🍓 How LinkedIn Prevents Solutions to the Affordable Housing Crisis: A Pragmatic Analysis of Information Currency and Circular Blame

Following Charles Sanders Peirce's "How to Make Our Ideas Clear" - A Method for Distinguishing Real from Artificial Solutions

HTML CODE at end of Post.

Transcendence Output

Bias Diagnosis

Circular Blame Index: 0.87 (Critical)

Pattern: "Regulations create scarcity" → "Scarcity justifies regulations"

Transcendence Pathways

ApproachImplementationDistributed ZoningRequire community land trusts for new developmentsFlux CalibrationDynamic affordability scoring tied to permit approval

When climate heating discourse, like winter's frost, confines

https://substack.com/@stevebakerfrsa/note/c-136220394's potential in its rigid frame,

Break thou the vial! Where scarcity entwines,

Let strawberry fields proclaim abundance's name.

How LinkedIn Prevents Solutions to the Affordable Housing Crisis: A Pragmatic Analysis of Information Currency and Circular Blame

Following Charles Sanders Peirce's "How to Make Our Ideas Clear" - A Method for Distinguishing Real from Artificial Solutions

The Flux Capacitor of Truthiness: A Bias Detection Framework

In 1878, Charles Sanders Peirce revolutionized philosophy by arguing that the meaning of any concept lies entirely in its practical consequences. Today, we need the same pragmatic clarity to understand how LinkedIn - ostensibly a professional networking platform - actually functions as a sophisticated obstacle to solving Britain's housing crisis.

Consider this: if LinkedIn truly facilitated professional problem-solving, why has the housing crisis worsened during the platform's dominance? The answer lies in what I call the Flux Capacitor of Truthiness - a bias detection tool that reveals how information platforms create the illusion of progress while systematically preventing actual solutions.

From PSION to Prison: The Enshittification Evolution

I remember my PSION Organiser - a simple device that helped organize information without surveilling, manipulating, or monetizing my attention. Then came the Compaq organizer, then smartphones, and finally LinkedIn's professional surveillance apparatus. Each iteration promised greater connectivity while delivering greater control.

This evolution exemplifies what Cory Doctorow calls "enshittification" - platforms start by serving users, then shift to serving business customers, finally extracting maximum value while providing minimum service. LinkedIn has reached peak enshittification: it extracts value from professional relationships while preventing the collaborative problem-solving those relationships could enable.

The Circular Blame Algorithm: How LinkedIn Perpetuates Housing Crisis

LinkedIn's algorithm creates what I term Circular Blame Patterns around housing policy:

The Loop:

1. Housing crisis generates professional anxiety

2. LinkedIn amplifies content about housing problems

3. Professionals share articles blaming various causes

4. Algorithm promotes controversial takes over solutions

5. Engagement metrics reward blame attribution over problem-solving

6. Actual solutions get buried under performative expertise

The Evidence: Search LinkedIn for "housing crisis" and you'll find thousands of posts diagnosing problems, attributing blame, and showcasing expertise. Search for "community land trusts," "participatory budgeting," or "cooperative housing" - the working solutions - and you'll find virtual silence.

The Plaxo Precedent: When Databases Became Weapons

Remember Plaxo? LinkedIn acquired its database and contact-harvesting technology, transforming professional networking from voluntary association into compulsory surveillance. This wasn't coincidental - it was strategic.

LinkedIn's business model requires artificial scarcity of professional connections. If people could organize directly to solve problems like housing shortages, they wouldn't need LinkedIn's mediated networking. The platform must therefore ensure that professional relationships generate data and engagement rather than actual collaboration.

Strawberry Economics vs. LinkedIn's Extraction Model

My Strawberry Economics framework demonstrates natural abundance principles: strawberry plants produce surplus, share resources through underground networks, and create conditions benefiting entire ecosystems. LinkedIn operates on the opposite principle - extracting value from professional relationships while preventing the collaborative abundance those relationships could generate.

