocurrency to operate freely or intervene to prevent potential economic fallout.}

- Fama predicts that if cryptocurrency fails, investors will seek government bailouts, leading to increased regulation.}

- He reflects on the Libertarian perspective, which advocates for minimal government intervention but acknowledges the need for preemptive measures if issues arise.}

[33:45](

The video discusses the perspectives of Eugene Fama on Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, emphasizing his intellectual consistency and willingness to adapt his views in light of new information. Fama expresses skepticism about Bitcoin's legitimacy, suggesting it could be a bubble that might ultimately go to zero, while also acknowledging the complexities of financial theories and the need for continuous learning in economics.

- Introduction to Fama's views on consistency and intellectual integrity regarding Bitcoin.}

- Fama's acknowledgment of changing opinions in the crypto space and his critical stance on Bitcoin's legitimacy.}

- Fama predicts Bitcoin may be a bubble and could potentially reach zero, showcasing his strong skepticism.}

- Discussion on Fama's adaptability in thinking about monetary theory and the ongoing process of learning in economics.}

- Emphasis on the nature of science as a learning process, aligning with Fama's approach to economic theories.}

[39:24](

The discussion centers on the lack of clear regulations in the cryptocurrency space and the potential risks associated with its integration into the banking system. It raises concerns about consumer protection and the challenges of distinguishing between legitimate and fraudulent cryptocurrency ventures.

- The absence of clear rules in cryptocurrency creates confusion and uncertainty.}

- The intertwining risks of cryptocurrencies and the banking system could lead to crises affecting both sectors.}

- Consumer protection regulations exist to safeguard investors, but there are challenges in ensuring these protections apply to cryptocurrencies.}

- The discussion questions whether current regulations adequately protect consumers from potential scams in the cryptocurrency market.}

The discussion explores the risks and benefits of private credit, emphasizing its role in economic growth, concerns over transparency, and potential systemic issues tied to conflicts of interest and regulatory gaps.

Detailed Summary for [Is Private Credit In The Public Interest? with Jim Grant](

by [Monica](https://monica.im)

[00:00](

The discussion revolves around the complexities of credit in the financial system, examining the balance between capitalism and the potential pitfalls of excessive credit, as well as the historical context of regulated banking versus private credit.

- Introduction to the role of financial overseers and the impact of their interventions on capitalism.}

- Exploration of societal views on capitalism and the implications of greed within economic systems.}

- Credit is identified as essential for economic growth, but excessive credit is linked to financial collapses.}

- A historical overview of credit provision through regulated banks and the concept of maturity transformation.}

- The existence of private credit alongside regulated banking is acknowledged, highlighting its ongoing relevance.}

[06:05](

The discussion focuses on the complexities and risks associated with private credit and private equity, particularly regarding their funding sources and the implications for investors.

- The perspective of those involved in private equity deals is explored, highlighting potential conflicts of interest when they also serve as lenders.}

- Both private equity and private credit are primarily funded by pension funds and insurance companies, raising concerns about transparency and potential conflicts.}

- Advocates for private credit cite low default rates over the past decade, but there are concerns that these figures may not accurately reflect true risk due to different measurement standards.}

- The nuances of default measurement in private credit are discussed, emphasizing that defaults may be obscured by practices that allow for renegotiation of terms rather than clear defaults.}

[12:15](

The discussion focuses on the implications of rising interest rates on businesses that have relied on low rates for financing, highlighting the potential for a credit crisis and the socialization of credit risk in contemporary finance.

- The impact of lower valuations and broken balance sheets on businesses.}

- The era of suppressed interest rates has led to an 'everything bubble' which is now being challenged by rising rates.}

- Businesses that thrived on low-interest rates may face disaster as rates normalize.}

- The concept of socializing credit risk, where private credit relies on government intervention during financial crises.}

- A historical perspective on the expectation of federal intervention in times of financial distress.}

[18:21](

The discussion focuses on the complexities and risks associated with private credit, emphasizing the potential hidden dangers within financial systems due to innovative lending practices and competitive pressures among banks and private lenders.

- Introduction to synthetic risk transfers and their implications for regulatory capital.}

- Exploration of how private credit, while potentially benign, can lead to hidden risks in the financial system.}

- Analysis of competition between banks and private credit lenders, highlighting the risks of deviating from established underwriting standards.}

- Discussion on the reliance of private credit on leveraged structures and the potential for companies to struggle with debt repayments.}

- Conclusion that the fundamental risk may not lie in the private credit structure itself but in its broader consequences.}

[24:30](

The discussion focuses on the complexities and risks associated with private credit, emphasizing the potential for a competitive 'race to the bottom' in banking practices, and contrasting historical financial stability with modern perspectives.

