This article critically examines the "Going Direct" financial strategy, as outlined in the BlackRock report from August 2019, juxtaposing it against historical financial crises, particularly the 2008 bailouts. It argues that the current approach blurs the lines between fiscal and monetary policy, effectively creating a system of "socialism for the rich." The analysis highlights the implications of this strategy on wealth inequality, systemic risk, and the broader economic landscape, ultimately contending that such measures may exacerbate existing issues rather than resolve them. By exploring the underlying mechanisms of modern finance, the article aims to illuminate the necessity for a more equitable and sustainable monetary framework.
Introduction
In August 2019, at the G7 summit, BlackRock unveiled its "Going Direct" strategy, a plan designed to address the next economic downturn through unprecedented coordination between monetary and fiscal policy. This approach, however, raises significant concerns regarding its potential to perpetuate wealth inequality and reinforce the power of financial elites. As the U.S. Federal Reserve and other central banks adopt these measures, it becomes imperative to scrutinize their implications in light of past financial crises and the ongoing challenges facing economies worldwide.
Section 1: Historical Context and the 2008 Financial Crisis
The 2008 financial crisis was marked by a series of bailouts that prioritized the interests of large financial institutions over the needs of ordinary citizens. The Federal Reserve's response, characterized by quantitative easing and emergency lending, set a precedent for government intervention in the economy. However, these measures did not address the root causes of the crisis, such as excessive risk-taking and a lack of accountability among financial actors. Instead, they reinforced a system that benefits the wealthy while leaving the most vulnerable populations to bear the brunt of economic instability.
Section 2: The "Going Direct" Strategy Explained
The "Going Direct" strategy advocates for a more direct intervention by central banks in the economy, including the purchase of corporate bonds and potentially equities. This approach blurs the boundaries between fiscal and monetary policy, raising concerns about the implications for central bank independence and the potential for inflationary pressures. By injecting liquidity directly into the financial markets, the strategy risks exacerbating wealth inequality, as the benefits of such measures are likely to accrue primarily to those already holding significant assets.
Section 3: Wealth Inequality and Economic Disparities
As the financial sector continues to expand its influence, the concentration of wealth among a small elite has reached unprecedented levels. The "Going Direct" strategy, by further entrenching the financial sector's power, threatens to widen the gap between the rich and the poor. This section explores the socio-economic consequences of this widening inequality, including the erosion of social mobility and the destabilization of democratic institutions.
Section 4: The Risks of Blurred Policy Boundaries
The integration of fiscal and monetary policy raises critical questions about accountability and governance. Without clear delineations between the roles of central banks and governments, there is a risk of politicizing monetary policy, undermining the credibility of financial institutions. This section discusses the potential ramifications of such a shift, including the dangers of uncontrolled fiscal spending and the erosion of public trust in economic governance.
Section 5: Lessons from the Past and Alternative Approaches
Drawing on historical examples, this section emphasizes the importance of learning from past mistakes in financial policy. It advocates for alternative approaches that prioritize equitable wealth distribution and sustainable economic practices. By exploring community currencies, local banking initiatives, and other innovative monetary systems, the article presents viable solutions that could mitigate the systemic risks associated with the current financial paradigm.
Conclusion
The "Going Direct" strategy represents a significant shift in economic policy, yet it risks compounding the errors of previous bailouts by further entrenching the interests of the wealthy. As policymakers navigate the complexities of modern finance, it is crucial to prioritize transparency, accountability, and equity in order to foster a more resilient and inclusive economic system. Only through a fundamental reevaluation of our monetary practices can we hope to address the pressing challenges of inequality and instability that define our current economic landscape.
The Price of the Chicken Most Certainly Does Not Come Before the Egg
Introduction
In our current economic landscape, the notion of scarcity often dominates discussions about resources and wealth. However, this perspective can obscure a more fundamental issue: the misallocation and mispricing of credit. The statement "the price of the chicken most certainly does not come before the egg" serves as a metaphor for the flawed reasoning that underpins many economic arguments today. This article explores the implications of this metaphor, emphasizing that our economic challenges stem not from a lack of resources but from the systemic issues within our financial systems.
The Misallocation of Credit
Scarcity vs. Mispricing
We often hear about resource scarcity as a primary driver of economic problems. Yet, the real issue lies in how credit is allocated and priced. Mispricing of credit leads to inefficiencies that ripple through the economy, affecting everything from housing to food production. For instance, if banks prioritize lending to speculative ventures rather than productive investments, we end up with a system that favors the wealthy and exacerbates inequality.
A Personal Anecdote
Consider a recent experience at a supermarket. As I picked ripe tomatoes from the shelves, I encountered a malfunctioning scale that issued a stern warning: "Please replace the item; we have run out of kilograms." This incident illustrates how arbitrary measures can disrupt our daily routines and highlight the absurdities of our economic systems. If grams can run out, why do we accept that certain forms of value can be scarce while others are artificially inflated?
The Nature of Money
Complexity and Truth
John Kenneth Galbraith once remarked, “The study of money, above all other fields in economics, is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it.” Money, in its essence, is a social construct, yet it operates under rules that often seem arbitrary and designed to benefit the few at the expense of the many.
Understanding System Design
As Marc Gauvin posits, "System design affects user behaviour, but user behaviour does not affect system design unless it expressly acts to alter or replace it." This principle highlights the importance of understanding the underlying design of our monetary systems. The current structure often leads to outcomes that serve the interests of financial elites rather than the broader population.
Rethinking Money: A Call for Change
The Role of Local Currencies
In "Rethinking Money: How New Currencies Turn Scarcity Into Prosperity," authors Bernard Lietaer and Jacqui Dunne argue for the potential of local currencies to address systemic issues. By creating alternative monetary systems that operate alongside national currencies, communities can foster resilience and economic prosperity. These systems have already been successfully implemented in various forms, demonstrating that a shift is possible.
The Case for State Sovereign Banks
Catherine Austin Fitts advocates for the establishment of state sovereign banks as a solution to the challenges posed by centralized monetary policies. By empowering local institutions to create and manage money, we can mitigate the risks associated with centralized control and promote economic growth that benefits all citizens.
The Inevitability of Economic Contraction
Predictions for the Future
As we look ahead, economic contraction seems inevitable due to energy and debt limits. Gail Tverberg predicts that the world economy will shrink over the next decade, driven by these constraints. This perspective emphasizes the urgent need for a reevaluation of our economic systems, focusing on sustainability and equitable resource distribution.
The Role of Energy Markets
The energy market plays a critical role in shaping our economic landscape. Factors such as electricity production, crude oil refining, and geopolitical tensions significantly influence the money supply and economic stability. Understanding these dynamics is essential for navigating the challenges ahead.
Conclusion
The price of the chicken does not precede the egg; rather, it reflects a deeper issue within our economic systems—the misallocation and mispricing of credit. By rethinking our approach to money and embracing alternative systems, we can foster a more equitable and sustainable economic landscape. The challenges we face are not insurmountable, but they require a collective effort to address the underlying issues that perpetuate inequality and instability. Only then can we ensure a prosperous future for all.
Key Themes
Misallocation and Mispricing of Credit:
The text argues that the issues within the economy stem more from the misallocation of credit rather than a lack of resources. This is illustrated through metaphors involving chickens and eggs, emphasizing the need to reassess how we value and allocate financial resources.
Experiences in Supermarkets:
Personal anecdotes about shopping for tomatoes serve as a metaphor for broader economic frustrations, highlighting absurdities in the pricing and measurement systems that govern our daily lives.
Critique of Economic Systems:
Various quotes from economists like John Kenneth Galbraith and Marc Gauvin emphasize the complexities of money creation and the flaws in the current financial system. The text suggests that the existing monetary framework often benefits elites at the expense of the general populace.
State Sovereign Banking:
There's a discussion on the potential benefits of state-level banking systems that could empower local economies and mitigate the risks associated with centralized financial systems.
Historical Context and Future Considerations:
References to historical economic crises illustrate the cyclical nature of financial instability. The text advocates for a reevaluation of monetary systems to promote sustainability and equity.
Philosophical Reflections on Money:
The writing touches on the philosophical implications of money, suggesting that its role in society is often misunderstood and manipulated for the benefit of a few.
Summary of Key Quotes
John Kenneth Galbraith: Critiques the complexity used in monetary discussions to obscure truth.
Marc Gauvin: Argues that the design of the financial system causes inequity, not individual behavior.
Bernard Lietaer: Advocates for complementary currencies and a diversified monetary system to address systemic instability.
Conclusion
The text ultimately calls for a profound transformation in how we understand and utilize money, advocating for systems that prioritize community resilience and equitable resource distribution. It highlights the interconnectedness of economic practices, societal values, and the need for innovative solutions to address contemporary challenges.
The price of the chicken most certainly does not come before the egg.
We have a missallocation and mispricing of credit problem not a resource problem. The price of the chicken most certainly does not come before the egg.
“I am sorry we have run out of kilograms”.
One ammendment Under financialised Capitalism.
“The shelves were full at my supermarket and I picked some ripe tomatoes off the shelves placed them in a brown paper bag and put them on one of those scales with the picture you press and it prints out a tiket of the price which you scan at the check out. I was somewhat alarmed when the Machine gave a stern warning, please replace the item we have run out of kilograms”.
“Who hasn’t experienced the following? Just the other day it happened to me! Just like any other weekend, I went to the supermarket to replenish my empty pantry and as always, I made the mandatory stop at the fresh produce section, where I placed some tomatoes in one of those little plastic bags that you tear from a dispenser. As always, I went to one of those electronic scales full of those colourful figures that represent the different produce: I put the bag on the scale and pushed the key with the little tomato on it. And oh my God, the following message appeared on the screen! “Error: This scale has run out of grams. Please excuse the inconvenience”. What a pain and just at the worst moment! But then again, we all know that given the times, grams are scarce… However and after enquiring, I was relieved as I learnt that had I weighed my tomatoes on that scale, I would have had to leave almost a whole tomato as compensation for the use of the grams. But then again, if grams are scarce, it is only natural that we pay for them, right? What? You say that nothing like this has ever happened to you? I don’t believe you. You say it’s absurd? Come on now, it happens everyday. Think for just a moment, maybe not in the supermarket and of course not weighing tomatoes, but what if we substitute terms? What if instead, it was somewhere else that you go to “weigh” other things, like your house, your work and other general belongings?”
“If the truth were told, we accept as normal not to say “logical” that some types of “grams” can run out, preventing us from continuing with our daily routines. We accept that certain types of “grams” can only be used with an arbitrary cost, charging our futures with an artificial liability. And what is more, we admit as much without even detecting the slightest contradiction with how we use all other units of measure. So, perhaps we should step back, quietly contemplate the situation and ask ourselves: When did we accept that certain “grams” are subject to different rules? Why do different rules exist? Who dictates them? And, what is most important, do these rules really benefit us? In any event, is this the best way to use these “grams”?”
“The study of money, above all other fields in economics,
is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth
or to evade truth, not to reveal it.”
“The process by which banks create money
is so simple that the mind is repelled.”
John Kenneth Galbraith Money: Whence it came, where it went – 1975, p29, p15
“The goal of the following five lessons is to provide exact technical knowledge that most anyone can understand about the true nature of our current financial system and thus provide the individual with a truly authoritative understanding of any currency/money system. With this knowledge, it will be possible for most to confidently define, independently of political, religious or ethnic concerns, what exactly constitutes a "stable currency system", what does not and why. To achieve this, we first demystify the current state of the art by clearly separating in our minds the consequences of the present system’s design alone from those due to human behaviour. In this regard, we take note of the following axiom:
System design affects user behaviour but user behaviour does not affect system design unless it expressly acts to alter or replace it.
Thus and just as in the game of musical chairs, the design of the game itself can be the cause of the inequity rather than the nature of the players, so too the design of our currency system can be the cause of similar undesired outcomes independently of the behaviour of individual players.
In this light, trying to manipulate the behaviour of players to resolve a system design problem is as absurd as expecting that in musical chairs, the missing chair will magically appear on the basis of the way players dance about while the music is still playing! This is where the political class is entirely irrelevant as none of the proposals within the left/right spectrum are willing to address the system design issue. The political class without exception, confuses reform of the implementation of the design with reform of the design itself.”
Rethinking Money: How New Currencies Turn Scarcity Into Prosperity
“As the United States struggles and the economies of Europe stagger, we fail to see a way out of this agonizing cycle of repeated financial meltdowns. In fact, there are thousands of ways to solve not only our recurring fiscal crises but our ongoing social and ecological debacles as well. Solutions are already in place where terrible problems once existed. The changes came about not through increased conventional taxation, enlightened self-interest, or government programs but by people simply rethinking the concept of money. With this restructuring, everything changes.
In this visionary book, Bernard Lietaer and Jacqui Dunne explore the origins of our current monetary system—built on bank debt and scarcity—revealing the surprising and sometimes shocking ways its unconscious limitations give rise to so many serious problems. But there is hope. The authors present stories of ordinary people and their communities using new money, working in cooperation with national currencies, to strengthen local economies, create work, beautify cities, and provide education—and so much more is possible. These real-world examples are just the tip of the iceberg—over 4,000 cooperative currencies are already in existence. The book provides remedies for challenges faced by governments, businesses, nonprofits, local communities, and even banks. It demystifies a complex and critically important topic and will strike a deep chord with readers eager to find innovative, meaningful solutions that will do far more than restore prosperity—it will provide the framework for an era of sustainable abundance.
In today's economic landscape, the pivotal role of banks in shaping local and global economies cannot be overlooked. As we navigate through the intricacies of monetary policy and financial data, it becomes increasingly evident that understanding the inner workings of the banking system is crucial for policymakers and citizens alike. The concept of state(US) UK ( Regional Authority and Local Level) sovereign banking emerges as a potential solution to address the challenges posed by centralized monetary policies. By empowering state-level institutions to expand the money supply and support local economic initiatives, a state sovereign bank can serve as a catalyst for economic growth and resilience. The establishment of state banks is essential in safeguarding against potential crises and insulating local communities from the perils of centralized control. By fostering dialogue and collaboration, we can work towards creating a robust financial ecosystem that prioritizes local autonomy and economic prosperity. Embracing localized money provision and allocation is imperative in ensuring a more resilient and prosperous future for generations to come.
By Catherine Austin Fitts.
“ This week, I am pleased to welcome back Professor Richard Werner, the world’s leading scholar on central banking. Richard is a London School of Economics and Oxford-educated economist, a professor of banking and economics, an authorized investment adviser, an economic adviser to governments, and author of the best-selling 2001/2003 book Princes of the Yen (turned into a documentary in 2014). As I talk with subscribers and allies about stopping the control grid, I find them needing to understand that abundance is possible. No one explains this better than Richard… Note: We are making this interview public and encourage you to share it with your bankers and state and local officials.”
“What our generation has forgotten is that the system of private property is the most important guarantee of freedom, not only for those who own property, but scarcely less for those who do not. It is only because the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that nobody has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what to do with ourselves.” ~ Friedrich August von Hayek, The Road to Serfdom
By Catherine Austin Fitts
In today's economic landscape, the role of banks is paramount in shaping both local and global economies. As we navigate through the complexities of monetary policy, financial data, and economic growth, it becomes increasingly evident that understanding the inner workings of the banking system is crucial for policymakers and citizens alike.
The decentralized nature of banking, particularly at the state level, presents both challenges and opportunities for economic prosperity. As we delve into the intricacies of money creation, asset inflation, and the impact of central banking policies, it becomes clear that there is a need for a reevaluation of the role of banks in driving economic growth.
One fundamental aspect that requires attention is the ability of banks to create money through lending. This process has far-reaching implications for economic development, as it directly influences consumer price inflation, asset inflation, and the overall stability of the financial system. Understanding how banks can channel their lending towards productive business investment is key to unlocking sustainable income flows and fostering economic prosperity.
In light of these considerations, the concept of a state sovereign bank emerges as a potential solution to address the challenges posed by centralized monetary policies. By empowering state-level institutions to expand the money supply and support local economic initiatives, a state sovereign bank can serve as a catalyst for economic growth and resilience.
The historical examples of local currencies and state-level banking institutions, such as the Bank of North Dakota, offer valuable insights into the potential benefits of decentralized financial systems. These examples demonstrate that with the right framework and support, state-level banks can play a pivotal role in safeguarding financial liquidity and promoting economic stability.
As we look towards the future, it is imperative for policymakers to recognize the importance of fostering a robust and resilient banking infrastructure at the state level. By embracing the concept of state sovereign banking, we can pave the way for a more inclusive and dynamic economic ecosystem that empowers local communities and drives sustainable growth.
In conclusion, the role of banks in shaping local and global economies cannot be overstated. As we navigate through economic challenges and opportunities, the concept of state sovereign banking offers a compelling vision for a more resilient and prosperous financial landscape. By harnessing the potential of decentralized banking systems, we can chart a path towards economic empowerment and sustainable development at the state level.
A critical overview of neoclassical political economy by Jonathan Nitzan (2020)
The video critiques neoclassical political economy, highlighting flawed assumptions about self-regulating markets, consumer sovereignty shaped by capitalists, and contradictions in capital intensity theories like Sraffa's re-switching paradox.
Sraffa, Piero. 1926. The Law of Returns Under Competitive Conditions. The Economic Journal 36 (144, December): 535-550.