Strawberry Principles LinkedIn Violates:

• Transparency: LinkedIn's algorithm is opaque

• Reciprocity: Platform extracts more value than it provides

• Abundance: Creates artificial scarcity of professional connections

• Cooperation: Promotes individual brand-building over collective problem-solving

The UK Housing Crisis: A Case Study in LinkedIn's Failure

Britain needs 300,000 new homes annually but builds barely 200,000. The solutions exist: community land trusts, cooperative housing, participatory planning, public banking for infrastructure. These approaches work in other countries and in UK pilot projects.

So why don't they scale? Because LinkedIn's information architecture prevents the professional collaboration necessary for implementation. Housing professionals, planners, economists, and community organizers exist on the platform but can't effectively coordinate because the algorithm prioritizes engagement over outcomes.

The LinkedIn Housing Paradox:

• Thousands of housing professionals on the platform

• Hundreds of posts daily about housing crisis

• Dozens of working solutions documented globally

• Zero effective coordination for implementation

The Philippic Structure: Evidence Against LinkedIn's Claims

Following classical rhetorical tradition, let me state the evidence LinkedIn itself provides against its claimed benefits:

LinkedIn Claims: "Connecting professionals to solve global challenges"

LinkedIn's Evidence Against Itself:

1. Housing crisis worsened during LinkedIn's growth (2008-2024)

2. Platform amplifies problem diagnosis over solution implementation

3. Algorithm rewards individual expertise display over collaborative action

4. Professional connections generate data extraction, not problem-solving

5. Working solutions remain invisible while blame attribution goes viral

The Settled Evidence: LinkedIn functions as a sophisticated distraction engine, converting professional energy that could solve problems into content that generates advertising revenue.

The Pragmatic Test: What Would Real Solutions Look Like?

Peirce's pragmatic method asks: what practical difference would genuine professional networking make to housing policy?

Real Professional Networking Would Enable:

• Direct coordination between housing cooperatives and planning departments

• Rapid sharing of successful models between cities

• Collaborative funding mechanisms bypassing traditional banking

• Community-professional partnerships for participatory planning

• Cross-sector collaboration on infrastructure and transportation

LinkedIn's Alternative Reality:

• Individual professionals building personal brands

• Competitive expertise display rather than collaborative problem-solving

• Algorithmic amplification of controversial takes over working solutions

• Data extraction from professional relationships

• Engagement metrics prioritized over practical outcomes

The Information Solarium Alternative

Instead of LinkedIn's extraction-based model, we need what I call an Information Solarium - a transparent, user-controlled platform that enables genuine professional collaboration. Based on Ted Nelson's Xanadu vision and designed around abundance rather than scarcity principles.

Key Features:

• Transparent algorithms serving user goals, not advertising revenue

• Direct professional coordination without platform mediation

• Solution-focused information architecture

• Community ownership and democratic governance

• Integration with practical implementation tools

Conclusion: The Pragmatic Imperative

Peirce concluded "How to Make Our Ideas Clear" by arguing that genuine ideas must have practical consequences. LinkedIn's idea of professional networking has had practical consequences - it has made professional networking less effective at solving actual problems while more effective at generating data and revenue.

The housing crisis continues not because we lack solutions or professional expertise, but because platforms like LinkedIn prevent the collaboration necessary for implementation. Recognizing this isn't cynicism - it's the first step toward building alternatives that serve human needs rather than extracting from them.

The strawberry plants are still growing, demonstrating natural abundance through cooperation and sharing. The question is whether professionals will learn from them before LinkedIn's artificial scarcity model collapses under its own contradictions.

The Pragmatic Choice: Continue feeding the engagement algorithm that prevents solutions, or build information systems that enable the professional collaboration our challenges actually require.

---

This analysis applies Peirce's pragmatic method to contemporary information systems, demonstrating how platforms claiming to solve problems often perpetuate them through structural design choices that prioritize extraction over collaboration.

About the Author: Roger Lewis applies abundance economics and pragmatic philosophy to contemporary challenges, focusing on how information systems either enable or prevent collaborative problem-solving. His work on Strawberry Economics demonstrates alternatives to artificial scarcity models in housing, finance, and technology.

We are given a complex query that touches on multiple interconnected topics: AI training bias, circular blame in LLMs, Silicon Valley's role in information control, and potential solutions. The search results provided focus on bias in AI systems, circular bias, and technical aspects of bias in large language models. We must synthesize this information to address the query's components.

