From Totalitarian State Monopoly Stagnation to Distributism.
The Factions of "we Deserve Better" or "Britain Deserves Better Owen Jones or George Galloway, Bastani or Brand . #Donteatyellowsnow.
As we find ourselves at a pivotal moment in history, it is crucial to comprehensively examine the societal systems that have influenced our world. While capitalism has undoubtedly driven remarkable progress and wealth, it has also perpetuated profound inequalities, excessive consumption, and a prevalent sense of detachment. As we contemplate the future of human society, it becomes increasingly important to envisage the potential of a post-capitalist era.
The notion of a post-capitalist society may initially appear radical or unrealistic, but upon closer inspection, it emerges as a compelling and feasible alternative to the current state of affairs. It is not a call for disorder or lawlessness, but rather a thoughtful reimagination of our societal, economic, and political frameworks to promote fairness, sustainability, and human well-being. At the core of this vision lies the recognition that capitalism, with its focus on private ownership, profit maximization, and market competition, has perpetuated systems of power and privilege that disenfranchise significant portions of the population. It has led to the accumulation of wealth and resources in the hands of a few, while leaving many others struggling to fulfill their basic needs. Furthermore, the relentless pursuit of economic growth has come at a significant cost, contributing to excessive resource waste and environmental degradation.
In a post-capitalist society, the fundamental concept of private property as we currently understand it would be reevaluated. Instead of perpetuating a system where a small minority holds disproportionate control over resources, there would be a shift towards collective ownership and participatory control. This does not imply the elimination of personal belongings or individual autonomy, but rather a restructuring of property relationships to ensure that the common good takes precedence over narrow self-interest. Central to this restructuring is the idea of shared prosperity and fair distribution of resources. It entails moving away from an economic model driven solely by profit accumulation towards one that prioritizes meeting the needs of all members of society. It involves redefining the purpose of production and consumption, placing greater emphasis on social welfare, environmental sustainability, and human development. In such a society, the dynamics of power would undergo a profound transformation.
Hierarchies and suppressive structures inherent in capitalism would give way to more inclusive and participatory decision-making processes. Rather than being dictated by corporate elites or political oligarchies, governance would be decentralized and participatory, allowing for diverse voices and perspectives to shape policies and practices. The transition to a post-capitalist society would also necessitate rethinking work and labor. Instead of being driven by unfair labor practices and precarious employment conditions, work would be reimagined as a means of personal fulfillment and contribution to the common good. The focus would shift from maximizing productivity and profit for the few to ensuring meaningful and dignified livelihoods for all. Critics may argue that such a paradigm shift is idealistic and unattainable, citing human nature and historical precedents as insurmountable barriers. However, history is replete with examples of transformative social movements and paradigm shifts that have challenged entrenched power structures and ushered in progressive change. Efforts like the abolition of slavery, the fight for gender equality, and the civil rights movement illustrate the capability of human societies to evolve and progress. Furthermore, the rise of collaborative enterprises, community-led initiatives, and grassroots movements around the world exemplifies the increasing interest in alternative economic and social arrangements. These efforts embody the principles of solidarity, mutual aid, and collective empowerment that are foundational to a post-capitalist vision.
It is important to recognize that envisioning a post-capitalist society does not mean overlooking the complexities and challenges inherent in such a transition. It demands thorough analysis, thoughtful deliberation, and inclusive dialogue to navigate the intricacies of restructuring our economic and social fabric. It requires a commitment to dismantling entrenched power structures while fostering solidarity and collaboration across diverse communities.
In conclusion, the prospect of moving beyond capitalism towards a post-capitalist society calls for deep introspection about the kind of world we desire to create. It requires surpassing conventional wisdom and imagining new possibilities for organizing our collective existence. While the path ahead may be filled with uncertainties and obstacles, it is our responsibility to embark on this journey with bravery, empathy, and a steadfast commitment to building a fair, sustainable, and inclusive future for all. As we embark on this transformative course, let us heed the words of Albert Einstein: "We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them." It is time to embrace new paradigms, challenge established beliefs, and dare to envision a world where justice, equality, and human dignity form the foundation of our social order.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PQDqJDpDOheEsfMVlQNKh2rE2eFYOslF/view?usp=sharing
Key Messages
Based on myths and false dilemmas, the mainstream narrative around the crisis still
dominates discussion. Breaking away from this, this guide shows that:
• The process of European integration facilitated a transfer of wealth and pow-
er from poor to rich countries through debt instruments and trade relations.
