Droit du seigneur without Noblesse oblige
On Evidence based policy making. 18 Apr 2019
We discuss “Artificial intelligence” which should properly be called “machine processing” It is ironic that this post over 5 years later is largely generated by chat GPT.
Instruction, Take the following input and write an epistle in the style of Alexander Popes the Dunciad?
Go, soar with Plato to th’ empyreal sphere,
To the first good, first perfect, and first fair;
Or tread the mazy round his follow’rs trod,
And quitting sense call imitating God;
As Eastern priests in giddy circles run,
And turn their heads to imitate the Sun.
Go, teach Eternal Wisdom how to rule—
Then drop into thyself, and be a fool![9]— Epistle II, lines 1-30
In the above example, Pope’s thesis is that man has learnt about nature and God’s creation through science; consequently, science has given man power, but having become intoxicated by this power, man has begun to think that he is “imitating God”. In response, Pope declares the species of man to be a “fool”, absent of knowledge and plagued by “ignorance” in spite of all the progress achieved through science. Pope argues that humanity should make a study of itself, and not debase the spiritual essence of the world with earthly science, since the two are diametrically opposed to one another: man should “presume not God to scan”.
I’ve seen the future of AI art(Poetry) – and it’s terrifying (Absurd)
Amidst the homage to "The Dunciad", a stirring quest unfolds,
Exploring Extinction Rebellion with Roger Lewis bold.
The cryptic discourse weaves skepticism and dissent,
Revolving around suspicions that leave minds fervently bent.
Doubts arise, casting shadows on the green finance alight,
A puzzling image of Greta Thunberg emerges in the night.
Whispers of Graeber's ties to the CIA ripple through,
Stirring unease, unraveling an intricate view.
Geopolitical nuances transform the narrative's course,
As Left critiques and NGO entanglements add force.
Energy's pivotal role in shaping a sustainable sphere,
Fuels the dialogue, emphasizing what's held dear.
AI's encroachment on old choices and free thought dire,
Weaves a tale of control, sparking concerns growing higher.
Systemic influences molding billionaires to take form,
Adds layers of inquiry, demanding reform.
Where inclusion falters and backgrounds obscure the sight,
The need for scrutiny grows, shedding much-needed light.
Amidst complexities, skepticism's lens ever clear,
Peers beyond the veils, guiding forth without fear.
Thus concludes a verse on a tale woven deep,
Where depth of inquiry carves paths that we must keep.
Based on the user's input, it seems like a detailed summary of a conversation about Extinction Rebellion with Roger Lewis. The conversation covers various concerns and suspicions about the movement, including potential co-optation by the financial industry, manipulation of Greta Thunberg's image, suspicions about David Graeber's connections to the CIA, criticism from the Left, the importance of energy in creating a sustainable world, the impact of artificial intelligence and algorithms on individual agency, the manufactured nature of billionaires, criticism of individuals involved in Extinction Rebellion, and the need to investigate the motives and background of organizations and individuals involved in opposition movements. The speaker also discusses the EU as a European imperialist enterprise and the predominance of white individuals in Extinction Rebellion. The conversation delves into a range of topics related to environmental activism, social movements, and societal dynamics.
This video is a conversation with Roger Lewis about Extinction Rebellion, discussing concerns of co-optation and the potential use of the movement for green finance marketing. They also touch on the connections between Greta Thunberg, Al Gore, and the establishment, as well as the role of the EU and the need for energy sustainability. The conversation explores various topics such as individual agency, billionaires, and the racial demographics of the movement.
Detailed Summary for [chat with roger lewis about extinction rebellion](
by [Monica](https://monica.im)
[00:02](
The speaker discusses concerns about Extinction Rebellion being co-opted by the financial industry and the potential manipulation of Greta Thunberg's image.
- Extinction Rebellion may be used as a marketing tool for green finance.
- Greta Thunberg's image has been associated with influential figures and organizations.
- There are concerns about the manipulation of the climate change narrative and a potential eugenics subtext.
[09:36](
The speaker discusses suspicions about David Graeber's connections to the CIA and questions the establishment's embrace of Extinction Rebellion.
- The speaker mentions suspicions about David Graeber's connections to the CIA and his presence at Extinction Rebellion events.
- There are concerns about the CIA infiltrating radical groups like animal rights campaigners and anti-fracking groups.
- Extinction Rebellion seems to have received support from the establishment, which is unusual for an anti-establishment group.
- The speaker also mentions a Sky appearance by an Extinction Rebellion representative and comments on the background of the interviewer.