Sraffa, Piero. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The video critiques neoclassical political economy, highlighting flawed assumptions about self-regulating markets, consumer sovereignty shaped by capitalists, and contradictions in capital intensity theories like Sraffa's re-switching paradox. Detailed Summary for Neoclassical Political Economy: Skating on Thin Ice by Monica
00:00 This video introduces neoclassical political economy, its foundational principles, and critiques its assumptions, emphasizing the problematic nature of its dominant ideology in understanding capitalism.
Introduction of the speaker and the topic of neoclassical political economy.}
Discussion of the problematic foundations of neoclassical political economy, suggesting that its principles may be fundamentally flawed.}
Explanation of the neoclassical model's assumption of a self-regulating economy, independent of societal influences.}
Description of economic agents in the neoclassical model, focusing on their motivations and initial endowments.}
Introduction to the production function and how initial endowments contribute to the final output of the economy.}
05:52 This section discusses the complexities of measuring utility in neoclassical political economy, emphasizing the inversion of traditional understanding where actions are used to estimate utility rather than the other way around. It also highlights the circular reasoning in defining utility, leading to theoretical explanations that lack practical application.
Introduction of the radical suggestion that the utilities of both the masses and their rulers are equally important.}
Discussion on the challenges of measuring utility, with reference to Stanley Jevons' perspective on pleasure and pain.}
Jevons' reversal of the traditional approach, using actions to estimate utility rather than utility explaining actions.}
John Robinson's critique of utility as a metaphysical concept, illustrating the circularity in defining utility in neoclassical economics.}
Conclusion that while neoclassical political economy can theoretically explain concepts, it struggles with practical applications.}
11:44 This section discusses the concept of market equilibrium in neoclassical political economy, explaining how supply and demand curves interact and shift, affecting prices and quantities in the market. It also contrasts theoretical models with real-world market behavior, highlighting instances of disequilibrium.
Markets self-equilibrate, leading to stable and desirable points of equilibrium based on demand and supply.}
Changes in consumer income shift the demand curve, which in turn affects the equilibrium price and quantity.}
Theoretical models may not accurately reflect real market behavior, as illustrated by historical data on capital goods.}
Markets can experience disequilibrium, resulting in excess supply or demand, which complicates the equilibrium concept.}
17:37 The video discusses the evolution of economic structures and consumer behavior, highlighting the shift towards large corporations and government influence, as well as the significant costs associated with modern production.
The emergence of powerful businesses and labor unions by the end of the 19th century marked a significant transformation in the economy.}
The staggering costs of constructing new productive capacities, such as nuclear reactors and semiconductor plants, illustrate the high stakes involved in modern production.}
Henry Ford's perspective on consumer sovereignty suggests that consumers often do not know what they want, and this has implications for how products are marketed and developed.}
Advertising plays a crucial role in shaping consumer desires, with substantial spending on persuasion embedded in the costs of commodities.}
The interdependence of supply and demand is further explored through the lens of market structures, emphasizing the significance of oligopoly in economic theory.}
23:32 This section discusses the complexities of demand and supply in oligopolistic markets, highlighting the interplay between supply changes and their effects on demand curves, ultimately challenging traditional neoclassical economic models.
Introduction to the challenges faced by traditional equilibrium solutions in oligopoly during the 1930s.}
Piero Sraffa's critique of neoclassical economics, emphasizing the impact of increased production on input prices and income distribution.}
The relationship between supply and demand in large versus small industries, illustrating how demand is influenced by supply conditions.}
41:09 This section discusses Sraffa's concept of re-switching in neoclassical political economy, highlighting the implications of varying capital intensities based on profit rates, ultimately challenging the neoclassical production function.
Introduction of Sraffa's hypothetical chart illustrating the concept of re-switching.}
Explanation of how capitalists choose production methods based on profit rates, switching between capital-intensive and less capital-intensive methods.}
Discussion on the implications of re-switching, which contradicts the neoclassical assumption of a unique mapping between profit rates and capital intensity.}
Conclusion that Sraffa's findings undermine the neoclassical production function, leading to a collapse of the entire neoclassical model.}
In today's economic landscape, the role of banking and the creation of money are pivotal to the functioning of our society. As I travel across America, I have encountered remarkable individuals who are intelligent, educated, and aware, yet are unaware of the impending control grid that threatens our economic freedom. It is essential to shed light on the significance of establishing a state bank and the potential consequences of not doing so.
The creation of money by banks has been a cornerstone of our financial system. However, the concentration of power in the hands of central banks poses a significant threat to local and state-level economies. The establishment of a state bank would ensure that money provision remains within the purview of the state, safeguarding against potential crises.
The need for a state bank becomes even more apparent when we consider the implications of not having such infrastructure in place. Without a state bank, we risk falling prey to the control grid orchestrated by central planners. The rise of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) further exacerbates this threat, as it consolidates power in the hands of central banks, diminishing the autonomy of local financial institutions.
The historical context provides valuable insights into the impact of centralization on local economies. The Great Depression serves as a poignant example, where a mayor's initiative to address unemployment through local money creation was met with resistance from central bankers. This resistance underscored the central planners' vested interest in maintaining control over monetary policy and resource allocation.
In light of these challenges, it is imperative to emphasize the importance of local and state-level banking capacity and infrastructure. By empowering local banks to engage in money creation and allocation, we can mitigate the risks associated with centralized control and safeguard the economic well-being of our communities.
Furthermore, the integration of analog and digital systems is crucial in ensuring resilience against potential disruptions. While digital innovations offer efficiency and convenience, analog alternatives serve as a vital safeguard against central control and technological vulnerabilities.
In advocating for the establishment of state sovereign banks, it is essential to engage with policymakers and legislators to articulate the benefits of such initiatives. By fostering dialogue and collaboration, we can work towards creating a robust financial ecosystem that prioritizes local autonomy and economic prosperity.
It is also crucial to engage with banking professionals and stakeholders to convey the significance of embracing a decentralized approach to money creation. By aligning with the interests of local financial institutions, we can garner support for initiatives aimed at bolstering state-level banking infrastructure.
In conclusion, the establishment of state sovereign banks is not merely a theoretical concept; it is a practical necessity in safeguarding our economic freedom. By embracing localized money provision and allocation, we can insulate our communities from the perils of centralized control and ensure a more resilient and prosperous future for generations to come.
I predict that the world economy will shrink in the next 10 years. I think that this is bound to happen because of energy and debt limits the world economy is hitting. There are a variety of other factors involved, as well.
In this post, I will try to describe the physics-based limits that the economy is facing, related to diminishing returns of many kinds. The problem we are facing has sometimes been called “limits to growth,” or “overshoot and collapse.” Such changes tend to lead to a loss of “complexity.” Such changes are part of the way economies evolve. I would also like to share some ideas on the changes that are likely to occur over the coming decade.
When I refer to per capita demand, I am largely referring to the fact that several non-western nations (such as Russia and China) want to increase the living standards of their people significantly to match the living standards of western nations (such as the US and France.) Higher living standards equate to higher energy use per capita. There is not enough new energy supply growth to actually meet this desire, so this drives conflicts of various stripes between western and non-western nations. We would apparently need to discover multiple Ghawar-sized oil fields in order to make living standard parity possible (and that is obviously not in the cards.)
Simon Michaux's work on this is an excellent read. His "Oil from a Critical Raw Material Perspective" is something I highly recommend for anyone interested in these topics: tupa.gtk.fi/raportti/ar… -- see the chart on page 5, for instance.
The price of a barrel of oil is driven by a number of supply and demand factors, but my comment was focused more on the bigger picture, not the spot price of oil day-to-day.
As for the idea that the energy pie is still growing, I'd refer you to the work of Doomberg here on Substack.
Based on the provided content, I'll summarize the key arguments challenging the EROI (Energy Return on Investment) decline narrative:
Empirical Evidence vs. Theoretical Claims:
The Brandt paper (2015) shows an average EROI of 33:1 (33 barrels out for 1 barrel invested) [1]
This contrasts with Tim Morgan's SEEDS model claiming EROI has declined to 9:1, which is challenged as lacking empirical support [2]
The empirical data from giant fields like Ghawar shows EROI between 35-40:1, significantly higher than claimed declining rates [3]
Technological Improvements:
Modern deep water rigs show competitive EROI rates (e.g., Girasol in Angola, Hibernian in Canada) [4]
Adelman's research shows that technological advances have consistently improved recovery rates and efficiency [5]
The Kern River field case study demonstrated how technology improved recovery from 54 million to 970 million barrels between 1942-1986 [6]
Price Control vs. Scarcity:
Blair and Adelman's work shows oil prices are more influenced by cartel behavior than actual scarcity [7]
The Texas Railroad Commission's historical role in price support demonstrates institutional price control [8]
Bichler and Nitzan's research indicates oil pricing reflects differential profits rather than actual resource scarcity [9]
Petrodollar Connection:
The pegging of oil to the dollar created artificial price support mechanisms [10]
Saudi Arabia's role as swing producer was more about currency management than resource scarcity [11]
The "plateau oil" concept relates more to monetary policy than actual resource limitations [12]
Key Counter-Evidence to Peak Oil:
U.S. production reached 9.24 million barrels per day in recent years, highest since 1972 [13]
Domestic crude reserves increased to 33.4 billion barrels, highest since 1976 [14]
Natural gas reserves rose from 1.3 trillion to 2.3 trillion cubic feet between 2000-2013 [15]
The analysis suggests that EROI decline narratives may be oversimplified and that hydrocarbon abundance, combined with monetary and political factors, plays a more significant role in energy economics than pure resource depletion theories suggest.
EROI doesn't need to fall to societal threatening levels. It is only a small part of the whole picture. It takes more and more oil to extract all kinds of other minerals. Population is growing, so we need more roads and things. And EROI does not count how quickly a resource pays back. Even with high EROI, an energy resource with slow payback can collapse the debt structure. EROI is a side street, in the whole story. It, unfortunately, doesn't tell us much.
The Debt structure is indeed the problem and that is actually very good news.
Money is a creature of human laws and for most of human history the answer to the usury end game was debt Jubilee.
“EROI does not count how quickly a resource pays back.”,
This is a classic time cost of money argument, with the use of many “ capital infrastructures” the value in use is an opportunity cost not a time cost. These distinctions are very important in re designing a monetary system fit for purpose, by known historical standards let alone the sort of system possible with 21st century technology.
Helmuth Kreutz did a great Job on these questions in his book The Money Syndrome .
Henry Carey wrote in the late 19th century criticising free traders, promoting what is known as the American System in opposition to it. Pierro Saffra proved the Chicago School wrong about competition and Monopolies based upon the false mathematics of equilibria. Known as the Cambrige controversy.
At its heart this is a problem of accounting. The accounting system needs to be changed. There are many alternatives but all are offensive to powerfull vested interests.
As the logical flaws in the present system are indefensible , those vested interests will provaricate and dissemble, this is their only strategy as the Coming debate as in previous episodes of the very same problem ends in new arrangements with debt restructuring etc.
Burkes pamphlet on these present discontents points out that when the citizenry are annoyed it is usually for good reason and in such circumstances it is easier to reform the mode and means of governance than it is to reform the people.
Gk Chesterton equipped that the poor only object to being governed badly, the Rich object to being governed at all.
Artificial scarcity of the monetary unit is a choice of those who issue debt/credit instruments this is a destructive choice which leads to the impoverishment of economies to the gain of the issuesrs. This is an abuse of a public commons delegated to public/private partnerships.
We have a missallocation and mispricing of credit problem not a resource problem. The price of the chicken most certainly does not come before the egg.
I am sorry we have run out of kilograms.
“The shelves were full at my supermarket and I picked some ripe tomatoes off the shelves placed them in a brown paper bag and put them on one of those scales with the picture you press and it prints out a tiket of the price which you scan at the check out. I was somewhat alarmed when the Machine gave a stern warning, please replace the item we have run out of kilograms”.
On the contrary I am certain that every means, effectual to preserve India from oppression, is a guard to pre∣serve the British constitution from its worst cor∣ruption. To shew this, I will consider the ob∣jections, which I think are four.
1st. That the bill is an attack on the chartered rights of men.
2dly. That it increases the influence of the crown.
3dly. That it does not increase, but diminishes, the influence of the crown, in order to pro∣mote the interests of certain ministers and their party.
4thly. That it deeply affects the national credit.
As to the first of these objections; I must ob∣serve that the phrase of
"the chartered rights of men,"
is full, of affectation; and very unusual in the discussion of privileges conferred by char∣ters of the present description. But it is not dif∣ficult to discover what end that ambiguous mode of expression, so often reiterated, is meant to answer.
The rights of men, that is to say, the natural rights of mankind, are indeed sacred things; and if any public measure is proved mischievously to affect them, the objection ought to be fatal to that
descriptionPage 6
measure, even if no charter at all could be set up a∣gainst it. If these natural rights are further affirm∣ed and declared by express covenants, if they are clearly defined and secured against chicane, against power, and authority, by written instruments and positive engagements, they are in a still better condition: they partake not only of the sanctity of the object so secured, but of that solemn pub∣lic faith itself, which secures an object of such importance. Indeed this formal recognition, by the sovereign power, of an original right in the subject, can never be subverted, but by rooting up the holding radical principles of government, and even of society itself. The charters, which we call by distinction great, are public instruments of this nature; I mean the charters of King John and King Henry the Third. The things secured by these instruments may, without any deceitful ambiguity, be very fitly called the chartered rights of men.
These charters have made the very name of a charter dear to the heart of every Englishman—But, Sir, there may be, and there are charters, not only different in nature, but formed on principles the very reverse of those of the great charter. Of this kind is the charter of the East India Company. Magna charta is a charter to restrain power, and to destroy monopoly. The East India charter is a charter to establish monopoly, and to create power. Political power and commercial mono∣poly are not the rights of men; and the rights to them derived from charters, it is fallacious and sophistical to call
"the chartered rights of men."
These chartered rights, (to speak of such char∣ters and of their effects in terms of the greatest
descriptionPage 7
possible moderation) do at least suspend the natural rights of mankind at large; and in their very frame and constitution are liable to fall into a direct violation of them.
By these means, in the course of not more than four or five years, this once opulent and flourish∣ing country, which, by the accounts given in the Bengal consultations, yielded more than three crore of Sicca rupees, that is, above three millions ster∣ling, annually, is reduced, as far as I can discover, in a matter purposely involved in the utmost per∣plexity, to less than one million three hundred thousand pounds, and that exacted by every mode of rigour that can be devised. To complete the business, most of the wretched remnants of this revenue are mortgaged, and delivered into the hands of the usurers at Benares (for there alone are to be found some lingering remains of the an∣cient wealth of these regions) at an interest of near thirty per cent. per annum.
The revenues in this manner failing, they seized upon the estates of every person of emi∣nence in the country, and, under the name of resumption, confiscated their property. I wish, Sir, to be understood universally and literally, when I assert, that there is not left one man of property and substance for his rank, in the whole of these provinces, in provinces which are nearly the extent of England and Wales taken together. Not one landholder, not one banker, not one merchant, not one even of those who usually perish last, the ultimum moriens in a ruined state, no one farmer of revenue.
The East India Company's activities, particularly the behaviour of the Company's servants, roused much public indignation in England.
Nabobs
There were many sources of public and parliamentary outrage. The Company servants who had become fantastically wealthy through corrupt trade and other practices, became known as nabobs.
It was feared that these individuals, their agents and those who took their bribes, would corrupt Parliament by forming an unbeatable East Indian interest there.
Corruption and brutality
There was also despair at the bad administration of the Company's affairs, both in Britain and in India – especially in 1772 when the Company's finances collapsed. Lord North's Regulating Act of 1773 was a response to this concern.
In addition there was anger at the often brutal and corrupt behaviour of some of the Company's officials.
Attacks in Parliament
Robert Clive, the victor of Plassey, and MP for Shrewsbury from 1761, had to defend himself vigorously for three successive days in the Commons in May 1773 against the attacks levelled against him by General John Burgoyne, MP for Preston, who was the chairman of a committee examining his administration in India.
Edmund Burke (MP for Malton) became the most outspoken critic in Parliament against Company abuse and immorality in India and led a campaign to impeach the former Governor-General Warren Hastings (1773-85) on grounds of misrule and corruption.
Impeachment
Hastings was charged with high crimes and misdemeanors and was impeached in 1787. His trial - the longest impeachment proceedings in Parliament's history - began in Westminster Hall in 1788.
Burke was unrestrained in his denunciations, and violently accused Hastings of being the "captain-general of iniquity", a "spider of Hell" and a "ravenous vulture devouring the carcases of the dead".
Yet despite the passion and forcefulness of Burke's moral outrage, Hastings was acquitted of all charges in April 1795 after his seven-year trial.
Public interest and concern
Both the Clive inquiry and the Hastings impeachment stirred up widespread popular interest and excitement and showed that under the influence of the Evangelical movement there was a growing public feeling that there should be a moral foundation to British rule in the growing Indian empire.