Economic imbalances between countries were widened due to the euro area
structure and the response to the crisis.
• Private sector debts were nationalised creating huge problems for public fi-
nances; yet myths were spun to justify a ‘solution’ that involved ever increasing
amounts of sovereign debt whilst imposing widespread unemployment and
dramatic reductions in living standards.
• A step towards social and economic justice would be for these debts to be can-
celled and those responsible both nationally and internationally to bear the
burden of cancellation. This guide compiles arguments and evidence to chal-
lenge debt repayment.
• While banks and other financial institutions are responsible for countries’ in-
debtedness and have helped create the crisis, at the same time they have profi-
teered from it in numerous ways, such as betting against countries’ default, and
then benefiting from the latter’s bailouts.
• Future profitability is ensured by reorganising the institutional landscape to
promote private corporate business opportunities. This report shows who is
profiting from the crisis and reveals how and why grassroots mobilisations are
rising up against the European establishment. This guide argues for opposition
to the EU that is not based on discrimination or prejudice, to reclaim the space
that has so far been dominated by far right movements.
• The crisis has cast aside any pretence of democracy; the kind of changes insti-
tuted are only possible with broad, general use of force, violence and appeals to
nationalism and xenophobia. The guide documents the far reaching impacts of
austerity politics and presents the main social, economic and political arguments
to counter it.
Invention Of Capitalism or the Reinvention of Capitalism, Distributism?
Usury as the provoction for destructive growth and Monopoly, The Money Syndrome.
Owen Jones.
One of the chairs of the left-wing Labour campaign group Momentum has quit her post and the party over Sir Keir Starmer's policy agenda, and his "disgusting response" to the war in Gaza.
Hilary Schan, who is also a councillor in Worthing, said she will now join the We Deserve Better campaign, headed by journalist Owen Jones, which aims to oust prominent Labour MPs at the next election and put independent and Green Party candidates in their place.
The announcement comes off the back of a widely successful local election campaign for Labour, but one where it suffered losses in its traditional council seats, especially in areas with large Muslim populations, over its stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict.
https://labourlist.org/2024/03/owen-jones-labour-we-deserve-better-socialist-progressive/
The group is raising money to kickstart a campaign fund, which will be used to back “socialist candidates”, regardless of party affiliation, in order to support “transformative policies”.These include “taxing the rich to fund public services, backing public ownership, tackling the climate crisis and opposing war crimes in Gaza”.
It claims this is “safe in the knowledge that there’s no risk of the Tories getting back into government”.
While the group acknowledges that might mean supporting “socialist” Labour MPs in some areas, the website also specifically says it will campaign against two members of the shadow cabinet, namely Thangam Debbonaire in Bristol Central and Wes Streeting in Ilford North by backing Green candidate Carla Denyer and British-Palestinian independent candidate Leanne Mohamad respectively.
Labour Party rules, tightened last year to ensure they cover support for rival candidates as well as rival parties, suggest members risk expulsion for “providing financial support or assistance to, or otherwise supporting the campaign of an individual that stands in opposition to, or declares an intention to stand in opposition to, a Labour Party candidate”.
Also banned is “possessing membership of, providing financial assistance to, sitting on the ruling body of or otherwise supporting (as may be defined by the national executive committee) any political organisation that the NEC in its absolute discretion shall declare to be inimical with the aims and values of the party”.
Candidates we support
Thousands of people have already joined our movement and together we’ve created a campaign fund to support candidates who are part of the alternative, which has given thousands of pounds to:
Leanne Mohamad to unseat Wes Streeting in Ilford North
Carla Denyer to unseat Thangam Debbonaire in Bristol Central
Jamie Driscoll for North East Mayor - Jamie’s factional purge by Labour’s leadership means he has to raise all his own funds as an independent candidate even though he’s the popular incumbent who’s created jobs, invested in local community projects, tackled child poverty and delivered an £18 billion Green New Deal fund.
If you live in or you’re able to travel to the North East before or on election day on 2 May, join the leafleting group and sign up here for information about campaigning for Jamie.