[19:02](
The speaker discusses the EU as a European imperialist enterprise and mentions criticism of Extinction Rebellion from the Left.
- The EU is presented as a pro-US, anti-African, anti-Asian, anti-Russian corporate enterprise.
- The speaker suggests that calling the EU the "Fourth Reich" or "Fifth Reich" is not too strong.
- The conversation touches on the Assange story and Greta Thunberg in Sweden.
- There is a mention of NGOs talking to Extinction Rebellion and the claim that NGOs have copied their tactics.
[28:40](
The importance of energy in creating a sustainable world for the growing population.
- Our way of life depends on surplus energy.
- To create a good home for everyone, we need to harness energy, clean water, and technology.
- Fossil fuels currently provide the majority of our energy needs.
- CO2 levels need to be kept below 280 parts per million for a healthy ecosystem.
[38:11](
The speaker discusses the impact of artificial intelligence and algorithms on individual agency and freedom of choice.
- Assumptions within algorithms dictate what is right and wrong, limiting individual decision-making.
- The state aims for a manual override switch to override individual agency.
- The concept of free will has historically challenged despots.
- A book from the 1950s criticized psychiatry for discouraging individuality and promoting conformity.
[47:50](
Billionaires would not exist without the current financial system and rigging of commerce internationally.
- The idea that billionaires are a naturally occurring phenomenon is not true.
- The rise in the number of billionaires is manufactured, just like everything else.
- Extinction Rebellion is no less manufactured than other brands.
- It is unclear who is funding and supporting Extinction Rebellion.
[57:20](
The speaker criticizes certain individuals involved in Extinction Rebellion and questions why the movement is predominantly white.
- The speaker mentions Professor Jim Bendell and Dr. Rupert Reed as individuals involved in Extinction Rebellion.
- They criticize the published papers of these individuals and imply they are not of high quality.
- The speaker expresses discomfort with a Green Party meeting they attended and describes Extinction Rebellion as feeling like a cult.
- They question why Extinction Rebellion is predominantly white and express their interest in the matter.
[01:06:56](
The speaker discusses the need to investigate the motives and background of organizations and individuals involved in opposition movements.
- Control opposition infiltrates movements to create cover stories and go into deep cover.
- It is important to check the background and funding sources of organizations and individuals claiming to be against something.
- The speaker mentions Caroline Lucas and urges people to look into her declared interests and investments.
- The speaker also talks about his experience with a cameraman who was only interested in filming protests, rather than discussing the implications of corporate power.
18 Apr 2019
Researcher Roger Lewis discusses energy and co-opting of protest with Ranjan Balakumaran
In recent times, there has been a surge in public demonstrations and movements aimed at addressing environmental concerns. One such movement that has gained significant attention is Extinction Rebellion. This movement has garnered the appearance of widespread support and participation, but it has also faced criticism and skepticism from various quarters.
The central theme of Extinction Rebellion is to raise awareness about environmental issues, particularly climate change, and to demand urgent action from governments and other stakeholders. However, there are concerns about the potential co-optation of the movement and its underlying motives.
One of the primary concerns raised about Extinction Rebellion is the possibility of it being co-opted for marketing purposes, particularly in the realm of green finance. There are apprehensions that the movement may be used as a tool to promote green investment opportunities, such as pension funds and ETFs for Millennials inheriting wealth from previous generations. This has led to questions about the true intentions and impact of Extinction Rebellion.
Another area of concern is the association of prominent figures with the movement, such as Greta Thunberg and her climate strike being hijacked by Extinction Rebellion. There have been discussions about the potential influence of certain individuals and organizations within the movement, raising questions about their motives and agenda.
Furthermore, there are apprehensions about the role of large NGOs in shaping and influencing Extinction Rebellion. It has been suggested that certain green NGOs may have a significant influence on the movement, leading to questions about their true intentions and the impact on the movement's goals and objectives.
The issue of greenwashing has also been raised in connection with Extinction Rebellion. There are concerns that certain entities may use the movement as a means to project an environmentally friendly image while engaging in activities that may not align with the true spirit of environmental conservation.
In addition to these concerns, there have been discussions about the potential cult-like behavior within Extinction Rebellion, including reports of hierarchical structures and disciplinary measures within the movement. These reports have raised questions about the internal dynamics and governance of Extinction Rebellion.
Amidst these concerns and criticisms, it is essential to maintain a balanced perspective on the role and impact of movements like Extinction Rebellion. While there may be valid concerns about co-optation, influence, and internal dynamics, it is also important to acknowledge the genuine passion and commitment of individuals involved in the movement.