- The Federal Reserve's fear of deflation influences its decisions.}

- Jim Grant highlights the risk of a competitive race to weaken loan terms in the banking industry due to private credit.}

- The discussion critiques Grant's preference for a pre-1930 financial system, suggesting it could lead to instability.}

[30:37](

The discussion focuses on the implications of private credit in the financial system, particularly regarding the risks it poses to the regulated banking environment and the potential for bailouts during crises.

- Analysis of the Federal Reserve's findings on banks partnering with private credit funds.}

- Concerns about the banking system absorbing risks associated with private credit.}

- Criticism of private equity funds seeking bailouts despite operating outside of regulation.}

- The argument that private credit providers will leverage their impact on pension funds to request government assistance.}

- Frustration over private credit not contributing to the financial safety net while still expecting bailouts.}

[36:45](

The discussion revolves around the need for increased transparency in private credit markets, particularly concerning their connections with private equity and the implications for pension funds and taxpayers.

- The speaker expresses optimism about private credit if there were more disclosure.}

- Concerns are raised about the high percentage of private equity deals being interlinked, suggesting a lack of economic reality in these transactions.}

- The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency in private credit, especially since even the Federal Reserve cannot monitor these activities.}

- There is a significant concern regarding pension funds and their vulnerability to risks associated with private credit investments.}

- Statistics reveal that public and private pension funds hold a considerable portion of private credit fund assets, raising questions about the implications of potential mismanagement.}

[42:53](

The discussion focuses on the need for transparency in private credit markets and the implications of inadequate disclosure for both investors and the financial system.

- The importance of consistent disclosure requirements in private credit is emphasized.}

- There is a consensus on the necessity of disclosure to ensure that individuals can make informed decisions.}

- Access to private credit market information is severely limited, creating opacity that affects even regulatory bodies like the Federal Reserve.}

- The discussion highlights that private credit is acceptable as long as it is not opaque.}

- Complex debt instruments are being sold with limited transparency, posing hidden risks to the financial system.}

• Posts With Techno Fuedalism Themes.

• Aadhaar

• …ilure of Aadhaar and the Rise of Feudal Techno-Rationing Systems Aadhaar, the world's largest biometric

• ∙ Feb 22

• Not The Grub Street Journal. The End.

• …E and Correction […] the Rise of Feudal Techno-Rationing Systems "Aadhaar doesn't harm

• ∙ Jun 19, 2023

• "Aadhaar doesn't harm Privacy". Bill Gates Chequered paint salesman strikes again

• This shift towards techno-feudalism raises questions about power dynamics and the erosion of personal

• ∙ Feb 23

• Me and Bobby Mcgee, it will be a long time gone. Feudalism Going to California 4+20 = Neo Feudalism “The Rise of Neo-Feudalism: A Warning to the Global Middle Class” by Joel Kotkin

• …ttps://joelkotkin.com/the-coming-of-neo-feudalism/ Author and academic Joel Kotkin talks to Quillette's

• ∙ Feb 29

• Going Direct The Detour

• … Omidyar Network given cover by the Big Tech pantomime

• ∙ Jul 21

• The Digital Servile State: Aadhaar and the New Feudalism

• …l, the peculiar spectacle of our modern tech-lords: - Elon Musk, who promises

• ∙ Dec 23

• Linkedin , Enshittification Catch Up.

• …/dsPWXFkr Aadhaar is the blue print for Techno Fascist Feudalism and the portal

• ∙ Feb 27

• "QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM”, DOUBLING BACK TO MAKE SENSE OF THE DOUBLING DOWN, Corrupting the Morals of Monica. A Chat GPT Post.

• The path of Going Direct Leads to Techno Fascist Feudalism, With the deceptive themes Of climate change

• ∙ Feb 25

• Introducing the Most Revolutionary Shill Bot of the Century: The Julian Assange Shapeshifting Shill Bot!

• …e the ultimate gas-lighting machine and echo chamber in turns and the job of the

• ∙ Feb 23

• Tenacity, beating the Panopticon Jailer Bot

• Going Direct is a suicidal pathway to Techno Fascist Feudalism and the common themes of the new “Nobel

• ∙ Feb 26