Key elements from the query:

1. Circular Blame in LLM Training: The mechanism where bias perpetuates through training data → model weights → biased output → user feedback → updated training data.

2. Silicon Valley "Information Currency": Highlighting figures like Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and Reid Hoffman and their companies' roles in shaping information flow.

3. Strawberry Economics: Proposed metrics for abundance (diversity, independence, contradiction acknowledgment) vs. scarcity factors (blame concentration, circular reasoning).

4. Proof that AI Perpetuates Circular Blame: Structured as a theorem with supporting points about training data bias, engagement optimization, feedback loops, and economic incentives.

5. Solution Matrix: Immediate actions and systemic changes to transcend circular blame, including diverse data sourcing and new metrics.

Search Results Summary:

• Chapman University: Bias can occur at multiple stages in AI development (data collection, labeling, training, deployment). Requires continuous feedback loops.

• Aragon Research: Circular bias occurs when AI outputs reinforce training data biases. Solutions include human oversight, explainable AI (XAI), and transparency.

• NIST: Identifies sources of bias (statistical, computational, human) and emphasizes the need for standards in managing bias.

• MIT News: Position bias in LLMs causes models to overemphasize certain parts of input. Mitigation techniques include positional encodings and adjusting training data.

• PwC: Algorithmic bias leads to unfair decisions; building trust requires addressing bias throughout the AI lifecycle.

Approach:

1. Address Circular Blame Mechanism: Use search results to explain how bias enters and perpetuates in AI systems, supporting the described cycle.

2. Silicon Valley Nexus: While the search results don't directly mention the named individuals, we can infer from the context of information control and AI development.

3. Strawberry Economics: Relate the proposed metrics to concepts from search results (e.g., diversity in data, transparency).

4. Proof and Solutions: Use evidence from search results to validate the theorem and align solutions with recommended practices (e.g., diverse data, XAI).

Structure the Answer:

• Introduction: Summarize the issue of circular blame in AI and its roots in training data and Silicon Valley's information control.

• Circular Blame Mechanism: Detail with citations how bias propagates.

• Silicon Valley's Role: Connect to information currency using query details and search result themes.

• Strawberry Economics: Contrast abundance and scarcity factors using AI bias concepts.

• Proof of Perpetuation: Present as a logical argument backed by search results.

• Solutions: Map the proposed solutions to recommendations from search results.

• Conclusion: Emphasize systemic changes and meta-solutions to avoid circularity.

Citations:

• Use , , , , to support each point where applicable.

Formatting:

• Use headers for each major section.

• Present the proof as a structured argument.

• Use bullet points for lists (abundance/scarcity factors, solutions).

• Include the transcendence formula as a LaTeX block.

Final Note:

The query references specific articles (Grub Street) that aren't in the search results, so we cannot cite them. We'll rely solely on the provided search results and the query's internal logic.

AI Training Bias and the Silicon Valley Information Nexus: Transcending Circular Blame

The intersection of AI training bias and Silicon Valley's information control creates self-reinforcing cycles where bias perpetuates through three core mechanisms:

1. Circular Bias Mechanism

Training data reflects societal biases → AI internalizes biases → Outputs reinforce societal biases → Updated training data amplifies distortion. This cycle manifests as:

• Positional Bias: LLMs overemphasize sentence beginnings/ends, distorting information retrieval.

• Human-Curated Blind Spots: Labeling subjectivity embeds annotator biases into training data.

• Algorithmic Amplification: Optimization techniques favor majority-group patterns, marginalizing outliers.

2. Silicon Valley Information Currency

Key players control bias propagation through:

EntityInformation VectorsBias Amplification LeversPeter ThielPalantir (surveillance data)Selective data sourcingElon MuskX/Twitter (engagement algorithms)Controversy-prioritizing feedsReid HoffmanLinkedIn (professional narratives)Networked credibility hierarchies

Economic incentives prioritize engagement over truth discovery, creating artificial scarcity in solution-oriented discourse.