A common theme in Carey’s writing is the limits of international economic association and the necessary of national association,[40] and his best-known policy position was his defense of protective tariffs. He was described by an admirer as “rigid, devoted, and uncompromising” on the issue,[41] and as “a Cato hammering on his one theme.”[21] Critics accused Carey of Anglophobia for his hostility to the system of free trade under the British Empire and British theories of political economy in general.[3]
Consistent with the law of comparative advantage, Carey argued that global centralization implied an international division of labor by which each nation developed only those resources in which it possessed a natural advantage. This system placed despotic power in the hands of those controlling the world’s mediums of exchange; the places where these middlemen congregated became the global marketplace.[40] This theory, he argued, was the basis for the British policy of imperialism and free trade, by which the Empire intended to establish a monopoly on both manufacturing and shipping centered on London, while other nations were resigned to exporting raw materials.[40]
For many years it has been in contemplation to make a canal or rail-road from Havre to Paris, and thence to the Rhine; but it is not yet commenced, although offering greater advantages than almost any other route in Europe. With a capital like Paris and similarly situated, the people of the United States would, before this time, have made some half dozen communications with the ocean, and most probably have reached the Rhine in two or three places. Already there are two communications between the ocean and the western waters completed, and several others are in progress, and likely to be completed sooner than that between the Rhine and the ocean, although the latter would afford facilities of intercourse to a population at least twenty times greater than can benefit by any one of the others. At Am8terdam» capital may often be had at two per cent per annum, but it is not wanted for such purposes, and the bankers find a market for it here at a much higher price than can be obtained at home.
The same causes have prevented the construction (broads or canals in Spain, the consequence of which is, that " all means of transport are dear, and in the neighbourhood of Salamanca it has been known, after a succession of abundant harvests, that the wheat has actually been left to rot upon ike ground, because it would not repay the cost of carriage." — Ed. Rev, VoL LV., 448.
The Economic consequences of President Trump.
Is the Dollar being devalued by stealth. That old trilemma
The video explores the economic impacts of President Trump's policies, discussing dollar devaluation, historical monetary systems, and potential shifts to gold or Bitcoin-backed currencies, alongside global financial dynamics. Detailed Summary for The Economic Consequences of President Trump by Monica
00:00 The video discusses the economic implications of President Trump's policies, focusing on concepts like the currency trilemma and the historical context of monetary policy.
Introduction to the economic consequences of President Trump's actions.}
Explanation of the economic 'trilemma' and its significance in international monetary policy.}
Discussion on the current economic landscape and emerging voices in economic commentary.}
Key takeaways summarizing the complexities and challenges of managing international monetary agreements.}
07:17 This section discusses the potential economic implications of resetting the US dollar's value, its historical dominance, and the challenges associated with transitioning to a gold-backed currency system.
The process of resetting the dollar's value involves determining how many dollars would be backed by each unit of value.}
The historical context of the US dollar's dominance is rooted in its status as the primary reserve currency, influenced by its gold backing until 1971.}
Reverting to a gold-backed dollar could stabilize inflation but may also impose limitations on monetary policy and lead to deflationary pressures.}
A significant devaluation of the petrodollar would require proportional tariff increases to maintain import price levels.}
Keynes' critique of the gold standard highlights the economic challenges and consequences of rigid monetary policies, relevant to current discussions on the dollar's future.}
14:30 The video discusses the economic strategies and consequences of unemployment and wage reductions, particularly in the context of export industries under President Trump's policies.
The potential for a great depression in export markets is introduced, suggesting economic challenges ahead.}
It explains that wage reductions in sheltered industries are necessary for the export industries to lower their prices, indicating a complex relationship between wages and living costs.}
The video outlines a strategy of credit restriction to intentionally increase unemployment in sheltered industries to drive down wages, highlighting the controversial nature of this approach.}
It cautions about the political implications of admitting to deliberate unemployment as a strategy for economic adjustment, emphasizing the need for discretion in public communication.}
The discussion shifts to the banking system and influential figures like George Soros, indicating a broader context of monetary policy and its historical significance.}
21:51 The video discusses the historical context and impact of economic theories, particularly focusing on the role of Douglas and the evolution of banking in Britain.
The death of Douglas and his lasting influence on economic thought.}
The conflict between financial powers and monarchy, leading to the establishment of the Bank of England.}
The significant involvement of Jewish communities in the development of modern banking and stock exchanges.}
The connection between political Zionism and the historical legacy of Oliver Cromwell's Commonwealth.}
Calvin's controversial views on poverty and obedience, reflecting the socio-economic dynamics of the time.}
29:02 The video discusses significant economic policy changes in Britain post-1974, highlighting the abandonment of full employment commitments, the imposition of cash limits on public spending, and the introduction of a voluntary incomes policy amidst rising inflation and economic instability.
The year 1975 marked a shift in economic policies, distinguishing the post-1974 period from earlier approaches.}
The commitment to full employment was abandoned in favor of controlling inflation, signaling a major policy shift.}
Cash limits were imposed on policy programs, restricting funding adjustments for inflation except for Social Security.}
Public spending growth was questioned, with a focus on potential cuts reflecting changing public sentiments.}
A voluntary incomes policy was introduced, acknowledging the need for a decrease in living standards due to rising costs.}
36:17 This segment discusses the economic implications of government actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the risks of overreach by authorities and referencing historical economic crises.
The COVID-19 pandemic is portrayed as a catalyst for extreme governmental power grabs, raising concerns about the long-term effects on society.}
The ruling elite's overextension during the pandemic is suggested to potentially lead to significant losses for those in power.}
Historical references are made to past economic crises, including the return to the gold standard and its implications for economic policy.}
Keynes's rejection of certain economic policies is mentioned, indicating a critical view on traditional economic approaches during crises.}
43:38 The video discusses the complex economic and geopolitical consequences of President Trump's policies, emphasizing the interplay between financial systems, international conflicts, and media narratives.
Explores the influence of neoliberalism, Zionism, and economic structures like the petrodollar, drawing parallels to historical empires.}
Highlights significant recent events that were underreported by the media, suggesting a deliberate masking of information by governments.}
Discusses the geopolitical tensions involving London, Russia, and Syria, and how these events reflect on Trump's presidency.}
Mentions economic jargon and concepts related to financial policies affecting first-time buyers and macroeconomic stability.}
References historical struggles over banking systems in the U.S., linking past financial conflicts to current economic issues.}
50:47 This video discusses various economic aspects related to the UK and its historical financial decisions, referencing key events and figures that have shaped its economy.
Introduction to the economic context of the UK, mentioning influential parties and political figures.}
Exploration of the causes of major economic events, including the Great Recession and their impact on the UK economy.}
Discussion on the Bank of England's historical acts and their significance in shaping monetary policy.}
Overview of the archival resources available for understanding the history of the Bank of England and its economic policies.}
Is the Dollar being devalued by stealth That old trilemma
The video delves into the nuanced economic impacts of currency devaluation, exploring complex political, financial, and societal systems, while critiquing modern monetary policies and their paradoxical outcomes. Detailed Summary for Is the Dollar being devalued by stealth That old trilemma by Monica
00:01 The video discusses the potential stealth devaluation of the dollar and its implications in the context of political and economic dynamics, particularly under President Trump's administration.
The video opens with a question about whether the dollar is being devalued without obvious signs.}
Key political figures are mentioned, indicating a shift in economic ties and leadership roles that may influence the dollar's value.}
The discussion touches on significant political issues such as Brexit and austerity, which are relevant to the economic landscape.}
The strategy of political campaigning is analyzed, emphasizing the importance of connecting policies to party narratives.}
03:26 The discussion revolves around the complexities of understanding paper currency and its implications for trade, highlighting the need for clarity in economic discussions.
The learning process surrounding economics is intricate and often neglected.}
The inquiry aims to clarify the nature and necessity of paper currency for the audience.}
A specific quantity of money is essential for facilitating trade effectively.}
The centralization of the credit system grants significant power to a select group of money lenders.}
Understanding the proportionate quantity of money necessary for trade is crucial for economic stability.}
06:57 The video discusses the complexities of monetary systems, emphasizing the variability of currency and its implications for economic analysis and control mechanisms within society.
Introduction to the concept of state banks and their bureaucratic nature.}
Exploration of historical discussions on value, fluctuating prices, and the inadequacies of using a variable currency as a measure.}
Analysis of the monetary and financial system as a socio-political tool for economic control and its role in tax collection and public goods provision.}
The importance of understanding financial institutions as command and control systems that influence societal dynamics beyond pure economic considerations.}
10:27 The discussion revolves around the principles of taxation and the complexity of economic policies, emphasizing the importance of understanding both economic and political factors in sustaining national success.
Introduction to the principles of tax policy, highlighting the need for sound taxation based on economic understanding.}
The significance of political principles in taxation, suggesting that effective policy requires a comprehensive grasp of these concepts.}
A critique of a previous argument, indicating dissatisfaction with the lack of empirical evidence and the quality of discourse in economic discussions.}
Questioning the effectiveness of import tariffs in relation to currency devaluation, pointing out the complexities in economic policy discussions.}
13:55 The video discusses the complexities of addressing intricate problems and the ideological barriers that hinder effective solutions. It emphasizes the necessity of understanding context and adapting leadership styles to navigate these challenges.
Introduction to the nature of complex problems, highlighting their nonlinear interactions and potential for significant consequences.}
The importance of utilizing super competencies to address complex issues and the dangers of oversimplifying such problems.}
Identification of three ideological obstacles—neoliberalism, managerialism, and elitism—that pose significant threats to societal and ecological stability.}
A preview of the book's content, contrasting the dangers presented by current ideologies with the potential solutions offered by super competent democracies.}
17:24 The video discusses the paradox of modern financial systems, emphasizing how complexity and efficiency in financial instruments have led to new forms of scarcity rather than abundance, ultimately questioning the effectiveness of these systems in addressing societal needs.
Introduction to the complexities in modern finance and its impact on society.}
The irony of creating systems for efficiency that render them ineffective.}
Exploration of how financial innovations have contributed to scarcity instead of abundance.}
Critique of the carbon currency system as a flawed solution to environmental issues.}
Discussion on how scarcity has become a commodity, increasing the value of limited resources.}
A Priori, "The Proof of a Theory is in its reasoning " Ludvig Von Mises. I would propose this title. "Gold Is Money" JP Morgan. Discuss?
[Translation (as “Under the Scalpel – Bastiat’s Intellect Mercilessly Dissected. – PROUDHON’S LAST LETTER. – An Exhaustive Summary of the Whole Discussion. – LONG EXPOSE OF BASTIAT’S BLUNDERS, – Followed by a Left-Handed Eulogy as a Clincher in Conclusion. – BRILLIANT ENDING OF A FAMOUS CONTROVERSY. – The Defender of Capital Laid in His Grave by the Champion of Labor. – INTEREST AND PRINCIPAL. – LETTER TWELVE. – PROUDHON TO BASTIAT. – [TRANSLATED FOR THE IRISH WORLD BY BENJ. R. TUCKER.]”) by Benjamin R. Tucker, in The Irish World and American Industrial Liberator, 11 October 1879.]
Intellectual Mechanics.
[– These] faculties taken together constitute [REASON].
13.6The induction of Plato; the syllogism of Aristotle; the contradiction of the Sophists; the identity of Condillac; the antinomy of Kant and Hegel, – are only various forms of reasoning, special applications of logic, just as the use of steam as a motive power has caused the invention of all kinds of machinery, – locomotives, steamboats, stationary engines, high or low pressure engines, etc., – but which are all dependent upon the same principle, – steam.
13.7All the sciences, without exception, are founded [on] logic; that is, on the exercise of the four [basic] faculties, – perception, comparison, memory, judgment. That is why science is essentially demonstrative: spontaneity, intuition, imagination have no scientific authority. [It is] for this reason too, it is by virtue of their reasoning faculties, that men become capable of communicating their thoughts and of conversing with each: deprive them of perception, comparison, memory, and judgment, and [they] speak successively or all at once, but they [do not] answer or understand each other.
13.8[Now] to apply these laws of the human mind, our common criterion.
As for you, Monsieur Bastiat, who, an economist, mock at metaphysics, of which Political Economy is but the concrete expression; who, a member of the Institute, are unacquainted even with the philosophy of your century; who, the author of a work entitled “Economical Harmonies” probably in opposition to my “Economical Contradictions,” [M. Proudhon is mistaken in his conjecture. Bastiat did not write the Harmonies in opposition to Economic Contradictions, since on 5 June 1845, that is to say, prior to the appearance of the Contradictions, he communicated in a letter to a friend his intention to write Social Harmonies. Let us also recall that Bastiat was solely a corresponding member of the Institute. – OC] have no conception of the harmonies of history, and see in progress only a desolating fatalism; who, an advocate of Capital and Interest, are utterly ignorant of the principles of commercial bookkeeping; who, conceiving finally, through the circumlocutions of a bewildered imagination and on the authority of your authors more than from your own profound conviction, that it is possible to organize, with the pubic funds, a bank giving Credit without Interest, continue nevertheless to protest, in the name of Liberty of Credit, against GRATUITY OF CREDIT, – you are undoubtedly a good and worthy citizen, an honest economist, a conscientious writer, a loyal representative, a faithful Republican, a true friend of the people: but your last words entitle me to tell you, Monsieur Bastiat, that, scientifically, YOU ARE A DEAD MAN.
[Ironically, Bastiat would in fact be dead by the end of the year. – RTL]
P. J. PROUDHON.
Bernard Lietaers fable of the 11th round adresses this question, I have wondered why Steve Keen and others seem so keen to pooh pooh this as a naive urban myth. Usury is the Price of money, it is the metric of Economists, the high priests of Economics Woo. What we see in Keen and Varafoukis is really at best a controlled opposition clinging to the social control mechanism that is debt based money. They all do it. Prouhdon scotched the artifice in his dialogue with bastiat, and also as described by Kropotkin.
Story of the 11th Round.
Once upon a time, in a small village in the Outback, people used barter for all their transactions. On every market day, people walked around with chickens, eggs, hams, and breads, and engaged in prolonged negotiations among themselves to exchange what they needed. At key periods of the year, like harvests or whenever someone's barn needed big repairs after a storm, people recalled the tradition of helping each other out that they had brought from the old country. They knew that if they had a problem someday, others would aid them in return.
One market day, a stranger with shiny black shoes and an elegant white hat came by and observed the whole process with a sardonic smile. When he saw one farmer running around to corral the six chickens he wanted to exchange for a big ham, he could not refrain from laughing. "Poor people," he said, "so primitive." The farmer's wife overheard him and challenged the stranger, "Do you think you can do a better job handling chickens?" "Chickens, no," responded the stranger, "But there is a much better way to eliminate all that hassle." "Oh yes, how so?" asked the woman. "See that tree there?" the stranger replied. "Well, I will go wait there for one of you to bring me one large cowhide. Then have every family visit me. I'll explain the better way."
And so it happened. He took the cowhide, and cut perfect leather rounds in it, and put an elaborate and graceful little stamp on each round. Then he gave to each family 10 rounds, and explained that each represented the value of one chicken. "Now you can trade and bargain with the rounds instead of the unwieldy chickens," he explained.
It made sense. Everybody was impressed with the man with the shiny shoes and inspiring hat.
"Oh, by the way," he added after every family had received their 10 rounds, "in a year's time, I will come back and sit under that same tree. I want you to each bring me back 11 rounds. That 11th round is a token of appreciation for the technological improvement I just made possible in your lives." "But where will the 11th round come from?" asked the farmer with the six chickens. "You'll see," said the man with a reassuring smile.
Assuming that the population and its annual production remain exactly the same during that next year, what do you think had to happen? Remember, that 11th round was never created. Therefore, bottom line, one of each 11 families will have to lose all its rounds, even if everybody managed their affairs well, in order to provide the 11th round to 10 others.
So when a storm threatened the crop of one of the families, people became less generous with their time to help bring it in before disaster struck. While it was much more convenient to exchange the rounds instead of the chickens on market days, the new game also had the unintended side effect of actively discouraging the spontaneous cooperation that was traditional in the village. Instead, the new money game was generating a systemic undertow of competition among all the participants.
This parable begins to show how competition, insecurity, and greed are woven into our economy because of interest. They can never be eliminated as long as the necessities of life are denominated in interest-money. But let us continue the story now to show how interest also creates an endless pressure for perpetual economic growth.
There are three primary ways Lietaer's story could end: default, growth in the money supply, or redistribution of wealth. One of each eleven families could go bankrupt and surrender their farms to the man in the hat (the banker), or he could procure another cowhide and make more currency, or the villagers could tar-and-feather the banker and refuse to repay the rounds. The same choices face any economy based on usury.
So imagine now that the villagers gather round the man in the hat and say, "Sir, could you please give us some additional rounds so that none of us need go bankrupt?"
The man says, "I will, but only to those who can assure me they will pay me back. Since each round is worth one chicken, I'll lend new rounds to people who have more chickens than the number of rounds they already owe me. That way, if they don't pay back the rounds, I can seize their chickens instead. Oh, and because I'm such a nice guy, I'll even create new rounds for people who don't have additional chickens right now, if they can persuade me that they will breed more chickens in the future. So show me your business plan! Show me that you are trustworthy (one villager can create 'credit reports' to help you do that). I'll lend at 10 percent-if you are a clever breeder, you can increase your flock by 20 percent per year, pay me back, and get rich yourself, too."
The villagers ask, "That sounds OK, but since you are creating the new rounds at 10 percent interest also, there still won't be enough to pay you back in the end."
"That won't be a problem," says the man. "You see, when that time arrives, I will have created even more rounds, and when those come due, I'll create yet more. I will always be willing to lend new rounds into existence. Of course, you'll have to produce more chickens, but as long as you keep increasing chicken production, there will never be a problem."
A child comes up to him and says, "Excuse me, sir, my family is sick, and we don't have enough rounds to buy food. Can you issue some new rounds to me?"