We’re discussing with campaign teams how different candidates can be best supported and some candidates haven’t officially announced yet. More information coming soon!
Our committee
An election could be called at any moment, and we need to be ready. Our committee of experienced figures from across the trade union, climate, Palestine solidarity and anti-war movements will oversee the support for Green and left-wing independent candidates in key seats as well as socialist Labour MPs.
Fatima-Zahra Ibrahim, Co-ED of Green New Deal Rising, a youth movement fighting for a transformation of the economy to stop the climate crisis and build a world in which we can thrive.
Amna Abdullatif, independent councillor for Ardwick, Central Manchester and the first Arab Muslim woman elected to Manchester City Council. Amna was elected as a Labour councillor but resigned from the Party in October 2023 saying she had been left with “no choice other than to resign” due to “Keir Starmer and a number of his senior frontbench making horrifying comments about Israel having the right to withhold fuel, water, food and electricity from the 2.2 million Palestinians trapped in Gaza, effectively endorsing a war crime”
https://workerspartybritain.org/manifesto-britain-deserves-better/
The Workers Party of Britain:
is committed to the redistribution of wealth and power in favour of working people.
is committed to a reversal of policies aimed at deindustrialisation & to exploring innovative demands for workers control and participation in the future of industry through our trade unions.
supports the call for a Net Zero Referendum as soon as possible to create a national debate on who profits from these targets and on what terms. We will oppose ULEZ initiatives because of the costs they impose on working households and small businesses.
promises to undertake a major review of pensions policy with the ultimate aim of restoring a life-long commitment through earnings to adequate pension provision with all workers having the option of retiring at 60.
will legislate to support workers and managers in the acquisition of productive enterprises and their assets that otherwise would be closed or distributed to shareholders where the company is either intended to be sold to a foreign owner or to be closed in order to export production overseas.
supports campaigning to preserve the right to use cash. We are not Luddites when it comes to digital currency and fintech – our demand, however, is that this and other technologies, including blockchain and artificial intelligence, are under sufficient community control to ensure positive social and economic outcomes for the working class and the vulnerable.
will immediately increase the personal tax threshold for the poorest paid, removing tax entirely from the first £21,200 of wages for two million low-paid workers, and at the same time we commit to a one-off wealth tax on all estates valued fairly at over £10 million to make a start on redressing the colossal gap between the wealthiest 1% and the rest of the population.
will ensure working class representation throughout the governance of the Bank of England.
will fully renationalise the NHS and commit to significant spending on social and economic infrastructure and implement major efficiency savings.
will take a decisive role in the pharmaceuticals industry on which our NHS depends. An entirely private pharmaceuticals industry is inimical alongside a public health system. Without close monitoring and significant control, it offers a recipe for profiteering at best and dangerous malpractice at worst.
will support Britain’s children by committing to free public travel arrangements, mirroring those that currently exist for children in London by offering them to the rest of the country. Furthermore, we will support the provision of free good quality and nutritious breakfast and lunch meals during term time to all children in school without means testing.
by committing to a review of policing priorities, will support a refocus on street safety and estate crime as an antidote to policing by Twitter and criminalising speech and thought.
makes no apology for our support for Palestine and the people of Gaza during the current brutal onslaught which has been enabled by Labour and Tories alike. We call for a single state in which all those born in Palestine-Israel can live in peace with equal rights.
is committed to offering a long term and well organised socialist alternative to the corrupt Labour Party, which is now nothing more than a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
will undertake a thoroughgoing review of our defence and foreign policy.
is calling for a referendum on membership of NATO with a view to a national debate on all our collective security arrangements. Our own position is clear – under current circumstances, we will continue to campaign for Britain to leave NATO as a clear and present danger to the security of the British population and seek new collective security arrangements centred on the protection of peoples and not of states or industries.
… and we offer so much more than this …
Redistributive economics
https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/?s=Distributism
https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/video/capitalism-and-other-kids-stuff/
https://socialistworker.co.uk/news/tory-support-disintegrates-in-local-elections/
The Gaza factor savages Labour in parts of northern England
Labour had a good night in the seats where they compete for office with the Conservatives. But it saw reverses in some of its safest seats—with Palestine a key issue.