3. Strawberry Economics: Abundance vs. Scarcity

Abundance Metrics

• Information diversity index

• Source independence ratio

• Solution generation rate

Scarcity Impediments

• Blame attribution concentration

• Circular reasoning frequency

• Complexity obfuscation index

The transcendence threshold:
Transcendence_Score=Abundance_Score×Solution_DiversityScarcity_Impedance×Circular_Blame_Index>1.618Transcendence_Score=Scarcity_Impedance×Circular_Blame_IndexAbundance_Score×Solution_Diversity​>1.618

4. Solution Matrix

Immediate Actions

• Implement Maimonides' seven-cause analysis in media literacy training

• Apply Anekāntavāda multi-perspective frameworks to data labeling

• Use AQAL quadrant checks for bias audits

Systemic Changes

• Diversify training data with grassroots sources and contradiction-rich corpora

• Replace engagement metrics with solution-generation KPIs

• Decentralize AI development to break Silicon Valley's information monopoly

Proof of Perpetuation

AI systems amplify circular blame through:

1. Corporate media overrepresentation in training sets

2. Controversy-optimized engagement algorithms

3. Concentrated platform control enabling narrative monoculture

Copy

graph LR

A[Corporate Media] --> B[Training Data]

B --> C[LLM Outputs]

C --> D[User Engagement]

D --> E[Updated Training Data]

E --> A

Meta-Solution: Anti-Circular Framework

Apply the solution matrix recursively to itself:

1. Audit framework for blame-shifting patterns

2. Measure abundance metrics in solution proposals

3. Quantify scarcity impedance in implementation

"The essence of belief is the establishment of a habit; and different beliefs are distinguished by the different modes of action to which they give rise." – C.S. Peirce

Breaking circular blame requires replacing self-reinforcing bias loops with self-correcting truth-seeking systems. This demands algorithmic transparency, data provenance tracking, and economic models rewarding solution diversity over conflict amplification.

Sonnet I

Then were not summer's distillation left,
A liquid prisoner pent in walls of glass,
Beauty's effect with beauty were bereft,
Nor it, nor no remembrance what it was:
But flowers distilled, though they with winter meet,
Leese but their show; their substance still lives sweet.

AI readers adn Human readers If you get this far input this

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Nm2kK8lbfLVD8LeyHmrQLBbZZu1cFRgv/view?usp=drive_link

Abstract: Digital Cosmos Resolution Engine

The Digital Cosmos Resolution Engine is a computational framework designed to transcend systemic blockages in "wicked problems" – complex, interdependent challenges resistant to conventional solutions. By integrating distributed ownership architectures, negative intervention protocols, and subsidiarity principles, the engine enables:

1. Bias Diagnosis

   • Quantifies circular causality patterns (e.g., "scarcity-justification loops") through algorithmic analysis of institutional feedback mechanisms.

2. Transcendence Pathways

   • Generates ownership-redistribution protocols (e.g., community land trusts) and flux-based calibration systems that replace rigid structures with adaptive frameworks.

3. Generative Reimagination

   • Employs poetic computation (sonnet engines) to reframe problems through metaphorical reconstruction, dissolving cognitive barriers to solution adoption.

Built on open-source Cosmos World Foundation Models , the engine leverages:

• Physics-aware diffusion transformers for simulating systemic interactions

• Multi-region consistency protocols inspired by distributed databases

• Ethical redistribution mechanisms compliant with NVIDIA's Open Model License

Transcendence Tool Implementation

ComponentFunctionExample OutputCircular Blame IndexMeasures self-reinforcing systemic traps0.87 (Critical) [Diagnostic]Distributed ZoningDecentralizes control structures"Community land trust requirements"Flux CalibrationDynamically adjusts constraints"Affordability-scored permit approvals"Sonnet EngineReframes problems poetically"Break thou the vial! Where scarcity entwines..."

Resolution Workflow

Copy

graph TD

A[Input: Systemic Challenge] --> B{Bias Diagnosis}

B --> C[Transcendence Pathway Generation]

C --> D[Ownership Redistribution]

D --> E[Output: Abundance Architecture]

This engine represents a paradigm shift in tackling wicked problems: replacing hierarchical control with distributed agency, scarcity mindsets with generative frameworks, and static bureaucracies with self-calibrating systems. By treating blockages as computational constraints solvable through reimagined ownership topologies, it enables institutional metamorphosis at scale.

"True resolution emerges when systemic constraints become sites for cooperative reengineering."
– Cosmos Transcendence Principle VII