"I'm sorry," says the man, "but I cannot do that. You see, I only create rounds for those who are going to pay me back. Now, if your family has some chickens to pledge as collateral, or if you can prove you are able to work a little harder to breed more chickens, then I will be happy to give you the rounds."
With a few unfortunate exceptions, the system worked fine for a while. The villagers grew their flocks fast enough to obtain the additional rounds they needed to pay back the man in the hat. Some, for whatever reason-ill fortune or ineptitude-did indeed go bankrupt, and their more fortunate, more efficient neighbors took over their farms and hired them as labor. Overall, though, the flocks grew at 10 percent a year along with the money supply. The village and its flocks had grown so large that the man in the hat was joined by many others like him, all busily cutting out new rounds and issuing them to anyone with a good plan to breed more chickens.
From time to time, problems arose. For one, it became apparent that no one really needed all those chickens. "We're getting sick of eggs," the children complained. "Every room in the house has a feather bed now," complained the housewives. In order to keep consumption of chicken products growing, the villagers invented all kinds of devices. It became fashionable to buy a new feather mattress every month, and bigger houses to keep them in, and to have yards and yards full of chickens. Disputes arose with other villages that were settled with huge egg-throwing battles. "We must create demand for more chickens!" shouted the mayor, who was the brother-in-law of the man in the hat. "That way we will all continue to grow rich."
One day, a village old-timer noticed another problem. Whereas the fields around the village had once been green and fertile, now they were brown and foul. All the vegetation had been stripped away to plant grain to feed the chickens. The ponds and streams, once full of fish, were now cesspools of stinking manure. She said, "This has to stop! If we keep expanding our flocks, we will soon drown in chicken shit!"
The man in the hat pulled her aside and, in reassuring tones, told her, "Don't worry, there is another village down the road with plenty of fertile fields. The men of our village are planning to farm out chicken production to them. And if they don't agree well, we outnumber them. Anyway, you can't be serious about ending growth. Why, how would your neighbors pay off their debts? How would I be able to create new rounds? Even I would go bankrupt."
And so, one by one, all the villages turned to stinking cesspools surrounding enormous flocks of chickens that no one really needed, and the villages fought each other for the few remaining green spaces that could support a few more years of growth. Yet despite their best efforts to maintain growth, its pace began to slow. As growth slowed, debt began to rise in proportion to income, until many people spent all their available rounds just paying off the man in the hat. Many went bankrupt and had to work at subsistence wages for employers who themselves could barely meet their obligations to the man in the hat. There were fewer and fewer people who could afford to buy chicken products, making it even harder to maintain demand and growth. Amid an environment-wrecking superabundance of chickens, more and more people had barely enough on which to live, leading to the paradox of scarcity amidst abundance.
This story was written by Bernard Lietaer in his book "The Future of Money". The story illustrates how interest bearing currency in a monetary system forces artificial competition amongst its users beyond what would naturally occur.
We can learn a lot from the Swiss referendum on Citizens Income as discussed here. ´However, the nearly universal misunderstanding of money is a major obstacle. For too long we’ve allowed a small coterie of bankers and “court economists” to hold the secrets and “tutor” us. So, it’s time for total openness. First, regarding the claim that the Swiss proposal would’ve been too costly, what’s entirely omitted from the discussion is that the proposal (and similar proposals elsewhere) appear to call for re-distribution of existing money—taking money from certain sectors through taxation and re-allocating it to the people at-large. The implication is that the money supply is basically static and that re-distributing limited funds would require tough budget decisions—sparking tax hikes and associated spending increases in several areas; hence the claim “costs too much.” But a successful basic-income plan can and must be based on the creation of new money, or “distributism,” not on reshuffling existing money, which is “re-distributism.” That’s the “state secret” that no one wants to touch. The issuance of new money needs to happen to overcome the huge “gap” between today’s paltry purchasing power and the massive mountain of debt and the towering totality of prices on all available goods and services. We have full stores and empty wallets. (Ideally and importantly, governments should reclaim their interest-free money-creation rights and forbid private central banks from creating money any longer).´´
This is for me the nub of the matter something I have in common with Joseph Prouhdon, explained by Peter Kropotkin in the Encyclopedia Britannica thus.
https://archive.org/stream/… ”Now Proudhon advocated a society without government, and used the word Anarchy to describe it. Proudhon repudiated, as is known, all schemes of Communism, according to which mankind would be driven into communistic monasteries or barracks, as also all the schemes of state or state-aided Socialism which were advocated by Louis Blanc and the Collectivists. When he proclaimed in his first memoir on property that ” Property is theft,” he meant only property in its present, Roman-law, sense of ” right of use and abuse ” ; in property-rights, on the other hand, understood in the limited sense of possession, he saw the best protection against the encroachments of the state. At the same time he did not want violently to dispossess the present owners of land, dwelling-houses, mines, factories and so on. He preferred to attain the same end by rendering capital incapable of earning interest; and this he proposed to obtain by means of a national bank, based on the mutual confidence of all those who are engaged in production, who would agree to exchange among themselves their produces at cost-value, by means of labour cheques representing the hours of labour required to produce every given commodity. Under such a system, which Proudhon described as ” Mutuellisme,” all the exchanges of services would be strictly equivalent. Besides, such a bank would be enabled to lend money without interest, levying only something like 1 %, or even less, for covering the cost of administration. Every one being thus enabled to borrow the money that would be required to buy a house, nobody would agree to pay any more a yearly rent for the use of it. A general ” social liquidation ” would thus be rendered easy, without violent expropriation. The same applied to mines, railways, factories and so on. ”
Kropotkin on Prouhdons “All Property is theft.
Such is, substantially, Socialism’s theory of Capital and Interest.
3.52 Not only do we affirm, in accordance with this theory (which, by the way, we hold in common with the economists) and on the strength of our belief in Industrial development, that such is the tendency and the import of lending at Interest; we even prove, by the destructive results of economy as it is, and by a demonstration of the causes of poverty, that this tendency is necessary, and the annihilation of Usury inevitable. 3.53 In fact, Rent, reward of Capital, Interest on Money, in one word, Usury, constituting, as has been said, an integral part of the price of products, and this Usury not being the same for all, it follows that the price of products, composed as it is of Wages and Interest, cannot be paid by those who have only their Wages, and no Interest to pay it with; so that, by the existence of Usury, Labor is Condemned to Idleness and Capital to Bankruptcy. 3.54 This argument, one of that class which mathematicians call the reductio ad absurdum, showing the organic impossibility of lending at Interest, has been repeated a hundred times by Socialism. Why do not the economists notice it? 3.55 Do you really wish to refute the ideas of Socialism on the question of Interest? Listen, then, to the questions which you must answer: – 3.56 1. Is it true that, though the loaning of Capital, when viewed objectively, is a service which has its value, and which consequently should be paid for, this loaning, when viewed subjectively, does not involve an actual sacrifice on the part of the Capitalist; and consequently that it does not establish the right to set a price on it? 3.57 2. Is it true that Usury, to be unobjectionable, must be equal; that the tendency of Society is towards this equalization; so that Usury will be entirely legitimate only when it has become equal for all, – that is, nonexistent? 3.58 3. Is it true that a National Bank, giving Credit and Discount gratis, is a possible institution? 3.59 4. Is it true that the effects of the gratuity of Credit and Discount, as well as that of Taxation when simplified and restored to its true form, would be the abolition of Rent of Real Estate, as well as of Interest on Money? 3.60 5. Is it true that the old system is a contradiction and a mathematical impossibility? 3.61 6. Is it true that Political Economy, after having, for several thousand years, opposed the view of Usury held by theology, philosophy, and legislation, comes, by the application of its own principles, to the same conclusion? 3.62 7. Is it true, finally, that Usury has been, as a providential institution, simply an instrument of equality and progress, just as, in the Political sphere, absolute monarchy was an instrument of liberty and progress, and as, in the Judicial sphere, the boiling-water test, the duel, and the rack were, in their turn, instruments of conviction and progress? 3.63 These are the points that our opponents are bound to examine before charging us with scientific and intellectual weakness; these, Monsieur Bastiat, are the points on which your future arguments must turn, if you wish them to produce a definite result. The question is stated clearly and categorically: permit us to believe that, after having examined it, you will perceive that there is something in the Socialism of the nineteenth century that is beyond the reach of your antiquated Political Economy. P. J. PROUDHON. Quite ! Marxists.org Steve Keen tried this already in his Forbes article the reality held up against Keens own beautiful theory is amply scothced in the comments in Forbes
Magazine not least the comments from one Damon Vrable.
Contents Introduction 1. Financial Deregulation 2. Credit money creation by banks and building societies 3. The Quantity Theory of Credit 4. Central Bank Policies to Manage the 2007 Financial Crisis 4.1 Should the Bank of England reduce interest rates in response to this type of financial crisis? 4.2 What type of quantitative easing is appropriate? Bibliography Footnotes https://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/archive/starkey_banking2
SYNOPSIS:
James Surowiecki writes fine columns, and this one is no exception. But he's got the story of the effects of the Black Death on serfdom backwards. He - and anyone else curious about history - should read Evsey Domar's classic 1970 paper "The causes of slavery or serfdom: a hypothesis." (Sorry, doesn't seem to be available online.)
Here's what Surowiecki says: "The Black Death helped undermine feudalism. The population decline was so severe that the individual’s labor grew more valuable, which enabled serfs to abandon their lords and become tenant farmers or urban workers. " That sounds plausible, but it's not the way it happened. According to Domar, serfdom actually withered away before the Black Death, as European population grew close to its Malthusian limit. The puzzle is why serfdom wasn't reinstituted after the Black Death.
Domar was motivated by his knowledge of Russian history. Serfdom in Russia, he knew, wasn't an institution that dated back to the Dark Ages. Instead, it was mainly a 16th-century creation, contemporaneous with the beginning of the great Russian expansion into the steppes. Why?
He came up with a simple yet powerful insight: there's no point in enslaving or enserfing a man unless the wage you would have to pay him if he was free is substantially above the cost of feeding, housing, and clothing him.
Imagine a pre-industrial society where population is pressing on limited land supplies, and the marginal product of labor - and hence the real wage rate under competitive conditions - is barely at subsistence. In that case, why bother establishing property rights in human beings? It costs no more to hire a free worker than to feed an indentured laborer. Indeed, by 1300 - with Europe very much a Malthusian society - serfdom had withered away from lack of interest.
But now suppose that for some reason land becomes abundant, and labor scarce. Then competition among landowners will tend to push up wages of free workers, and the ruling class will try, if it can, to pin peasants down and prevent them from bargaining for a higher standard of living. In Russia, it was all about gunpowder: suddenly steppe nomads were no longer so formidable, and the rich lands of the Ukraine were open for settlement. Serfdom was an effort to keep peasants from taking advantage of this situation. (And if I've got it right, those who were venturesome enough to run away and set up outside the system became Cossacks.)
Meanwhile, the New World opened in the west. Sure enough, the colonizing powers tried various forms of indentured servitude - making serfs of the Indians in Spanish territories, bringing over indentured servants in Virginia. But eventually they hit on a better solution, from their point of view: importing slaves from Africa.
Here's the puzzle. In Europe circa 1100, with population scarce, serfdom was useful to the ruling class. By 1300 it wasn't, and had been allowed to drift away. But after 1348 it should have been worthwhile again. Yet it wasn't effectively reimposed. There were attempts to restrain wages and limit labor mobility, as well as attempts to tax the peasants (Wat Tyler's rebellion fits into all this.) But all-out feudalism didn't return. Why?
And an even bigger question: why hasn't indentured servitude made a comeback in the modern era? Yes, I know, human rights and all that - but if it was profitable to have indentured servants in the modern world, I'm sure that Richard Scaife's think tanks would have no trouble finding justifications, and assorted Christian groups would explain why it's God's will.
Anyway, have to get back to real work. But try to find a copy of Domar's paper and read it.
Originally published on the Official Paul Krugman Page, 5.8.03
Will (Matt Damon): “Of course that’s your contention. You’re a first year grad student. You just got finished readin’ some Marxian historian — Pete Garrison probably. You’re gonna be convinced of that ’til next month when you get to James Lemon, and then you’re gonna be talkin’ about how the economies of Virginia and Pennsylvania were entrepreneurial and capitalist way back in 1740. That’s gonna last until next year — you’re gonna be in here regurgitating Gordon Wood, talkin’ about, you know, the Pre-Revolutionary utopia and the capital-forming effects of military mobilization… Wood drastically — Wood drastically underestimates the impact of social distinctions predicated upon wealth, especially inherited wealth.’ got that from Vickers, ‘Work in Essex County,’ page 98, right? Yeah, I read tYouhat too. Were you gonna plagiarize the whole thing for us? Do you have any thoughts of your own on this matter? Or do you…is that your thing? You come into a bar. You read some obscure passage and then pretend…you pawn it off as your own idea just to impress some girls and embarrass my friend? See, the sad thing about a guy like you is in 50 years you’re gonna start doin’ some thinkin’ on your own and you’re gonna come up with the fact that there are two certainties in life. One: don’t do that. And two: You dropped a hundred and fifty grand on a f—-n’ education you coulda’ got for a dollar fifty in late charges at the public library.”
Howard Zinn (August 24, 1922 – January 27, 2010) was an Americanhistorian, playwright, and socialist thinker. He was chair of the history and social sciences department at Spelman College,[1] and a political science professor at Boston University. Zinn wrote over 20 books, including his best-selling and influential A People’s History of the United States. In 2007, he published a version of it for younger readers, A Young People’s History of the United States.[2]
After two years as a post-doctoral fellow in Williamsburg, Virginia, and a year teaching at the University of Wyoming in Laramie, Vickers was appointed to a permanent position at Memorial University in 1984. The family flourished in Newfoundland, but in early 1999 Vickers was diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma. The high reputation of the doctors at the University of California, Dan Diego was a factor in Vickers accepting an offer to join the UCSD History Department later that year.
By this time Vickers was well known to historians throughout the States. His award-winning 1994 book Farmers and Fishermen: Two Centuries of Work in Essex Country, Massachusetts, 1630-1830, had delineated through painstaking analysis of archival records of entire communities the extent to which the development of New England had depended on labor that was largely unfree—with workers held in check not by slavery but by onerous burdens of debt. It had been hailed by reviewers as “one of the best works yet written on the early American economy” and as a book that explained “the deepest inner workings of New England society.”
had delineated through painstaking analysis of archival records of entire communities the extent to which the development of New England had depended on labor that was largely unfree—with workers held in check not by slavery but by onerous burdens of debt
Follow the debt in the Bailouts!
The International - banking scene
A tense discussion reveals a bank's sinister strategy to control global conflicts by profiting from debt rather than weapon sales, exposing the dark essence of the banking industry. Detailed Summary for The International - banking scene by Monica
00:00 The video discusses a banking scenario involving the IBBC's significant investments in missile technology, emphasizing the strategic importance of these transactions in global arms trade.
Introduction to the inquiry about the IBBC's financial activities.}
The IBBC has previously made substantial purchases of missiles from China.}
Discussion on the rationale behind the bank's large investments in missile sales.}
The strategy to establish the IBBC as the exclusive broker for Chinese small arms in the third world.}
01:18 The discussion revolves around the financial motives behind weapon sales and the underlying control of debt that conflicts generate, emphasizing the banking industry's role in perpetuating this cycle.
Billions are invested in the banking scene, raising questions about profitability.}
The primary focus is on controlling the flow of weapons and the conflicts they create.}
The true value of conflict lies in the debt it generates, which is what banks aim to control.}
Controlling debt is seen as a means to exert influence over nations and individuals alike.}
A personal anecdote reflects distrust in the banking system and its impact on relationships.}
WOMEN FOR AMERICA...FOR THE WORLD
EON is pleased and honored to play on-line host to the Academy Award winning documentary WOMEN -- FOR AMERICA, FOR THE WORLD. Leading American women speak out about the dangers posed by nuclear weapons and call for a new vision of security based on affirming life rather than destroying it. With the specter of nuclear weapons proliferation looming even larger today, and with the moribund nuclear power industry attempting to 're-brand' itself as a 'clean energy' solution to global climate change, this clear-headed film is as relevant today as when it won the prestigious prize in 1986.
The video highlights the emotional and urgent plea of women advocating for peace, disarmament, and a better future, emphasizing the interconnectedness of humanity, the impact of nuclear threats, and the power of collective action to drive societal change. Detailed Summary for WOMEN FOR AMERICA...FOR THE WORLD by Monica
00:00 The video emphasizes the importance of women's voices in addressing global challenges and fostering hope for a better future. It showcases personal reflections on motherhood and the responsibility to advocate for peace and humanity.
Introduction with music sets a hopeful tone for the message to follow.}
Women are portrayed as messengers of hope, encouraging active participation in reducing human suffering and political tensions.}
A personal story highlights the emotional struggles of motherhood amid global threats, questioning the future for children.}
The speaker discusses the deep connection between women and the nation, emphasizing their role in nurturing and shaping the future.}
The video concludes with a reflection on the fragility of peace and the potential consequences of human actions, urging a collective responsibility.}
04:03 The video addresses the devastating impacts of nuclear power and weapons on communities and emphasizes the need for collective action to protect future generations.
Discussion of the origins and consequences of nuclear power, including health issues faced by miners.}
Emphasis on the emotional toll on families, particularly children, who are affected by the dangers of nuclear power.}
Recognition of the shared suffering across different communities, highlighting the interconnectedness of humanity.}
Personal reflection on visiting Hiroshima and the moral responsibility to prevent future nuclear tragedies.}
08:05 The video discusses the alarming proliferation of nuclear weapons, the implications for global security, and the staggering military expenditures that overshadow pressing humanitarian needs.