As well as the Oldham results, in Tameside, Greater Manchester, independent Kaleel Khan won in Ashton St Peter’s ward which Labour had held for nearly 50 years.
Campaigning strongly on Palestine, he defeated Dave McNally, a Labour councillor for 13 years, chair of planning and local whip by 348 votes.
In Blackburn with Darwen pro-Palestine independent candidates in the 4 BwD group had major successes. In Shear Brow and Corporation Park ward, Labour’s Hussain Akhtar conceded defeat before counting even began. And he was right to do so as Muntazir Patel stormed to victory for 4 BwD with 1,200 more votes than the incumbent.
Councillor Mustafa Desai, who leads the 4 BwD group, said the result was a “great victory”. “People are totally dissatisfied with what has been going on,” he added. “I think the results were a surprise to Labour who I don’t think realised the scale of movement.
“It sends a message to the Labour leadership about people’s concerns about humanitarian issues in Gaza and everywhere. This is not just a Muslim issue.”
In Bradford. West Yorkshire, the issue of Labour’s support for Israel was at the centre of independents’ victories in six wards against Starmer’s party.
In Little Horton ward, independent Talat Sajawal won with 2,755 votes to Labour’s 769. In Toller ward 18 year old Atira Malik had 2,548 votes to Labour’s 1,665.
Independent Ismail Uddin, 19 years old, won in Bradord’s Bowling and Barkerend—and celebrated his win at the Leeds university encampment.
Mohammed Ali Islam, 20 years old, also won. Cheering crowds met the three young victors after the count with Mohammed Ali Islam carried on the shoulders of supporters.
Bradford has a vibrant Palestine movement which helped to create the networks that delivered these successes.
In Bolton, Greater Manchester, Labour lost several seats to independents such as Ayyub Chota Patel in Rumworth who dedicated his win to support for a ceasefire in Gaza.
As he took to the podium, the newly elected councillor Patel said, “This is a win for Palestine. We the people of Rumworth have shown that they believe in a ceasefire.”
Independents also took seats in Kirklees. One of them was Tanisha Bramwell who tweeted, ” The power shifts. We’re not just challenging opponents; We’re challenging the system.”
In Rotherham, South Yorkshire, Taiba Yasseen, a long-time Labour councillor and cabinet member, won as an independent.
It is not just a “Muslim vote” issue. But “On average, Labour’s support is down by eight points since last year in wards where more than 10 percent of people identify as Muslim,” John Curtice told the BBC early on Friday.
On Friday at 12.30pm, Labour was briefing it believed it was on course for defeat in the West Midlands mayoral race, with support for independent candidate Akhmed Yakoob, who stood on a pro-Gaza ticket, a major factor.
The BBC reported a senior party source had disgustingly said, “It’s the Middle East, not West Midlands, that will have won [Conservative candidate] Andy Street the mayoralty. Once again Hamas are the real villains.”
There have been some signs of support for George Galloway’s Workers Party of Britain (WPB).
In Rochdale, where Galloway won a recent by-election, the WPB won two seats, but it lost to Labour in some that it had predicted to win.
The party’s Shahbaz Sarwar also defeated the deputy leader of Manchester city council in Longsight. And in the Park ward in Calderdale, West Yorkshire, ex-Tory Shakir Saghir also won a seat for the WPB.
In Bolton the party’s Omar Shafiq came second in Queens Park and Central ward with 842 votes, Sajid Pathan took 546 votes and came third in Hulton ward.
Quick Take…UK Local Elections Set the Stage for “Change” of Government
The UK ran local and mayoral elections today, and surprise surprise so far it is a big win for Labour.
At the time of writing, the “opposition” has won 3 of the 4 called mayoral elections and wrested control of 8 councils from the Conservatives. The Tories have apparently lost almost 300 council seats so far. This to go along with Labour’s win in the Blackpool South by-election, a seat they haven’t held for decades.
All this is laying the groundwork for the general election coming later this year, one the Tories are expected to lose.
YouGov polls are predicting “the biggest wipeout” since 1997, according to the Telegraph.
It is all narrative, of course.
As we noted in our “Predictions for the Next Pandemic”, they want to clean house and install new political faces before moving ahead with the next steps in the Great Reset.