At its core, Extinction Rebellion aims to address critical environmental issues and advocate for urgent action to mitigate climate change. The movement has succeeded in raising awareness and mobilizing support for environmental causes on a global scale. It has sparked important conversations and debates about the future of our planet and the need for collective action.
As with any social movement, it is crucial to critically evaluate its objectives, strategies, and impact. This includes examining the potential influence of external entities, addressing internal governance issues, and ensuring transparency in decision-making processes.
Moving forward, it is imperative for movements like Extinction Rebellion to maintain a clear focus on their core objectives while remaining vigilant against external influences that may detract from their mission. Open dialogue, transparency, and accountability are essential for ensuring the integrity and effectiveness of such movements.
In conclusion, while there are legitimate concerns and criticisms surrounding Extinction Rebellion, it is crucial to recognize the significance of its advocacy for environmental conservation. By addressing internal governance issues, remaining vigilant against co-optation, and fostering open dialogue, movements like Extinction Rebellion can continue to play a pivotal role in raising awareness and driving meaningful change for our planet's future.
Title: The Illusion of Choice and the Manufactured Nature of Extinction Rebellion
In recent times, there has been a growing discussion about the rise of billionaires and their influence on various aspects of society. The idea that billionaires are a naturally occurring phenomenon has been challenged, with arguments suggesting that their existence is a result of the current financial system and government structures. This notion is particularly relevant when considering the emergence of movements like Extinction Rebellion, which claim to be grassroots but may have underlying influences that are not immediately apparent.
The concept of billionaires as a natural occurrence is debunked by the assertion that their existence is tied to the rigging of commerce and international systems. The exponential increase in the number of billionaires is not simply a result of newfound entrepreneurial prowess, but rather a manufactured outcome. This perspective paints billionaires as modern-day feudal lords, presiding over vast domains that transcend national boundaries. The comparison to feudalism sheds light on the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, albeit in a contemporary context.
The discussion then shifts to Extinction Rebellion, a movement that purports to be a genuine response to climate change and environmental concerns. However, skepticism arises regarding the authenticity of the movement, as it is likened to other manufactured brands. The notion of choice is called into question, as it is suggested that Extinction Rebellion may not be as organic as it presents itself to be.
The movement's stance on various issues, such as Brexit, is highlighted as a point of ambiguity. The lack of clarity on fundamental positions raises concerns about the true motives and affiliations of Extinction Rebellion. The comparison to a "Chinese takeaway" alludes to the lack of substantive content and the need for repeated engagement to grasp the essence of the movement's message.
The discourse then delves into the communication strategies employed by climate change activists. It is suggested that the emphasis on beliefs and emotions serves as a deliberate tactic to avoid engaging with the complexities of climate science. This approach is likened to a cult-like religious fervor, where emotional appeals take precedence over empirical evidence. The aversion to scientific discourse is attributed to the desire to foster a belief system rather than engage in evidence-based policymaking.
The conversation then shifts towards the figureheads of Extinction Rebellion, particularly Roger Hallam. His rhetoric and actions are scrutinized, with an emphasis on his declaration of a "war on climate change." The abstract nature of such declarations is critiqued, as it lacks specificity and fails to address the complexity of climate issues. The comparison to George W. Bush's "war on terror" draws attention to the nebulous nature of such proclamations.
The discussion then touches upon the demographic composition of Extinction Rebellion and the environmental movement at large. The predominance of white participants is noted, raising questions about inclusivity and representation within the movement. The observation that people of color may not see themselves reflected in the environmental movement due to various barriers is highlighted as a point of concern.
The discourse then takes an introspective turn, with insights into the personal experiences and reflections of the author. The revelation about the author's previous wealth and subsequent financial challenges adds a personal dimension to the narrative. This disclosure serves to underscore the disparities in wealth and privilege, shedding light on the complexities of socioeconomic status and its impact on individual perceptions.
The narrative then delves into the intricacies of wealth distribution and its implications for societal dynamics. The concentration of wealth at the upper echelons is juxtaposed with the struggles faced by individuals who have not experienced affluence. The disparities in financial understanding and lived experiences are highlighted as contributing factors to societal divisions.
The discourse then returns to the overarching theme of manufactured narratives and controlled opposition within movements like Extinction Rebellion. The assertion that these movements may serve as conduits for vested interests is posited, raising questions about their authenticity and independence. The role of financial backers and business partnerships in shaping the trajectory of such movements is scrutinized, shedding light on potential ulterior motives.