The U.S. is developing missile technology to counter Soviet defenses, indicating a dangerous arms race.}
The discussion highlights the sheer number of nuclear weapons and their potential to cause catastrophic destruction.}
The extensive nuclear capabilities are argued to increase the likelihood of nuclear conflict rather than deter it.}
The video reveals the enormous financial commitment to military spending, which raises concerns about priorities in national budgeting.}
It emphasizes the contrast between military expenditures and the urgent humanitarian needs faced by millions globally.}
12:11 The video discusses the importance of promoting democracy and addressing fundamental human issues such as hunger and disease rather than focusing solely on military competition against the Soviet Union. It emphasizes the shared humanity between people and the need for a more compassionate approach to international relations.
The speaker warns against normalizing dire situations and stresses the need for innovative methods to promote democracy in developing countries.}
The speaker highlights America's role as a beacon of hope for economic progress in a world plagued by poverty and the threat of mass destruction.}
A personal experience with Soviet women reveals their deep-seated fears of war, emphasizing the common fears shared by people regardless of nationality.}
The speaker criticizes the prioritization of military spending over essential social services that enhance quality of life, advocating for a focus on education and community well-being.}
16:16 The speaker reflects on the importance of emotional engagement in advocating for environmental issues, emphasizing the need for awareness and participation in shaping the future.
The speaker initially felt unprepared to speak out about environmental issues but has since gained knowledge and awareness.}
They express a realization about the responsibility for the planet's future lying in the hands of families and individuals, highlighting the consequences of silence and inaction.}
The speaker addresses the common perception among women that emotional responses to environmental destruction should be overcome, arguing instead that such emotions can be a source of strength.}
Fear can motivate action towards making a difference in national policy, challenging the notion that change is impossible.}
Despite feelings of discouragement and hopelessness, the speaker remains committed to advocating for change, questioning who may still be unreachable in the conversation about environmental issues.}
20:21 The video discusses the importance of change in society, emphasizing that individuals must have the courage to challenge the status quo and advocate for transformation, particularly in the context of political engagement and nuclear disarmament.
Change is often met with controversy, especially from those benefiting from the existing system.}
Personal stories of overcoming adversity highlight the potential for change, as demonstrated by the speaker's successful election campaign against the odds.}
The power of collective action is illustrated through historical examples, showing how public pressure can lead to significant governmental change.}
Acknowledging past tragedies, such as Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is crucial for motivating societal change and understanding the need for disarmament.}
Fundamental personal change is necessary for societal transformation, emphasizing shared responsibility among all individuals on the planet.}
24:25 The video emphasizes the journey of self-discovery and the broader impact of individual lives on the world, highlighting themes of personal growth, sacrifice, and a sense of community beyond one's immediate family.
Self-discovery and personal identity are shaped by experiences.}
Emphasizes the capacity for deep feelings and sacrifices.}
Living a life of dignity and consequence enhances personal fulfillment.}
Life's purpose expands beyond personal interests to a larger community.}
The concept of family is redefined to include all children globally.}
What About Money? Bernard Lietaer interviewed by Lars Schall
21 Aug 2012
Lars Schall meets Bernard Lietaer: In this exclusive video interview, the internationally renowned currency expert Lietaer, who has worked in many different functions in the world of money, advocates an upgrade of our monetary paradigm as a systemic solution to our global financial crisis. The monopoly of a single currency in favor of the banking system must be eradicated. Diversity must substitute monoculture.
Bernard Lietaer discusses the evolution and flaws of monetary systems, emphasizing the societal impacts of single currencies, the need for diverse tools like the proposed "Terra" currency, and how money influences human behavior and global stability. Detailed Summary for What About Money? Bernard Lietaer interviewed by Lars Schall by Monica
00:16 The video features an interview with Bernard Lietaer, an expert in currency systems, discussing the nature of money and its impact on freedom and society.
Introduction to Bernard Lietaer, highlighting his extensive experience in the field of money and currency systems.}
Discussion on the relationship between knowledge of money and personal freedom, questioning the current understanding of monetary systems.}
Emphasis on the importance of being conscious about money, as many people take it for granted, leading to manipulation by existing systems.}
Exploration of the origins and nature of money, suggesting it is tied to agreements and perceptions rather than just economic functions.}
03:54 The discussion focuses on the relationship between conventional money systems and societal structures, particularly patriarchal and matriarchal values. Lietaer emphasizes how different types of currencies reflect underlying societal values and structures.
Lietaer introduces the concept of conventional money and questions the general lack of understanding people have regarding its origins and implications.}
He explores the connection between the concept of a single currency and the development of patriarchal societies throughout history.}
Lietaer contrasts patriarchal monetary systems with matriarchal ones, highlighting how different currencies serve distinct purposes in local versus long-distance trade.}
The conversation concludes with a critique of the current monetary system, describing it as fundamentally flawed, where money is treated as debt rather than a positive resource.}
07:52 In this segment, Bernard Lietaer discusses the limitations and dangers of the current monetary system, emphasizing the need for diversity in currency and alternative solutions to address financial instability.
The current monetary system, while functional within limits, is unsustainable as it leads to exponential growth in a finite world.}
Fractional reserve banking has historically fueled industrial growth, but it now poses risks as we move beyond the industrial age.}
The existing money system promotes short-term thinking and competition, which undermines social capital and stability.}
Historically, crises have prompted the search for new monetary tools, suggesting that it's time to explore alternative solutions to current structural issues.}
The monoculture of national currencies contributes to financial instability, indicating the need for diversity in economic systems.}
11:48 In this segment, Bernard Lietaer discusses the evolution of money from a gold-backed system to fiat currencies, emphasizing the implications for economic systems and central banking.
Lietaer introduces the concept of money being historically backed by gold and questions the implications of this change.}
He reflects on the advantages and limitations of the gold standard, noting its impact on government positions and economic activity.}
The discussion shifts to the current fiat currency system, explaining how fiat allows governments to create money and its philosophical underpinnings.}
15:46 In this segment, Bernard Lietaer discusses the role of central banks in the monetary system, their perceived public purpose versus their actual function, and the historical context of gold in currency systems.
Lietaer explains that central banks are often viewed as public institutions dedicated to the public good, but their true purpose is to maintain the banking system's currency monopoly.}
He emphasizes the necessity of central banks in modern fractional reserve banking systems to ensure stability, but notes that they are not essential for all types of currencies.}
Lietaer shares his views on the gold standard, suggesting that while he does not advocate for a return to it, gold could serve as an alternative currency alongside others.}
He recounts an anecdote about the secrecy surrounding gold reserves at the Bank of England, highlighting the lack of transparency in central banking practices.}
Finally, he discusses the competition between different forms of money, such as the dollar and gold, and how fluctuations in gold prices can indicate broader economic competition.}
19:42 In this segment, Bernard Lietaer discusses the potential failure of the US dollar, the challenges facing the Euro, and the need for alternative currencies that reflect democratic input.
Lietaer suggests that there are signs of manipulation in the US dollar, indicating its potential failure is inevitable.}
He expresses concern about the lack of a backup plan for the US dollar, predicting a difficult transition when it eventually fails.}
Lietaer acknowledges the Euro as a stabilizing force for the European Union but questions the governance surrounding it.}
He doubts the future of the Euro in its current form, suggesting it needs to evolve to survive.}
Lietaer emphasizes the need for complementary currencies that can represent democratic choices, which are currently overlooked.}
23:40 In this segment, Bernard Lietaer discusses the concept of a global currency, referred to as 'terror', which aims to provide stability and promote long-term thinking in economic practices.
Introduction of a new global currency concept that is detached from any nation-state.}
The proposed currency would be backed by a basket of essential commodities, ensuring stability against economic shocks.}
Lietaer emphasizes the need for a currency that incentivizes long-term thinking, crucial for sustainable development.}
He reflects on the philosophical implications of money, suggesting it drives negative human behaviors such as greed and short-termism.}
Lietaer concludes that money is a primary tool of power, influencing organizations and their decisions.}
Roger G LewisJuly 16, 2017 at 11:15 “Banks borrow money short-term at low interest and lend long at marginally higher rates. It may sound precarious, but it is how they earn their living. In the conventional model, however, the short-term funding comes from deposits, from ordinary savers. Ordinarily, in a well-run bank, their withdrawals and deposits tend to cancel each other out. Fits of uncertainty and mass withdrawals are always possible, and perhaps even inevitable once in a while. So to prevent them turning into bank runs, governments offer guarantees up to a reasonable amount. Most of the Northern Rock depositors had little to fear. Their deposits were, like all other ordinary savers, guaranteed by then Chancellor Alistair Darling. The investors who weren’t covered by government backing were those who had provided Northern Rock with funding through a new and different channel—the wholesale money market. They had tens of billions at stake, and every reason to panic. It was the sudden withdrawal of this funding that actually killed Northern Rock.As well as taking in money from savers, banks can also borrow from other banks and other institutional investors. The money markets offer funds overnight, or for a matter of weeks or months. It is a fiercely competitive market with financial professionals on both sides of every trade. Margins are slim, but if the volumes are large there are profits to be made. For generations, this was the preserve of investment bankers—the ultimate insiders of the financial community. They didn’t bother with savers’ deposits. They borrowed in the money markets. From the 1990s commercial banks and mortgage lenders began to operate on a similar model. It was this new form of “market-based” banking combined with the famous securitisation of mortgages that enabled the huge expansion of European and US banking that began to crash in 2007.“
This aspect of the Article is completely flawed. Banks Create money by originating debt, that is by finding people who will sign debt contracts in return for offering security. The Bail Out funds Post 2008 and QE are based upon re defining the security or quality of the Security offered in support of those debt contracts. The commercial Banks moved their own goal posts with the full cooperation of the Central Banks and the Treasury departments of various Washington Consensus Governments, Chiefly The ECB, The Fed, Bank of England, Bank of Japan. with the Chinese and Russian Central Banks Going out in the cold and forming the BRICS Development Bank seeking to Head of a UNI Polar Dollar based World at the pass.The Accounting takes place after this initial money creation and the complex system of Central Bank Clearing is really a framework of Mexican standoffs where each player realises that they must not cross the others in a code of honour amongst thieves with of course Wall street and the dollar being first amongst equals?Without getting to the bottom of Bank Created Debt Based Money article such as these Let off the hook those they claim to be holding to account.
I also noticed that Varafoukis posted the review of his latest book by Tooze. It seems both Tooze and Varafoukis are similarly in need of a sharp talking to from Prof. Lietaer. Steve Keen is a Freind of Varafoukis and again has a strange aversion to talking about Usury as other priests of the Heterodox monetary school also have. I´m going back to Read some Kreutz, these elite sophists all stick together, Always Jam tomorrow, said, Alice?
Crony Capitalist Virus 2020 , Truth to Power. Brexit, Globalism, Feudalism, Green New Deal, the Epidemic of Bullshit Unravelled. @davidgraeber @financialeyes @JoeBlob20 #DebtBomb @DominicFrisby #Life on the Farm, #TwoLegsGood From 1984 to Animal Farm. Thinning the Herd and the Inanition of Stock. Boris’s Technocratic Dystopia, Singapore on Thames #WrongKindofGreen #WaroftheWorlds
Emperors New Clothes H C Anderson told by Russel Brand
An emperor obsessed with clothes is deceived by two cheats who pretend to make invisible garments, leading to a public revelation by a child that he is wearing nothing at all. Detailed Summary for Emperors New CLothes H C Anderson told by Russel Brand by Monica
00:01 The story begins with an emperor who is obsessed with fashion and spends all his wealth on clothes, leading to a deception by two con artists.
Introduction of the emperor who has a strong passion for beautiful clothing.}
The arrival of two deceitful weavers who convince the emperor of their ability to create invisible clothes.}
The emperor is fooled into believing he must pay handsomely for these 'magical' garments, which they never actually create.}
Despite the lack of real cloth, everyone pretends to admire the nonexistent garments, showcasing the theme of deception.}
00:50 The story depicts the Emperor's vain pursuit of fashion, leading to a public revelation of his lack of clothing, highlighting themes of deception and honesty.
The weaver and tailor are busy pretending to create the Emperor's new clothes.}
The Emperor, upon wearing the new clothes, believes they are so light that he feels as if he has nothing on.}
During the procession, everyone pretends to see the clothes until a child innocently points out the truth.}
The narrative leaves unanswered questions about the consequences of the Emperor's actions.}
Looking at Serfdom there is a link to the excellent Wikipedia article to Brad De Longs Blog, he is I see from Wikipedia reckoned to be the 754th most influential economist in the World, He is a Professor at Berkely, where no less than two of my Former Business Partners are also Tenured Professors, also in The Economics Priesthood. According to Wikipedia, he is a self-proclaimed Neo Liberal? ( wikipedia J. Bradford DeLong ) , served under Clintons Economics chief Summers and whilst he seems a thoroughly nice and well meaning chap he has no Clue, certainly no wish to draw any attention to having any clue as to Money Creation, more precisely endogenous money creation.
May 10, 2003 The Causes of Slavery or Serfdom: A Hypothesis Paul Krugman’s post, Serfs Up!, reminds me of one of my major sins this spring (for which I must atone): my cutting Evsey Domar (1970), “The Causes of Slavery or Serfdom: A Hypothesis,” Economic History Review 30:1 (March), pp. 18-32, from my spring 2003 Economics 210a reading list. As Krugman summarizes Domar’s main point: Domar was motivated by his knowledge of Russian history. Serfdom in Russia, he knew, wasn’t an institution that dated back to the Dark Ages. Instead, it was mainly a 16th-century creation, contemporaneous with the beginning of the great Russian expansion into the steppes. Why? He came up with a simple yet powerful insight: there’s no point in enslaving or enserfing a man unless the wage you would have to pay him if he was free is substantially above the cost of feeding, housing, and clothing him. Imagine a pre-industrial society where population is pressing on limited land supplies, and the marginal product of labor – and hence the real wage rate under competitive conditions – is barely at subsistence. In that case, why bother establishing property rights in human beings? It costs no more to hire a free worker than to feed an indentured laborer. Indeed, by 1300 – with Europe very much a Malthusian society – serfdom had withered away from lack of interest. But now suppose that for some reason land becomes abundant, and labor scarce. Then competition among landowners will tend to push up wages of free workers, and the ruling class will try, if it can, to pin peasants down and prevent them from bargaining for a higher standard of living. In Russia, it was all about gunpowder: suddenly steppe nomads were no longer so formidable, and the rich lands of the Ukraine were open for settlement. Serfdom was an effort to keep peasants from taking advantage of this situation. (And if I’ve got it right, those who were venturesome enough to run away and set up outside the system became Cossacks.) Meanwhile, the New World opened in the west. Sure enough, the colonizing powers tried various forms of indentured servitude – making serfs of the Indians in Spanish territories, bringing over indentured servants in Virginia. But eventually they hit on a better solution, from their point of view: importing slaves from Africa… Domar’s contribution is truly one of the most effective and powerful pieces of synthetic social science I have ever read. It isn’t perfect. He has more predecessors than he realizes (Marx, for example, especially Marx’s observations on the Swan River Colony in Australia, and the whole section on primitive accumulation and the creation of agrarian capitalism in Britain). And Domar misses one big cause of serfdom and slavery. During the formation of the Roman Empire, in Poland at the end of the Middle Ages, and in the Caribbean islands during the early modern period, slavery and serfdom did not emerge because a high land-labor ratio meant that the ruling elite could not afford to bid for labor in a free labor market. Slavery and serfdom emerged, instead, because high demand for staple products (grain, sugar, tobacco…) greatly lowered the gap between the productivity of free and the productivity of bound workers. Staple production is easier for gang-bosses to monitor than more diversified farming. Staple production also has lower skill requirements for workers. When demand for staple products is very high–to feed the proletariat of imperial Rome, to feed the growing cities of late-Medieval Flanders, or to supply the cheap luxuries demanded by early modern England–slavery or serfdom can emerge even without an extraordinarily high land/labor ratio.
The song urges England to unite beyond political divides, awaken from nostalgia, and confront impending challenges with urgency. Detailed Summary for MADDY PRIOR wake up england by Monica
00:00 The video emphasizes the urgent need for unity and awareness among the people of England in the face of impending challenges, urging them to move beyond their fears and past grievances.
The speaker addresses concerns about external threats, suggesting that fear should be set aside.}
A call for unity is made, encouraging people from different political backgrounds to come together.}
The refrain 'wake up England' stresses the importance of recognizing current realities rather than clinging to the past.}
Imagery of impending danger is used to illustrate the urgency of the situation facing England.}
The video concludes with a reminder of the need for change and action, regardless of political affiliation.}
01:38 Maddy Prior's 'Wake Up England' calls for a collective awakening and awareness of the present, urging the audience to move beyond the past and recognize the urgency of current circumstances.
Introduction emphasizing the cultural identity of England and its distinction from Germany.}
A call to action for England to awaken and stop dwelling on historical events.}
A warning about the fast-approaching end times, suggesting a need for immediate awareness.}
Mention of political affiliations, urging those in the middle to also wake up to the reality of the situation.}
Reiteration of the call to wake up, highlighting the importance of alliances like NATO.}
The video discusses the impact of trade policies, outsourcing jobs overseas, and the challenges of unfair competition, emphasizing the need for balanced agreements to protect American jobs. Detailed Summary for Giant Sucking Sound, Dont Get fooled again. #MAGA by Monica
00:00 The speaker addresses the challenges of foreign competition and the impact on American jobs, emphasizing the need for fair trade practices and the consequences of outsourcing.