So expect Labour to win – in fact expect “the opposition” to win most of the elections this year – all around the world. It’s all part of the plan.
Oh, and in case you missed this incredibly cringy piece of fake news, Boris Johnson was allegedly barred from voting for “forgetting his ID”:
See, voting is so fair guys, and the system is so reliable and the rules apply to everyone equally. Honest.
So transparent.
Roger
May 5, 2024 7:37 PM
A must watch
Roger
May 5, 2024 7:45 PM
Reply to Roger
Test.
Stitch up Bastani and Novarra.
https://grubstreetinexile.substack.com/p/introducing-the-most-revolutionary
#FreeAssange.
Unaccustomed as I am to barking at the moon, twatting on Twitter, or indeed suffering fools gladly I have come to a full circle yet again on these present discontents.
Burkes’s Speech, On these present discontents, is as fresh and alive today as it was when he wrote it.
And mercy toward fallen men.
To God and his commands pay Thou good heed, O Muse.
To praise and slander both be nonchalant and cool.
Demand no laureate’s wreath, think nothing of abuse,
And never argue with a fool.
Peter Oborne on British media’s abject failure in its reporting on Jeremy Corbyn
Mon 12 Dec 2022
Peter Oborne: "... and I've felt a little ashamed that I did buy into the narrative about Jeremy Corbyn...I should have been a lot more careful and scrupulous about some of my journalism."
JVL Introduction
Peter Oborne on Doubledown News talks about the Al Jazeera Labour Files series – and the deafening silence of the British media in response to it –the very media who happily dogpiled into the attacks on Jeremy Corbyn while he was leader of the Labour Party.
This article was originally published by Double Down News on Thu 8 Dec 2022. Read the original here.
Peter Oborne DEMOLISHES the Media Silence on The Labour Files
by Peger Oborne, Double Down News
Click here to play the video
And he urges everyone to Join the Future of Journalism ► https://www.patreon.com/DoubleDownNews
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FjaE6BFKHWDi/
“This impeccably-executed film exposes with chilling accuracy the terrifying threat that now confronts democracy, and the depressing intractability of the Israel-Palestine situation.”
Mike Leigh (Peterloo, Mr Turner)
https://witchhuntfilm.org/
#TrueTorahJews #RabbiShapiro https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/2019/03/09/partisan-girl-goes-back-to-school-do-all-celebrities-believ-their-own-bs/ @GnasherJew https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/2018/04/23/deconstrucution-of-gnasherjews-anti-semitism-racism-and-mendacity-labourantisemitism/ Well done Jackie, also do not forget our Comrade Marc Wadsworth similarly marginalised and attaked.
https://electronicintifada.net/tags/lobby-usa
https://www.aljazeera.com/investigations/thelobby/
February 25, 2024
QED POST CLIMATE CHANGE, LAND USE AND MONETARY POLICY, THE NEW TRIFECTA.
CarbonCurrencyEndGame #1930’s the sequel non crime thought crime and the non nazi nazi nazis.
Doubling Back I often find it somewhat more productive than doubling down.
Doubling Down is a form of denial and Doubling Back is a retracing of steps to find where one took a misstep.
Whilst the end of the World is not nigh, the end of the current monetary arrangements is nigh, and also the old social contract is up in flames and withering away as I type this.
This is the Dawning of the new Grub Street in Exile Age of Aquarius, as we shall see the Going Direct Spring 2024 is upon us, and whilst the distractions are many the core issue remains the same. Going Direct is a suicidal pathway to Techno Fascist Feudalism and the common themes of the new “Nobel Lie” revolve around;
I’ve spent the week going around the block sort of recapping so it’s something that when I get the time to do or feel the urge to do I find it quite useful because I think you need to take a longer time context along a timeline as we’ve just discussed before to get a a handle on the direction of travel as sort of a triangulation context, motivation seeing what people’s actions follow words and sometimes those actions can be several years after the words were initially spoken so um going direct as you know is the Black Rock plan put before the pandemic um to deal with the next financial crisis which most people that follow these things agree started in September 2019 with the New York repo Spike well going direct I made a mind map sort of just covering some of the areas with which I’ve studied and blogged about which is climate science Information Technology blockchain um and monetary reform okay now and then the last four years i’ I’ve gone back to my um profession uh of being a property developer now um there’s a brilliant book called um land policy money and climate the new Trifecta CLimate Change , Land Use and Monetary Policy, The New Trifecta. by someone called, I think it’s Geraldine Ryan Perry it’s a brilliant book I’ve got it on Kindle I often read bits of it on the airplane when I’m coming back and forth to Sweden
Land Use and Monetary Policy, The New Trifecta. Click to buy its well worth it.
August 9, 2016
CHAMPAGNE SOCIALISTS FOR CORBYN.
#Champagnesocialist #Bonviveurs4Corbyn #PoshBoys4Corbyn #Socialismcanbe4Toffs2 pic.twitter.com/kVcWbfw3Lu
— Roger Glyndwr Lewis (@RogerGLewis) August 9, 2016
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js The Cutting is from my press cutting book, I am one of the fortunate ones. I recieved a grant aided education in Comprehensive, and for A levels at the Colchester Institute where I went back to take my A Levels after leaving home and having dropped out of sixth form. Incidentally one of my A Level Law Lecturers was Mike O´Brien a Junior Home office minister in the naughties New Labour Government, but at that time 1982, was a Law Lecturer at The Colchester Institute. But thats another story.
Green Party Manifesto 2015 Policy EC663
EC663 The existing banking system has failed and is no longer fit for purpose. The Green Party believes that the power to create money must be removed from private banks. The supply of our national currency must be fully restored to democratic and public control so that it can be issued free of debt and directed to environmentally and socially beneficial areas such as renewable energy, social housing, or support for community businesses.
9. Creating ‘Common Wealth’: Work, Money, Industry and Tax................................45
Work............................................................................................................................................................................................45
Finance........................................................................................................................................................................................46
Changing economic organisations................................................................................................................................................48
Small firms and the local economy ..............................................................................................................................................48
Taxes...........................................................................................................................................................................................49
Regaining control of our money
One of the most fundamental tasks of government is maintenance of the currency. Without stable money accepted by all we can’t buy and sell things or plan for the future. Inflation in particular makes it hard to take the long-term view that the environmental crisis demands.
Most people believe that our money is currently created by the nationalised Bank of England. It isn’t. A pound in your bank account is no more than a promise by the bank to pay you that pound; you don’t actually own any publicly created money. In fact, commercial banks create new money (in the sense of money in bank accounts) whenever they make loans, and that money disappears when the loan is paid back. The fact that the size of our money supply – the total amount of money in circulation – is dependent upon millions of separate commercial lending decisions by banks makes it hard to maintain economic stability.
During the great recession of the past few years, the unwillingness of banks to make new loans and the desire of people to pay down their debts has meant that the money supply has shrunk, and the government has had to resort to the emergency policy of printing money (called ‘quantitative easing’) to prevent an even worse slump. We believe that the time has come to recognise that the creation of currency and the control of the money supply is far too important to be left to profit-seeking private sector banks and should be brought back under the democratic control of the state.
Quantitative easing was but a first step. Commercial banks should be no more than the custodians of publicly created money in current accounts, and the creation of that money should become the function of a new monetary authority, independent of day-today government control.
This policy would protect ordinary bank accounts, and • allow banks to fail safely • separate ordinary and investment business • provide some control on overall lending and debt This would be a massive and complex change to our banking system, with many ramifications, and its implementation, involving many years of consultation, legislation and the creation of transitional arrangements, would not be appropriate for one Parliament. But we would take the first steps of preparing detailed proposals and consulting upon them, and Green MPs will press this issue in the next Parliament. The change to the new system would create a new and substantial cash flow for the government, which could be spent on social and environmental priorities and assist in paying down the national debt.
November 28, 2019
JEREMY CORBYN, THE HUMAN 9/11, A RETROSPECTIVE. WOULD THE REAL JEREMY CORBYN PLEASE STAND UP. BRITISH FAIRPLAY? STALKING HORSES, SHOW PONIES AND GROOMS OF TINA’S STOOLS.#TWOFINGERS2BRINO @WIKI_BALLOT #4PAMPHLETEERS @GRUBSTREETJORNO @SURVATION @WIKI_BALLOT @FINANCIALEYES #WIKIBALLOTPICK #IABATO #SAM #GE2019 ROGER LEWIS ( PORTHOS) @JOEBLOB20 #NHS #WASPI
British fair play used to be a standard all Britons felt they could be measured by. Letting someone speak for themselves, a right to reply and the presumption of innocence all, defined the British sense of fair play, more so than the Stiff Upper Lip or, any other cultural stereotype. The most universal cultural ideal up for “Cultural appropriation” would arguably be the British Sense of Fairplay, followed by irony and self-effacement.