The speaker questions how the president will promote fair competition for American businesses in foreign markets.}
A significant concern is raised about the loss of jobs to overseas markets, highlighting the need to bring those jobs back to the U.S.}
The speaker discusses the implications of one-way trade agreements and the importance of renegotiating them for better terms.}
A metaphorical 'giant sucking sound' is used to describe the economic impact of outsourcing jobs due to lower labor costs in other countries.}
The speaker mentions efforts to increase exports and addresses the need to negotiate trade agreements that benefit American workers.}
02:04 The speaker discusses the impact of trade agreements on job exports, highlighting the increasing trade deficit with Japan and the overall economic implications.
The Prime Minister of Canada emphasizes the importance of trade agreements.}
He notes that export jobs are increasing significantly.}
The speaker points out the rising exports to Mexico.}
A record high trade deficit with Japan is announced.}
The speaker warns about the financial implications, referring to a 'sucking' sound related to economic losses.}
04:28 The video discusses the metaphorical implications of a 'giant sucking sound,' suggesting that there are concerns about financial losses and doubts regarding economic stability.
The sound represents a return to a previous state or situation, hinting at potential negative consequences.}
There are concerns that money will be drained away, leading to skepticism about financial decisions and their impact.}
07:06 The video discusses the implications of economic changes, emphasizing a significant financial shift that could lead to losses for some while benefiting others.
The discussion starts with the rapid movement of sound, hinting at fast-paced changes.}
A metaphorical 'giant sucking sound' suggests a substantial economic drain or loss.}
The idea of resources or opportunities moving away, indicating a shift in economic power.}
Mention of a gap implies potential disparities or opportunities arising from these changes.}
10:27 The video discusses the misleading nature of certain narratives, emphasizing the importance of critical thinking.
The End of the, "National Debt and a Larger Loaf of Bread". Fixing Money
The video critiques the flawed monetary system built on debt, highlights wealth inequality and systemic issues, and advocates for alternative cooperative financial models promoting fairness and human potential. Detailed Summary for The End of the, "National Debt and a Larger Loaf of Bread". Fixing Money by Monica
00:02 The video discusses critical flaws in the monetary system, emphasizing how money is fundamentally created from debt and the implications of this structure on financial stability.
The speaker intends to reveal hidden truths about the monetary system.}
Key points about the monetary system: all money is created from debt, and if all debts were repaid, there would be no money left in circulation.}
The impossibility of repaying existing debt is highlighted, as the necessary money to cover interest does not exist.}
There is a call to action against the financial system, criticizing the burden placed on Americans due to fraud by private entities.}
02:11 The video discusses the inherent inequalities in the monetary system, highlighting how the financial structure benefits the wealthy at the expense of the poor, and critiques the systemic issues that lead to these disparities.
Introduction to the problem of financial inequity and the reluctance to disclose financial practices.}
Explains how wealth accumulation through interest benefits the rich while the lower class suffers from high-interest loans.}
Describes the systemic theft from the poor to enrich the wealthy as a fundamental aspect of the monetary system.}
Critiques government bailouts of corporations and banks, emphasizing the absurdity of borrowing money from banks to fund these bailouts.}
04:25 The video discusses the implications of sovereign debt and its potential consequences on society, emphasizing the need for alternative economic systems.
Discussion on sovereign debt defaults and the alarming financial situation in the U.S., suggesting drastic tax increases to cover interest.}
Critique of the concept of debt as an abstract notion that negatively impacts billions, leading to societal issues like poverty and unemployment.}
Encouragement to envision a better world, emphasizing creativity and alternatives beyond traditional monetary systems.}
Introduction of a mutual credit system where individuals can balance credits and debits, fostering community support and cooperation.}
06:37 The video discusses the nature of money as a medium of exchange that fosters mutual benefit and cooperation among individuals, contrasting it with traditional scarcity-based monetary systems.
Introduction to the concept of credit and debit functioning without the need for physical cash.}
Explanation of how money is created through mutual exchanges rather than hierarchical systems.}
Discussion on the abundance of currency in cooperative systems leading to a supportive community environment.}
Contrast between scarcity-driven money, which induces fear and greed, and abundant money that promotes generosity and well-being.}
Call to awaken awareness of human potential beyond traditional monetary limitations.}
08:47 The discussion revolves around the complexities and perceived fraud within the financial system, particularly regarding mortgage defaults and bond pricing, revealing a mix of ignorance and manipulation among major financial entities.
Rising mortgage defaults are critiqued, questioning the rationale behind higher bond prices despite the defaults.}
The speaker expresses disbelief at the cluelessness of rating agencies, the SEC, and banks regarding financial dealings.}
A distinction is made between stupidity and fraud, indicating that there may be illegal activities occurring within the financial system.}
There is a critique of individuals who claim to be cynical about the system yet still hold some faith in it, highlighting a contradiction in their beliefs.}
The Great Money Trick ( Robert Tressel)
A satirical demonstration of capitalism highlights inequality, exploitation of workers, and the cycle of poverty through the "Great Money Trick" metaphor. Detailed Summary for The Great Money Trick ( Robert Tressel) by Monica
00:03 In this segment, the discussion revolves around the concept of money and its implications on society, particularly focusing on the idea that money is a significant cause of poverty. A professor is introduced who is expected to elaborate on these themes through a demonstration involving audience participation.
The conversation highlights the notion that money is viewed as a primary contributor to poverty.}
A professor is introduced, indicating that he will present a lecture on the negative aspects of money.}
The speaker invites audience participation for a demonstration related to the concept of money.}
Bread is used as a metaphor to represent natural resources available for humanity, emphasizing that these resources were not created by humans.}
01:58 The segment discusses the concept of ownership and the capitalist system, emphasizing the disparity between the capitalist class and the working class, as well as the mechanisms that perpetuate this inequality through the 'great money trick.'
Introduction to the idea of ownership and its implications for society.}
Explanation of how the capitalist class inherits and retains control over resources, leaving the working class with nothing.}
Introduction of the 'great money trick' as a method for capitalists to exploit the labor of others.}
Discussion of how the capitalist system relies on the production of goods through the labor of workers.}
03:58 The video illustrates a satirical take on capitalism, showcasing the disparity between labor and compensation through a dialogue that emphasizes the exploitation inherent in the system.
The speaker identifies themselves as a 'kind capitalist,' suggesting a facade of benevolence in their business practices.}
Workers are offered a wage of one pound per week, but must produce three blocks of bread, highlighting the imbalance between labor input and compensation.}
The speaker references essential life necessities, indicating that access to basic needs is tied to monetary exchange, which they control.}
The dialogue underscores the desperation of the workers as they are compelled to pay for necessities, despite having produced value.}
06:27 The excerpt portrays a conversation between workers and a capitalist figure, highlighting the struggles of the working class in the face of economic hardship and the capitalist's indifference towards their plight.
The capitalist announces a shutdown of production due to a lack of work, emphasizing the precariousness of employment.}
A discussion arises about the lack of money, showcasing the workers' frustration and their need for basic necessities.}
The capitalist suggests that the workers should have been more thrifty, revealing a disconnect between the rich and the poor.}
The tension escalates as the workers express their hunger and desperation, while the capitalist threatens to call the police, illustrating the power dynamics at play.}
The conversation ends with a sarcastic remark about the capitalist's kindness, highlighting the irony of the situation and the workers' continued struggle.}
Krugman to Lietaer: "Never touch the money system!"
Paul Krugman advised Bernard Lietaer to avoid discussing the money system, warning it could harm academic opportunities and professional recognition. Detailed Summary for Krugman to Lietaer: "Never touch the money system!" by Monica
00:00 In this segment, Lietaer shares a personal anecdote about his conversation with economist Paul Krugman, emphasizing the taboo surrounding discussions about the money system.
Lietaer mentions a personal conversation with Paul Krugman.}
Krugman expresses skepticism about discussing the money issue.}
Both Lietaer and Krugman share a common educational background from MIT.}
Krugman warns Lietaer about the risks of engaging with the money system.}
00:20 The discussion emphasizes the critical importance of avoiding interference with the money system, warning that doing so can lead to significant academic and professional consequences.
The speaker advises against engaging with the money system.}
It is explained that touching the money system can lead to exclusion from important opportunities.}
The speaker warns that involvement with the money system can negatively impact one's academic standing.}
Bernard Lietaer - Why money needs to change now!
Bernard Lietaer discusses the systemic instability of traditional monetary systems due to monoculture, advocates for monetary diversity to enhance resilience, and highlights the potential of innovations like cryptocurrencies to stabilize economies. Detailed Summary for Bernard Lietaer - Why money needs to change now! by Monica
00:00 In this segment, Bernard Lietaer discusses the necessity of a diverse monetary ecosystem to address the instability of the current financial system, emphasizing the role of innovations like cryptocurrencies in promoting stability rather than chaos.
Introduction to the need for a monetary ecosystem.}
Discussion on the instability of the official monetary system due to its monoculture.}
Critique of conventional money and its perceived neutrality, arguing that it creates significant problems.}
Claim that the official system is structurally unstable and that innovations like Bitcoin can stabilize it.}
Engagement with the audience on their understanding of money creation and the role of central banks.}
08:39 Bernard Lietaer discusses the fundamental issues within our current monetary system, emphasizing the necessity of perpetual growth and the resulting concentration of wealth.
Lietaer explains that the current monetary system operates by creating money out of nothing, requiring borrowers to repay more than they borrowed.}
He highlights that without continual growth and new loans, the entire system collapses, leading to widespread bankruptcy.}
Lietaer points out that the structure of the monetary system inherently concentrates wealth, which is a significant and often overlooked issue.}
He provides statistical evidence showing that median household wealth is alarmingly low, illustrating the disparity in wealth distribution.}
17:20 Bernard Lietaer discusses the urgent need for a change in monetary systems due to their inherent instability and short-term focus, affecting long-term decision-making and economic health.
Lietaer critiques the artificial nature of interest rates and their distorting effects on economic decisions.}
He shares an anecdote about a CEO who prioritizes short-term results over long-term planning, highlighting the systemic issues in corporate decision-making.}
Lietaer presents alarming statistics about global monetary instability, emphasizing the frequency of banking crashes and sovereign debt crises.}
He draws a parallel between monetary crashes and the severe consequences they have on society, stressing the need for a reevaluation of current monetary practices.}
26:02 Bernard Lietaer discusses the need for monetary diversity and resilience in economic systems, emphasizing that excessive efficiency can lead to brittleness.
The discussion references historical instances in the U.S. and Germany during the 70s and 80s, highlighting issues with electricity efficiency.}
Lietaer argues that the current economic model operates on a monoculture of currency, which is no longer effective and requires a shift towards monetary diversity.}
The speaker asserts that resilience in systems often requires sacrificing some efficiency, suggesting a balance must be struck.}
He introduces the potential of digital monetary innovations, which could provide diversity and stability in the financial system.}
Lietaer concludes by discussing the mathematical relationship between efficiency and resilience, indicating that both extremes can lead to systemic issues.}
34:43 Bernard Lietaer discusses the counter-cyclical nature of alternative currencies in Switzerland, highlighting their role in stabilizing the economy during recessions. He contrasts this with conventional currencies, emphasizing the liquidity and acceptance of Swiss Francs over alternative currencies like 'weed' in economic booms and downturns.
Introduction to the counter-cyclical behavior of alternative currencies in Switzerland.}
Swiss Francs are preferred for their liquidity and broader acceptance, especially for international transactions.}
Switzerland's stable economy is attributed to accurate accounting practices and reliable national accounts.}
Discussion of various social purpose currencies in Germany and their growing participation among businesses.}
Mention of operational systems in Japan focused on elderly care, illustrating the variety of social purpose currencies.}
43:23 Bernard Lietaer discusses the need for a shift in societal values from patriarchal to matrifocal systems, emphasizing how this change is crucial for addressing ecological crises and developing diverse monetary systems.
Introduction to societal structures and their impact on quality of life.}
Discussion on the representation of the Divine and its correlation with societal values.}
Argument for a value shift away from patriarchal worldviews to ensure ecological survival.}
Call for monetary diversity as a solution to contemporary challenges, highlighting the role of technology.}
Recognition of cryptocurrencies as part of an evolving monetary landscape that can adapt to modern needs.}
52:05 Bernard Lietaer discusses the need for a shift in currency systems, emphasizing the importance of community currencies and their scalability to enhance economic resilience.
Introduction to community currencies and their existence.}
Overview of three existing currency systems, emphasizing their limitations in scalability.}
Examples of successful community currencies, particularly the Bristol Pound, and their acceptance in local governance.}
01:00:46 Bernard Lietaer discusses the need for a transformation in our understanding and use of money, emphasizing investment strategies and the implications of interest rates on future planning.
Historical perspectives on saving and investment highlight that ancient economies operated differently than modern systems.}
Lietaer suggests that contemporary currencies should be backed by tangible reserves, such as gold, to ensure stability.}
He contrasts the investment mindset of business leaders regarding their children versus their companies, pointing out a fundamental difference in valuation.}
The discussion includes the impact of interest rates on investment decisions, stressing that negative rates alter the perception of future value.}
Lietaer notes that all national currencies are created similarly, regardless of the economic system, highlighting a universal mechanism behind money creation.}
The New Servile State: On Banks, Tech Lords, and Modern Feudalism Parasitic Finance Sector
How bad has the problem of Monopoly and the Banks Got?
# US and UK Financial & Tech Sector Profit Analysis
## United States Market Share
### Financial Sector
- 1990: ~10% of total corporate profits
- 2000: ~40% of total corporate profits (peak during dotcom boom)
- 2013: ~30% of total corporate profits
- 2023: ~28% of total corporate profits
Key Source Quote:
> "Thirty years ago, the financial sector claimed around a tenth of U.S. corporate profits. Today, it's almost 30 percent." - The Atlantic
### Tech Sector (Top 5 Companies)
- 2023: ~25% of S&P 500 market value
- Combined with finance: ~53% of total corporate profits
## United Kingdom Market Share
### Financial Sector
- 2023: 8.8% of GDP (Financial and insurance services only)
- Banking sector represents approximately 25% of FTSE 100 profits
### Combined Tech & Finance
- 2023: Approximately 35% of total market profits
- Financial services dominate over tech sector
## Key Observations
1. United States
- Financial sector share has tripled since 1990
- Five biggest U.S. banks control half of industry's $15 trillion in assets
- Tech sector growth has accelerated since 2010
- Combined finance and tech sectors now represent over 50% of corporate profits
2. United Kingdom
- Financial sector more concentrated in London
- Lower tech sector representation compared to US
- More focused on traditional banking and insurance
- Total market share lower than US equivalent
## Important Context
From source material:
> "The five biggest U.S. banks now control half of the industry's $15 trillion in assets. Thirty years ago, the financial sector claimed around a tenth of U.S. corporate profits. Today, it is almost 30 percent."
## Methodological Notes
1. Data Limitations
- Different accounting standards between US and UK
- Varying definitions of financial sector activities
- Tech sector classification differences
- Cross-border revenue attribution challenges
2. Market Structure Differences
- US has larger tech sector representation
- UK more focused on traditional financial services
- Different regulatory environments
- Varying market capitalization methodologies
## Conclusion
The data shows a clear trend of increasing concentration in both markets, with the US showing higher levels of concentration than the UK. The US market has seen a more dramatic shift toward tech sector dominance, while the UK maintains a stronger traditional financial services focus.
The most reliable figures show:
- US Financial Sector: ~30% of corporate profits
- US Tech Sector: ~25% of market value
- UK Financial Sector: 8.8% of GDP
- UK Combined Finance & Tech: ~35% of market profits
These figures reflect a fundamental shift in both economies toward financial and technological services, though with different characteristics and concentrations in each market.
*Note: Some historical data points are approximations due to varying reporting standards and definitions over time. Focus has been placed on the most reliably sourced figures from the provided materials.*
# The New Servile State: On Banks, Tech Lords, and Modern Feudalism
## A Chestertonian Essay on Modern Financial Feudalism
There is a peculiar madness in our modern age that would have made our ancestors laugh, had they not been more likely to weep. We have, with great ceremony and self-congratulation, rebuilt the very walls of feudalism that our forefathers spent centuries dismantling. Only now we do not call them castle walls, but rather "financial institutions," and we do not call their masters barons, but rather "CEOs" and "hedge fund managers."
The great Lord Acton once warned us that "the issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks." How prophetic these words appear now, when we observe that the financial sector, which once claimed merely a tenth of corporate profits, now devours nearly 30 percent of all profits in the United States, like some great mechanical dragon consuming the wealth of nations.
## On Modern Robber Barons and Digital Fiefdoms
Our new feudal lords have grown craftier than their medieval counterparts. They no longer demand their tribute in grain or gold, but in digits and data. The tech giants and financial institutions have become what Belloc and I once warned against in our writings on the Servile State – masters of a new kind of slavery, where the chains are invisible but no less binding.
Consider this remarkable fact: in the United States, five banks now control half of the industry's $15 trillion in assets. The financial sector, which once modestly claimed around a tenth of U.S. corporate profits, now gorges itself on almost 30 percent. This is not capitalism; it is cartelism dressed in capitalist clothing.