So what are we to make of the “Corbin” turn in our discourse about The leader of her majesties loyal opposition.
Following headlines screaming Corbyn car crash interview on Andrew Neal and other breathless condemnations in line with the Corbin Headlined litany of betrayals and Calumnies of this rather self-effacing Geography teacheresque pin-up.
Paxman took the laurels in 2017 for me describing Theresa May as a Colouring in Graduate and Corbyn as a moth-eaten Geography teacher, its an image once imagined, that is hard to remove.
In a recent interview, Jeremy Corbyn, the former leader of the Labour Party, discussed a wide range of topics including his views on government, economics, social issues, and international relations. His responses shed light on his political stance and vision for the future. Here's a summary of the key points from the interview.
Government and Political Ideology
Corbyn expressed his commitment to working towards a Labour majority government. However, he also acknowledged the possibility of a minority government, in which case he emphasized the importance of working with other parties to achieve common goals. He highlighted the need for a more inclusive approach to governance, taking into account the diverse ideological spectrum within the Labour Party.
Party Affiliation
When questioned about his alignment with the Labour Party given his differing views from past party leaders, Corbyn reaffirmed his commitment to the party's core values and its historical significance. He emphasized the importance of advocating for change from within the party rather than seeking an alternative political affiliation.
Electoral Representation and Constitutional Reform
Corbyn addressed the issue of electoral representation and proposed reforms to the existing system. He advocated for a more proportional representation system and emphasized the need for a constitutional convention to address electoral representation, voting rights, and regional governance.
Migration Crisis
Corbyn expressed concern about the migrant crisis, particularly in the Mediterranean region. He stressed the need for a humanitarian response and proposed initiatives to support refugees and address the root causes of migration. He criticized the approach of offshoring migrants and emphasized the importance of offering safe havens and promoting stability in affected regions.
Immigration Detention Centers
Corbyn voiced his reservations about immigration detention centers and expressed his desire to phase them out. He highlighted concerns about the treatment of migrants and emphasized the need for a more humane approach to immigration policies.
Police Reform and Social Justice
Corbyn addressed issues of racial profiling in policing and emphasized the need for better training and oversight to address systemic racism within law enforcement. He also highlighted the importance of community policing initiatives in fostering positive relationships between law enforcement and local communities.
Economic Policy and Environmental Sustainability
Corbyn outlined his economic policy, emphasizing the need for greater equality and addressing tax loopholes and evasion. He also stressed the importance of environmental sustainability and proposed measures to promote growth without compromising ecological considerations.
Gender Equality and Care Work
Corbyn highlighted the issue of everyday sexism and gender discrimination, emphasizing the need for legislative measures to address these issues. He also advocated for recognizing and valuing unpaid care work, particularly by women, and proposed measures to support caregivers.
International Relations and Economic Strategy
Corbyn addressed concerns about economic strategy in a globalized economy, emphasizing the need for accountability of global corporations and regulatory measures to ensure fair economic policies. He also discussed the challenges faced by leaders such as François Mitterrand and Alexis Tsipras in implementing economic reforms.
In conclusion, Jeremy Corbyn's interview shed light on his vision for governance, social justice, economic policy, and international relations. His responses reflected a commitment to progressive values and a comprehensive approach to addressing complex societal challenges. As a political figure, Corbyn's perspectives provide valuable insights into contemporary political discourse and policy considerations.
April 29, 2015
BRAND MILLIBAND INTERVIEW. BRANDS STRANGE LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE?
Media Lens state that they felöt Russel Brand caved in on his questions to easily giving away to Millibands rhetoric. I personally saw a lack of self confidence which is a shame as I say below I think Russel Brand has the intellectual apparatus to debate these issues in greater depth.