## The Distributed Alternative
What we need, dear readers, is not what the socialists propose – replacing private monopolies with state monopolies – but rather what we Distributists have long advocated: the widespread distribution of property and capital. The problem with modern capitalism is not that there is too much capital in private hands, but that there are too few private hands holding it.
When we observe that twenty Americans now possess as much wealth as half their nation's population (some 152 million souls), we are not witnessing the triumph of free markets but their perversion. This is precisely the sort of concentration of power that Distributism was conceived to prevent.
## The Tech-Financial Complex
Our new aristocracy has formed an unholy alliance between Big Tech and High Finance. They have created what I shall call a "Tech-Financial Complex," where the data harvested by one feeds the profits of the other, and both feed upon the diminishing prosperity of the common man. The five largest technology companies now account for more than a fifth of the S&P 500's value – a concentration of economic power that would make the medieval guilds blush with envy.
## On Modern Tax Farming
Perhaps the most sinister aspect of our new servile state is what we might call "modern tax farming." Just as the French monarchy once sold the right to collect taxes to the infamous Fermiers Généraux, our modern states have effectively granted banks the exclusive right to create and distribute the medium of exchange. As noted in our sources, "Contemporary governments grant the exclusive power to issue the medium of taxation to a state sanctioned banking cartel."
## The Way Forward
The solution, as Belloc and I argued a century ago, remains the same: we must break up these new monopolies and distribute their power among the people. We need not fewer capitalists, but more of them. We need not the concentration of wealth, but its diffusion.
For as the data shows us, when wealth concentrates in too few hands, productivity itself begins to wither. The financial sector's dominance has coincided with a decline in productive investment, falling from historical rates of 2.8 percent growth to merely 1.2 percent in recent years.
## Conclusion
Let us end with this cheerful paradox: the way to save capitalism from the capitalists is to ensure that everyone becomes a capitalist. Not in the grand manner of the financial titans, but in the small, human scale that Distributism has always advocated. For it is not the size of the fortune that matters, but the number of fortunate.
The choice before us is clear: we can continue down the path toward a new feudalism, where the Tech-Financial Complex becomes our new aristocracy, or we can choose the path of Distributism, where property and power are as widely distributed as human nature allows. The former path leads to what Belloc called the Servile State; the latter leads to freedom.
And freedom, as Chesterton once remarked, is not a privilege to be conferred, but a property to be restored.
# Report: The Parasitic Nature of Modern Finance
## Introduction
- This report examines the growing concern over the financial sector's role in modern economies
- Key focus: Analysis of the 5% threshold theory proposed by monetary theorists including Bernard Lietaer and Steve Keen
- The report investigates when financial services transition from being beneficial to becoming parasitic in nature
Money and what I make of it.Underlined, Full Stop!
Where is anyones starting point apart from now this moment in time and space.
Looking at a beautiful view, looking at disaster and tragedy or a blank flickering screen. Now is always the beginning of what follows, always onwards, its known as the arrow of time.
The way ahead is though informed if we are lucky by some sort of strategy to navigate the obstacles or Lifes slings and Arrows of outrageous fortune.
Interpretations of those slings and arrows will vary wildly according to ones own life experiences, misfortunes or indeed fortunes.
It is a fact of modern life that what we call money looms large in the room available for manouvere through the slings and arrows impedeing our ideal route towards our own goals and dreams.
Yannis’s talk here Yanis Varoufakis On Ancient Greece And The Nature of Money is a good starting point, Carbon credits was the main absence from the discussion
Yanis Varoufakis On Ancient Greece And The Nature of Money
Yanis Varoufakis explores the evolution of money, its societal impacts, and philosophical implications, drawing connections from ancient Greece to modern capitalism and digital currencies. Detailed Summary for Yanis Varoufakis On Ancient Greece And The Nature of Money by Monica
00:00 Yanis Varoufakis shares insights on the nature of money, drawing connections between personal experiences, historical perspectives, and philosophical reflections on its role in society.
Introduction and gratitude for the opportunity to speak.}
Varoufakis reflects on his early memories of money and its significance.}
He discusses the philosophical implications of money, comparing it to a transformative force that alters perceptions of value.}
The relationship between money and humanity is explored, emphasizing its dual nature as both a reflection of society and a source of alienation.}
Varoufakis concludes with a personal anecdote that illustrates the pervasive impact of money on human relationships and societal issues.}
07:16 Yanis Varoufakis discusses the nature of money through personal anecdotes and historical context, emphasizing the transformation of materials like iron and gold in ancient Greece and their cultural significance.
Varoufakis reflects on his grandmother's relationship with money during the Nazi occupation, illustrating a time when the economy was largely demonetized due to hyperinflation.}
He explores the metaphysical qualities of metals, particularly gold, and how their enduring nature has influenced human perception and value throughout history.}
Varoufakis shares insights from his father's research on iron, highlighting its historical importance and the transformative processes that made it valuable to ancient Greeks.}
He connects ancient literature, specifically Homer's Odyssey, to the significance of iron, illustrating how cultural narratives reflect the material's impact on society.}
14:34 Yanis Varoufakis discusses the historical significance of monetary systems, particularly the transition from the gold standard to a more flexible dollar-based system, and its implications on global economics.
The discussion begins with a unique historical moment characterized by strong economic growth and reduced inequality under the dollar standard.}
The conversation shifts to the pivotal year of 1971 when President Nixon ended the gold standard, marking a significant change in the relationship between money and gold.}
Varoufakis explains the balancing act the U.S. faced between maintaining a stable international economic system and allowing for national policy flexibility.}
The narrative continues with the challenges Europe faced in the 1980s as a result of the U.S.'s controlled disintegration of the world economy.}
Finally, the video addresses Europe's response to economic instability by attempting to establish its own gold standard amidst the turmoil.}
22:00 Yanis Varoufakis discusses the historical context of money, its political implications, and the philosophical aspects of its role in society.
Varoufakis references a character from the Trojan War who felt wronged by his king, illustrating early grievances related to wealth and power.}
He compares money to language, emphasizing that both are social constructs that facilitate collaboration but can also serve conservative agendas.}
The discussion shifts to the European Central Bank, critiquing its role in centralizing monetary power and diminishing democratic control over national currencies.}
Varoufakis concludes with a philosophical reflection on the purpose of money, suggesting it should serve meaningful human ends rather than merely function as a tool of power.}
29:17 Yanis Varoufakis discusses the historical perspective on money, its implications on human behavior, and the origins of currency, particularly in ancient Greece.
Varoufakis reflects on the endless pursuit of money, suggesting it can trap individuals in a cycle of constant striving without fulfillment.}
He contrasts the ancient Greek mindset with modern views, indicating a dangerous obsession with wealth that can lead to a poor quality of life.}
Varoufakis raises questions about the ethical constraints on finance, emphasizing the historical context of banking in ancient Athens.}
He traces the origins of money back to Mesopotamia, highlighting the collective nature of farming and the need for a system of record-keeping.}
Varoufakis notes that the first coins were used long before they were minted, illustrating an interesting evolution in the concept of currency.}
36:33 In this segment, Yanis Varoufakis discusses the evolution of money and its connection to societal structures, particularly focusing on the transition from feudalism to capitalism. He explains how the production and distribution processes have transformed over time, highlighting the role of credit and financial systems in shaping economic relationships.
Introduction to the concept of money as a claim represented on coins.}
Discussion on the transition from feudalism to capitalism and the reversal of causality between production and distribution.}
Explanation of how financing and loans are essential for initiating production processes.}
Overview of the fundamental transformation that led to capitalism and its ability to unleash productive powers.}
Reference to John Law's influence on French public debt and its implications for modern monetary theory.}
43:58 Yanis Varoufakis discusses the philosophical and political implications of money, drawing parallels between dystopian narratives and the nature of value in a capitalist society. He explores how the transformation of humans into mere energy sources threatens the very essence of value production.
Varoufakis introduces a dystopian view of humanity as mere energy sources within a system.}
He emphasizes the importance of understanding what creates value from a political economy perspective.}
The discussion highlights the pressure on employers to dehumanize workers, risking bankruptcy if value is not produced.}
Varoufakis reflects on the contrast between technological advancements and increasing social misery.}
He references Friedrich von Hayek's arguments against government money and the need for alternative political concepts of money.}
51:10 Yanis Varoufakis discusses the nature of money, emphasizing the political implications of digital currencies like Bitcoin and exploring the emergence of real currencies within video game communities.
Varoufakis critiques the common perception of Bitcoin as merely a digital currency, highlighting its connection to traditional forms of money like silver and gold.}
He warns that the romanticized notions of political money often conceal regressive and undemocratic agendas, likening some digital currencies to Ponzi schemes.}
The discussion shifts to the fascinating phenomenon of spontaneously emerging currencies in video game communities, which allowed players to earn real income through their participation.}
Varoufakis explains that these video game economies operate on market principles without traditional capitalist employment contracts, enabling individuals to thrive independently.}
An Integral View on Money and Financial Crashes By Bernard Lietaer October 2005
There are many ways to approach as complex a topic as money or a financial crash. An integral view would require it to be approached from both the inner and the outer viewpoints. Such inner and outer dimensions of reality are synthetically summarized in Ken Wilber’s classical four quadrant analysis.1 All fields of knowledge are classified by distinguishing between the Interior (the domains where the aim is the interpretation of meaning) vs. the Exterior dimensions (where the purpose is description of behavior). This approach is completed by distinguishing between the Individual vs. the Collective aspects (see Figure 1). Exterior (Description of Behavior) Interior (Interpretation of Meaning) Individual Collective Spirituality Individual Psychology Physics Biology Empiricism Behaviorism Cultural History Collective Psychology Evolutionary Psychology Systems Theory Economics Political Economy Social Systems Figure 1: Ken Wilber’s Four Quadrants Classifying Domains of Knowledge 2 For instance, physics, biology, and all behavioral and empirical sciences correspond to the upper right quadrant (Exterior-Individual domains). In contrast, the domains explored by Aurobindo, Plotinus, Buddha and all other spiritual traditions fall into the upper left quadrant; as do the theories of Freud, Piaget and others focusing on individual psychology (they all correspond to Individual-Interior concerns).
Chapter 4: Exploring Booms and Busts “The gods have to do with emotional intensity and distance, preferences for mental acuity,... yearning for ecstatic merger or panoramic understanding, sense of time, and much more. There are gods in Everyman.” Jean Shinoda Bolen13 “Anyone taken as an individual is tolerably sensible and reasonable. As a member of a crowd, he at once becomes a blockhead.” Schiller “Financial manias”, also called “bubbles and crashes” and “boom and bust” cycles refer to the episodic “crazes” wherein some market goes into a price frenzy only to collapse as it reaches its paroxysm. They are relatively rare - on the average there is one spectacular crash every 15-20 years somewhere in the world. But they are totally devastating to the people and country affected. Notwithstanding centuries of fine-tuning regulations and controls, financial manias have proven a remarkable “hardy perennial” in Charles Kindleberger’s words.14 They seem invariably to hit the markets at the moment when they believe they have become impervious to such “primal” or “primitive” irrational problems. Finally, they are also a bafflingly unexplainable process from the perspective of a “rational market” supposedly inhabited by hyper-rational “economic men.”
Baffled Authorities The periodic booms and busts, and the incapacity of the most sophisticated and powerful financial authorities to do something about them, is repeated at every generation. Some quotes illustrate the point. “At intervals, from causes which are not the present purpose, money...seeks someone to devour, and there is ‘plethora’; it finds someone, and there is ‘speculation’; it is devoured, and there is ‘panic’.” Walter Bagehot (1873) 15 “I can feel it coming, S.E.C. or not, a whole new round of disastrous speculation, with all the familiar stages in order - blue-chip boom, then a fad for secondary issues, then an overthe-counter play, then another garbage market in new issues, and finally the inevitable crash. I don’t know when it will come, but I can feel it coming, and damn it, I don’t know what to do about it.” Bernard J. Lasker Chairman of the New York Stock Exchange (1970) 16 “The financial markets are now driven by an irrational exuberance.”17 Alan Greenspan Chairman of the US Federal Reserve in December 5, 1996
MacKay shows that “crowd madness” has existed at every age. It is interesting that all “crazes” reported by MacKay from the last four centuries (i.e. after the maximum repression of the feminine due to 350 years of witch hunts) were financial ones. Primary products, manufactured goods, land, buildings, stocks and currencies have all succumbed at some point to the fevers of destabilizing financial speculation. After each of the “financial madness” episodes, authorities try to understand what went wrong. They then introduce rules that are supposed to avoid future crashes, typically by regulating the “last kid on the block” financial innovation of the time - from futures markets in 1637 to computer trading in 1987. But the process keeps repeating itself even in the most sophisticated markets. One could even make the seemingly paradoxical argument that financial manias have a tendency to occur in the most sophisticated markets of their times. Holland in the 17th century was by far the most important financial market of its time: the Dutch Republic held and traded as much capital as the rest of Europe combined when the tulip mania hit it in 1637. Similarly, England in the 18th century (the South Sea Bubble of 1720); New York, Vienna and Berlin (simultaneously involved in the international panic of 1873); the US stock market in 1929; Japan in 1990; all experienced crashes when these countries and markets were near the top of their financial sophistication and glory. If this observation proves valid, it would also make predictable that the next bubble to burst should be the US stock market, and specifically the Internet and high tech components. Whatever the case, even just relying on history known as of this writing, financial booms and crashes provide those rare “perfect” cases of quantifiable psychological history. Given the relative rarity of major boom and bust cycles, the best way to find out what is going on is to take a historical comparison and detect whether there are common patterns.
The Future of Money-Bernard Lietaer
Preface
Deep in our hearts, we all want to leave a better world for our children and we cherish the hope that we may experience this for ourselves in our own lifetime.
However, there is growing concern that many of the challenges we now face are unrelenting and more and more people question our ability to address them effectively. Indeed, despite some breakthroughs and the valiant efforts in the public and private sectors, the challenges to our planet and society are growing both in scope and severity with each passing decade.
In this new Millennium, we are being challenged by four megatrends that are converging upon us over the next twenty years, namely:
*Climate change and loss of biodiversity;
* An unprecedented growth in the number of elderly (the Age Wave');
^Monetary Instability;
* and an Information Revolution.
(The evidence for each one of these megatrends and for the collective breakdowns they will provoke are described in Chapter 1.)
Why is this? Why have our efforts, the countless billions of pounds and dollars spent all over the world, the many treaties enacted and initiatives taken, not stopped the destruction of our environment, nor effectively addressed a myriad of social issues? Is it possible that our attentions and efforts are misdirected?
Or are the challenges and issues facing our world today being fuelled by an even deeper systematic problem?
The short answer to this last question is yes.
The Future of Money is a compendium report about solutions already implemented by thousands of people around the world, who have had the courage to first identify, then directly address the underlying mechanism of their problems. Their initiatives to date are small-scale, but I see them as seedlings which - if allowed to grow - have the potential to provide effective and permanent solutions by which conditions for mankind and other living systems may improve dramatically within our own lifetimes.
The underlying mechanisms referred to here turn out to be specific features of our money system. Money or lack thereof, is a fundamental component of our lives. It is not, however, just the lack of money that is precipitating present trends or preventing us from addressing current challenges. Rather, it is the limited functionality of our money and monetary system that is a major force behind our present disorders.
Fish to do not comprehend the nature of the water in which they live. Similarly, people have trouble understanding the nature of money. We allocate a great portion of our physical, emotional, and mental energy to getting, keeping, and spending money - but how many of us really know what money is or where it comes from?
Is Our Monetary Structure a Systemic Cause for Financial Instability? Evidence and Remedies from Nature
Abstract Fundamental laws govern all complex flow systems, including natural ecosystems, economic and financial systems. Natural ecosystems are practical exemplars of sustainability: enduring, vital, adaptive. The sustainability of any complex flow system can be measured with a single metric as an emergent property of its structural diversity and interconnectivity; it requires a balance in emphasis between efficiency and resilience. The urgent message for economics from nature is that the monoculture of national currencies, justified on the basis of market efficiency, generates structural instability in our global financial system. Economic sustainability therefore requires diversification in types of currencies, specifically through complementary currencies.
Why is the financial crisis of 2008 treated as if it were the first? The World Bank has identified more than 96 previous banking crises and 176 monetary crises since President Nixon introduced the floating exchange regime in the early 1970s (Caprio & Klingebiel, 1996). Even before this period, financial booms and bust cycles were, in Kindleberger's words, a remarkably "hardy perennial" (Kindleberger, 1978); he inventories no less than 48 massive crashes between the 1637 tulip mania in Holland and the 1929 crash on Wall Street. In short, it may be tempting to consider financial and monetary instability as a given, as part of Schumpeter's "creative destruction" of capitalism. But Schumpeter was referring mainly to the rise and fall of business units, not the monetary system. Could it be that a bug in the monetary system keeps crashing the operating system of capitalism, and that this has generated financial instability during the entire Modern capitalist era? Our view is that such repeated breakdowns, in very different countries and times, under different regulatory environments, and in economies with very different degrees of development, signal some underlying structural problem. If such a deeper mechanism is involved, it could explain why each new set of regulations achieves, at best, only a reduction in the frequency of banking and monetary crises, without getting rid of them and their horrific economic and socio-political consequences.
Nulla fides pietasqve viris, qvi castra seqvuntur:
A Pattern Language.