Brevity really is the enemy of understanding.´´ If you want to say something that questions the religion( Ruling Paradigm), you’re expected to give evidence, and that you can’t do between two commercials. So therefore you lack concision, so therefore you can’t talk.´´—Noam Chomsky, Conversations with History Institute of International Studies, University of Berkely.
Brave effort Russel and Milliband, but a longer interview is needed to pin down what he stands for and what the questions and problems are. More of a benefit to Milliband I would have thought and generates rather more heat than light.
I think Russel is capable of following through on the questions but to me seems to lack confidence in his own intellectual depth and this seems to be holding him back. Might sound strange to say a narcissist lacks self confidence but if with knowledge certainty decreases it is consistent with the learning curve Russel has clearly been on. For me personally I think its worth cutting Russel some slack and offering support and encouragement I think he has what it takes to kick these issues around and Pin TPTB down on issues. His interview with Owen Jones is quite good actually.
I. Introduction
A. Overview of the Interview
B. Purpose of the Discussion
C. Key Points Covered
II. Background of the Interviewee
A. Introduction to Ed Miliband
B. Political Career and Affiliations
C. Relevance to Current Political Landscape
III. Discussion on Political Engagement
A. Perception of Unelected Powerful Elites
B. Frustration and Apathy in Politics
C. Historical Context of Political Change
D. Role of Politics and People in Driving Change
IV. Addressing Powerful Forces
A. Banking Sector Reforms
B. Confronting Tax Avoidance and Fraud
C. Ensuring Accountability and Fairness
D. Role of Government and Political Will
V. Media Ownership and Influence
A. Concerns about Media Power
B. Regulatory Measures and Manifesto Pledges
C. Balancing Media Influence with Public Interest
VI. Economic Inequality and Social Impact
A. Vision for a More Equal Society
B. Addressing Working People's Concerns
C. Tackling Housing Crisis and Financial Sector Influence
VII. Conclusion
A. Summary of Key Points
B. Call for Political Engagement and Change
C. Reflection on the Interview Experience
—
February 3, 2019
MONBIOT, ATTENBOROUGH, AND GRETA THUNBERG
MONBIOT, ATTENBOROUGH, AND GRETA THUNBERG
03/02/2019 · by Clive Lord · Bookmark the permalink. ·
I have just read an article by George Monbiot dismissing the Tragedy of the Commons because it is used to justify privatization. He has been misled by this specious use of the Tragedy. All Hardin actually proposes in his classic essay on the topic is ‘mutual coercion mutually agreed upon’, which is exactly what must happen.
Hi Clive,
Monbiot is controlled opposition, a gatekeeper.
The apparent infection in the Mainstream media by the plants of various Mockingbird initiatives dating back to the cold war is more prevalent now than they have ever been.
I happen to think that both the Tragedy of the commons and also the Significance of Anthropogenic Carbon emissions is overstated and as a distraction from the Environmental despoilation and Infinite growth paradigm on a finite planet.
WHilst I disagree with you on the details You and I are on the same side, whilst Monbiot might agree with some of our positions it is important to understand that he speaks for an unspoken un-propagandised agenda
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XikjAJ4yeLXv/
That Agenda, Agenda 21, might well be one you and I are in opposing camps on.
As with most agendas, they have been corrupted over time,
Quilligans work I find most enlightening and the Brant report on which he worked is a solid and compelling piece of work,
https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/2018/06/18/james-b-quilligan-the-brandt-report-the-brandt-equation-the-financial-commons-and-blockchain/
https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/2018/06/18/free-software-the-commons-free-money-and-liberty-v-tyranny-tyranny-of-the-geek-web-3/
This film by Grignon takes your position on CO2, whilst I think that part is falsified, to my own satisfaction but not that of others his other work on Money as debt is compelling
http://paulgrignon.netfirms.com/MoneyasDebt/sitemap.htm
Regarding neo-CLassical neo-liberal economics and ideology ( it is fascism and fascism as we know it, Clive)
Here is some interesting work and discussion I am currently involved with.
https://www.scribd.com/document/284513941/Ecological-Complexity#fullscreen&from_embed
I hope you are well I read your columns often but rarely comment, Today I reached out to let you know I am listening and take seriously what you say, even though I disagree with some of it.
Internet censorship is about to go warp speed Clive you should consider getting onto the Steemit platform
https://steemit.com/@tonefreqhz