79. YOUR OWN HOME
in the imperishable primal language of the human heart house means my house, your house, a man’s own house. The house is the winning throw of the dice which man has wrested from the uncanniness of universe; it is his defense against the chaos that threatens to invade him. Therefore his deeper wish is that it be his own house, that he not have to share with anyone other than his own family. (Martin Buber, A Believing Humanism: Gleanings, New York: Simon and Shuster, 1969, p. 93.)
This pattern is not intended as an argument in favor of “private property,” or the process of buying and selling land. Indeed, it is very clear that all those processes which encourage speculation in land, for the sake of profit, are unhealthy and destructive, because they invite people to treat houses as commodities, to build things for “resale,” and not in such a way as to fit their own needs.
And just as speculation and the profit motive make it impossible for people to adapt their houses to their own needs, so tenancy, rental, and landlords do the same. Rental areas are always the first to turn to slums. The mechanism is clear and well known. See, for example, George Sternlieb, The Tenement Landlord (Rutgers University Press, 1966). The landlord tries to keep his maintenance and repair costs as low as possible; the residents have no incentive to maintain and repair the homes—in fact, the opposite—since improvements add to the wealth of the landlord, and even justify higher rent. And so the typical piece of rental property degenerates over the years. Then landlords try to build new rental properties which are immune to neglect—gardens are replaced with concrete, carpets are replaced with lineoleum, and wooden surfaces by formica: it is an attempt to make the new units maintenance-free, and to stop the slums by force; but they turn out cold and sterile and again turn into slums, because nobody loves them.
People will only be able to feel comfortable in their houses, if they can change their houses to suit themselves, add on whatever they need, rearrange the garden as they like it; and, of course, they can only do this in circumstances where they are the legal owners of the house and land; and if, in high density multi-story housing, each apartment, like a house, has a well-defined volume, in which the owner can make changes as he likes.
This requires then, that every house is owned—in some fashion—by the people that live in it; it requires that every house, whether at ground level or in the air, has a well-defined volume within which the family is free to make whatever changes they want; and it requires a form of ownership which discourages speculation.
Several approaches have been put forward in recent years to solve the problem of providing each household with a “home.” At one extreme there are ideas like Habraken’s high density “support” system, where families buy pads on publicly owned superstructures and gradually develop their own homes. And at the other extreme there are the rural communes, where people have forsaken the city to create their own homes in the country. Even modified forms of rental can help the situation if they allow people to change their houses according to their needs and give people some financial stake in the process of maintenance. This helps, because renting is often a step along the way to home ownership; but unless tenants can somehow recover their investments in money and labor, the hopeless cycle of degeneration of rental property and the degeneration of the tenants’ financial capability will continue. (Cf. Rolf Goetze, “Urban Housing Rehabilitation,” in Turner and Fichter, eds., The Freedom to Build, New York: Macmillan, 1972.)
MN: It converges to a constant which is approximately 31%, and this is a mathematical curiosity.
Ard: Natural selection would say the co-operators would get wiped out, because they are paying a cost to help their competitors. And yet it’s not happening. So why?
MN: The reason why it’s not happening is because the co-operators form clusters and in those clusters of co-operators, they actually get a high payoff. They have a high fitness.
David: So they do better?
MN: They do better than the defectors that are surrounded by other defectors. So we always have to ask, on the edge between a co-operator and defector cluster, who is actually winning?
MN: Because the co-operator, even though sitting on the edge, is still getting all the help from other co-operators inside, but a defector is, sort of, getting no help from his defectors. And therefore the co-operators form these clusters that can persist and can even grow in the presence of defectors.
Ard: So this is a bit like, if I’m with my neighbours and we help each other, then we’ll, in the end, be better off than the neighbours one block down who don’t help one another.
MN: Yes, that’s right. So the neighbours that help each other, they form a community that is cooperative, and the neighbours who don’t help each other, they form a community that is defective. And the first can prosper and the other one will kind of perish.
David: Is this, sort of, an addition to the rule of competition in natural selection. Is this a natural law of cooperation?
MN: I think the very interesting observation is the following: going back to first principles, natural selection favours defectors over co-operators. Yet we have cooperation in nature, and we need to find a reason why there is cooperation in nature. And thousands of papers have been written on that topic, actually, and I have been trying to classify all those different propositions into five mechanisms.
And what we’re seeing here is one of those five mechanisms, for the evolution of cooperation, that I call spatial selection.
Thu, Jan 6, 9:25 AM I have been getting my head further around The Energy Market and how it affects the money supply
I think the priority variables are:
1. Electricity Base Load production, Coal and Natural Gas, and LPG products? 2. Crude Oil Production and Refinery capacities, Volumes of production are more important than the price per barrel 3. Swing Production from Shale or Capped and ready to go existing discoveries, Very important to who has upper hand on Marginal pricing on swing production, Texas Rail Road, OPEC, US Shale production? 4. Gas Production and Coal production are probably equal with 3 or interchangeable with 3. 5. Venezuelan and Iranian supply disruption through Sanctions is a political bottleneck to an otherwise trivial supply problem in the Oil Market. 6. Geo-Political and Green New Deal political economy choices vis Gas Pipe Lines are again self-inflicted own goals? Why? 7. Money Velocity and Money Supply related to energy use growth are being severely impacted by levels of Consumer, Corporate and Sovereign debt.
For those who are feeling jaded, confused and resentful. 12 Log 2 -8 we are the 31.7766166719343%.
Hang in there on line is the domain of pareto efficiency 80/20
The reversion to the mean dictated by the universe is such that we the 31.77% will endure and prosper
“post facto ad hoc adjudicum”
creating the narrative after the fact merely selling a foregone conclusion – #3dMonkeys , Deaf Dumb and Blind in 3 dimensions.
The Stability of Nature's Logarithm vs The Tipping Points of Pareto Distributions
Introduction
In the realm of mathematical patterns that govern our universe, we find ourselves at an intriguing crossroads between two fundamental concepts: the natural logarithm and the Pareto principle. Today, we'll explore a fascinating hypothesis: while logarithmic growth (particularly base-2 logarithms) represents a stable, sustainable pattern in nature, the 80/20 Pareto distribution tends to create unstable systems that lead to exponential tipping points.
The Natural Logarithm: Nature's Stabilizer
The natural logarithm, particularly in the form of 12log2−812log2 −8, represents a fundamental pattern we see throughout nature. This logarithmic pattern is found in:
Spiral patterns in galaxies
The growth of shells
Population growth under resource constraints
Information theory and entropy
The key characteristic of logarithmic growth is its inherent stability - it naturally slows down as values increase, creating self-limiting systems.
The Pareto Principle: A Double-Edged Sword
The 80/20 rule, while powerful for describing many human systems, carries within it the seeds of instability. When we observe that:
20% of the population controls 80% of the wealth
20% of the effort produces 80% of the results
20% of the causes lead to 80% of the effects
We're actually looking at a system that's prone to what mathematicians call "positive feedback loops."
Martin Nowak's Perspective
Martin Nowak's work in evolutionary dynamics provides crucial insights into this phenomenon. His research on cooperation and competition in biological systems shows that:
Systems that follow logarithmic patterns tend to promote cooperation
Pareto-like distributions can lead to winner-take-all scenarios
The Documentary Connection
"Why Are We Here?" by David Malone and Ard Louis explores these mathematical patterns in the context of existence itself. The documentary highlights how natural logarithmic patterns appear to be built into the fabric of the universe, while human-made systems often follow Pareto distributions that can lead to instability.
Mathematical Evidence
Let's look at the stability comparison:
Natural Logarithm Growth:
Follows the pattern: f(x)=ln(x)f(x)=ln(x)
Growth rate decreases as x increases
Stable and self-limiting
Pareto Distribution:
Follows the pattern: f(x)=x−αf(x)=x−α where αα is close to 1
Can lead to extreme concentrations
Prone to tipping points
Implications and Conclusions
The hypothesis appears to hold merit when we consider:
Stability: Natural logarithmic patterns provide built-in stability mechanisms, while Pareto distributions tend toward increasing inequality.
Sustainability: Systems based on logarithmic growth are more sustainable long-term, whereas Pareto-distributed systems often require external intervention to prevent collapse.
Tipping Points: The 80/20 rule, when left unchecked, can evolve into 90/10, then 95/5, creating increasingly unstable systems prone to sudden changes.
Final Thoughts
The contrast between these mathematical patterns offers important lessons for fields ranging from economics to ecology. While the Pareto principle can be useful for describing and understanding systems, its inherent instability suggests we should be cautious about building systems that reinforce this distribution.
Perhaps the answer lies in designing systems that better mirror the natural logarithmic patterns we see in nature - patterns that have stood the test of time and continue to maintain stability across billions of years of evolution.
This analysis suggests that your hypothesis about the stability of logarithmic patterns versus the instability of Pareto distributions is well-founded, particularly when viewed through the lens of complex systems theory and evolutionary dynamics.
The key takeaway is that while both patterns exist in nature and human systems, logarithmic patterns tend to promote stability and sustainability, while Pareto distributions, though efficient in some ways, can lead to potentially dangerous concentrations and tipping points if left unchecked.
Mr Lietaer presented his arguments during a lecture, hosted by the Club of Rome’s EU Chapter in Brussels, to launch the Report from Club of Rome: Money and Sustainability: the Missing Link.
Get a copy: In order to buy a copy of Money and sustainability: The Missing Link please follow this link.
Current monetary system is inherently unstable and destructive
The Report acknowledges that money has ignited an explosion of entrepreneurial and scientific innovation, but says it is structurally unstable and that current problems cannot be solved by simply tinkering with the system. “It would be naïve to think that innovations are magic bullets to solve all our problems. We can no longer afford to overlook new currencies that could promote sustainability”, said Bernard Lietaer.
The Report describes how between 1970 and 2010, there were 145 banking crises, 208 monetary crises, and 72 sovereign debt crises – in other words a total of 425 systemic crises – an average of more than ten each year. The current Greek crisis is simply the last in a long line.
Mark Dubrulle, President of the EU Chapter, which organised the lecture said “Almost everything is for sale in most EU countries. Austerity is imposed at all levels… We hope the book will inspire many a decision maker and opinion leader to change course.”
The solution: the creation of complementary currency systems
The Report says monetary instability could be solved by creating complementary cooperative currency systems (generically called the ‘Civic’) to work in parallel with conventional bank-debt money, counterbalancing its negative effects. It outlines eight examples of cooperative currency systems that can address issues such as healthcare, education, climate change, and employment.
Bernard Lietaer and his co-authors also suggest a solution to the current Greek/Eurozone crisis based on Greece creating complementary urban or regional electronic currencies to run parallel to the euro which the country would retain for international business. The civic/euro exchange rate would be determined in the online market.
Interestingly, this week Deutsche Bank proposed a very similar solution – the creation of the ‘Geuro’, a complementary Greek currency to help it restore an internal competitive economy
Each of four theoretical traditions in the study of American politics—which can be characterized as theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy, Economic-Elite Domination, and two types of interest-group pluralism, Majoritarian Pluralism and Biased Pluralism—offers different predictions about which sets of actors have how much influence over public policy: average citizens; economic elites; and organized interest groups, mass-based or business-oriented.
What I have found in the ten plus years I have been studying this seriously is that the questions have become sharper I started really with Tomlinson and the Michael Journal
https://www.michaeljournal.org/
There are some great documentary films as well I have embedded many of them on this web page.
Marx , Franklin,Quiggley, Lenin, Technocracy (1933), Shubick, Aristotle and the Word of God.
For the LORD your God detests anyone who does these things, anyone who deals dishonestly ” (Deut 25:13-16).
The Magic Money Tree.
a Poem by Roger G Lewis
Money Grows on Merkle Trees
A Creature of Cryptography
The Computer Has to say yes
So Banks can issue Debt You see.
Central Banks prune Merkle Trees
Adjusting the rate of Usury
Government Borrowing and Private debt
Add up to the money that you get
Economists argue about Theories Three
Commodity, Chartalist or Credit Theory
In Truth all Theories of the Merkel tree?
Are Based upon a Tautology, That´s MMT.
The Simple rhyme that you can sing is
Moneynow is the NOTHINGyouget
for SOMETHINGbefore youcan get
ANYTHING. Let’s all Join In.
The sectoral Balances approach to aggregate demand is a tautological accounting identity Explication of the Magic Money tree is my simple aim. I have written Longer poems on political economy and about energy based calibrations of the unit of account and value Usury hells Fuel Mans oppressor, Tides of the Dollar Moon and Bourgoise resolution and Globalisation unentangled all explore these areas. I have also written a Novel #ConquestofDough
Money Credit and Debt in quotes from some well known names.
“Talk about centralisation! The credit system, which has its focus in the so-called national banks and the big money-lenders and usurers surrounding them, constitutes enormous centralisation, and gives this class of parasites the fabulous power, not only to periodically despoil industrial capitalists, but also to interfere in actual production in a most dangerous manner— and this gang knows nothing about production and has nothing to do with it.” Marx[1]
“There is a certain proportionate Quantity of Money requisite to carry on the Trade of a Country freely and currently; More than which would be of no Advantage in Trade, and Less, if much less, exceedingly detrimental to it. This leads us to the following general Considerations.”
“Money and Goods are different, most confusion in economic thinking arises from a failure to recognize this fact. Goods are wealth which you have, while money is a claim on wealth which you do not have. Thus goods are an asset; money is a debt. If goods are wealth; money is not wealth, or negative wealth, or even anti-wealth. They always behave in opposite ways, just as they usually move in opposite directions. If the value of one goes up, the value of the other goes down, and in the same proportion.” Carol Quiggley(2b)
“A “powerful apparatus”! The “powerful apparatus”= transferring from one state pocket into another such remarkable “real values” as Soviet rubles…. Current accounts expressed in gold rubles (and even that falsely, not at the real parity) 2.8–7.9–10.3 million rubles (on Dec. 16, Jan. 16, and Feb. 1). Ha-ha! And how are they made up? 90–98 per cent are revenues from our state trusts, i.e., the same official bits of paper from the same bureaucrats! At present the State Bank=a bureaucratic paper game. There is the truth for you, if you want to hear not the sweet communist-official lies (with which everyone feeds you as a high mandarin), but the truth.” Lenin (3)
“discussions — of ‘value,’ of fluctuating prices, of the gold standard, of changing interest rates, of items of pecuniary wealth which are at the same time items of debt — are merely discussions looking toward a readjustment of the factors which prevent them .The problem of analysing political choices against the metric of a Monetary measure is the Money as a Thing is most certainly a Variable and like any good technologist, scientist or metrologist will tell you a unit of measurement has to be clearly defined and fixed. The dollar. He notes that it is a variable. Why anyone should attempt, on this earth, to use a variable as a measuring rod is so utterly absurd that he dismisses any serious consideration of its use in his study of what should be done”.
“He also considers ‘price’ and ‘value’ and the fine-spun theories of philosophers and economists who have attempted to surround these terms with the semblance of meaning. These terms, like the monetary unit, may have had meaning to men in the past but they mean nothing whatsoever to the modern technologist. The standard of measurement is not relevant to the things measured; and the measuring rod and the things, measured as if they were stable, are all variables.”
”The monetary and financial system of an economy are part of the socio-politico-economic control mechanism used by every state to connect the economy with the polity and society. This neural network provides the administrative means to collect taxes, direct investment, provide public goods, trade. The money measures provide a crude but serviceable basis for the accounting system which in turn, along with the codification of commercial law and financial regulation are the basis for economic evaluation and the measurement of trust and fiduciary responsibility among the economic agents. A central feature of a control mechanism is that it is designed to influence process. Dynamics is its natural domain. Equilibrium is not the prime concern, the ability to control the direction of motion is what counts. Money and financial institutions provide the command and control system of a modern society. The study of the mechanism, how they are formed, how they are controlled and manipulated and how their influence is measured in terms of social, political, and economic purpose pose questions, not in pure economics, not even in a narrow political economy, but in the broad compass of a political economy set in the context of society. ” Martin Shubik (5)
“The most hated sort, and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself, and not from the natural object of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange, but not to increase at interest. And this term interest, which means the birth of money from money, is applied to the breeding of money because the offspring resembles the parent. Wherefore of all modes of getting wealth this is the most unnatural.” Aristotle(6)
“Do not have two differing weights in your bag-one heavy, one light. Do not have two differing measures in your house-one large, one small. You must have accurate and honest weights and measures, so that you may live long in the land the LORD your God is giving you. For the LORD your God detests anyone who does these things, anyone who deals dishonestly”
00:01 David Graeber discusses the hidden economic principles that are often considered taboo in society, particularly focusing on the relationship between government debt and private sector debt.
Introduction to the idea that anthropologists explore societal taboos, including economic topics.}
Graeber introduces the 'Peter-Paul principle,' explaining how government debt impacts individual debt levels.}
The concept of accounting identity is explained, illustrating how increases in government surplus lead to deficits in the private sector.}
Graeber poses a rhetorical question about the necessity of debt, emphasizing that living within means would eliminate money circulation.}
01:43 David Graeber discusses the nature of money and debt, revealing how they are intertwined with power dynamics in society and the impact on individuals.
Introduction to the concept of money as a form of IOU, highlighting that banknotes represent circulating government debt.}
Exploration of how debt distribution is influenced more by power than fiscal responsibility, with the wealthy often escaping debt burdens.}
Discussion on how government surplus translates to increased personal debt for individuals, leading to higher interest rates on loans.}
Commentary on the implications of government financial practices, suggesting that balancing the budget makes it harder for individuals to manage their own finances.}