The narrative then concludes with a call for critical thinking and discernment when engaging with movements like Extinction Rebellion. The importance of questioning narratives, understanding underlying influences, and advocating for transparency is underscored. The need for genuine grassroots movements that prioritize inclusivity, evidence-based discourse, and autonomy is emphasized as essential for fostering meaningful societal change.
In conclusion, the discourse on billionaires, manufactured movements, and societal dynamics offers a thought-provoking exploration of contemporary issues. It invites readers to critically examine prevailing narratives and encourages an informed approach to engaging with social movements and broader societal trends.
Overall, the narrative provides valuable insights into the complexities of wealth distribution, social movements, and individual experiences within the broader context of societal dynamics. It serves as a catalyst for deeper reflection and critical inquiry into the multifaceted nature of contemporary issues.
April 17, 2020
THE DUNCIAD,(MORE POPE, LESS VATICAN VENALITY) MADNESS OF CROWDS #COVIDPURPOSE #PLANDEMIC OF DULL AND VENAL A NEW WORLD TO MOULD, AND BRING SATURNIAN DAYS OF LEAD AND GOLD. “MONKS ´´SANS HUMILITE´´ FANE EASE LIKE POPE WE FIND OUR ACTORS ´´ALL, ALL ALIKE, FIND REASON ON THEIR SIDE´´ @CATHERINEBADIN @FINANCIALEYES @JOEBLOB20 #COVIDPURPOSE @CLARKEMICAH #CONQUESTOFDOUGH @WIKI_BALLOT @LUKEWRIGHTPOET
A heroes pride found in Britannia’s isles
Monks ´´sans humilite´´ fane ease
´´All, all alike, find reason on their side´´
mais par impatience de souffrir
On the present discontents, Burke opined
Now flamed the dog-star's unpropitious ray,
Smote every brain, and wither'd every bay; 10
Sick was the sun, the owl forsook his bower,
The moon-struck prophet felt the madding hour:
Then rose the seed of Chaos, and of Night,
To blot out order, and extinguish light,
Of dull and venal a new world to mould,
And bring Saturnian days of lead and gold.BOOK THE FOURTH.
ARGUMENT.line 10.
the mock-hero should have “Vanity, Impudence, and Debauchery”. As a wise man knows without being told, Pope says, so the vain man listens to no opinion but his own, and Pope quotes Cibber as saying, “Let the world… impute to me what Folly or weakness they please; but till Wisdom can give me something that will make me more heartily happy, I am content to be gazed at“.[26]
Some Dæmon stole my pen (forgive th’ offense)
And once betray’d me into common sense:
Else all my Prose and Verse were much the same;
This, prose on stilts; that, poetry fall’n lame (I 187–190[30])
‘Twas chatt’ring, grinning, mouthing, jabb’ring all,
And Noise, and Norton, Brangling, and Breval,
Dennis and Dissonance; and captious Art,
And Snip-snap short, and Interruption smart.
‘Hold (cry’d the Queen) A Catcall each shall win,
Equal your merits! equal is your din! (II 229–234[11])
THE DUNCIAD:234 BOOK THE FIRST. TO DR JONATHAN SWIFT.
ARGUMENT.
The proposition, the invocation, and the inscription. Then the original of the great empire of Dulness, and cause of the continuance thereof. The college of the goddess in the city, with her private academy for poets in particular; the governors of it, and the four cardinal virtues. Then the poem hastes into the midst of things, presenting her, on the evening of a Lord Mayor’s day, revolving the long succession of her sons, and the glories past and to come. She fixes her eye on Bayes to be the instrument of that great event which is the subject of the poem. He is described pensive among his books, giving up the cause, and apprehending the period of her empire: after debating whether to betake himself to the Church, or to gaming, or to party-writing, he raises an altar of proper books, and (making first his solemn prayer and declaration) purposes thereon to sacrifice all his unsuccessful writings. As the pile is kindled, the goddess, beholding the flame from her seat, flies and puts it out by casting upon it the poem of Thulè. She forthwith reveals herself to him, transports him to her temple, unfolds her arts, and initiates him into her mysteries; then announcing the death of Eusden the poet laureate, anoints him, carries him to court, and proclaims him successor.
THE DUNCIAD
THE DUNCIAD
The Dunciad, poem by Alexander Pope, first published anonymously in three books in 1728; by 1743, when it appeared in its final form, it had grown to four books. Written largely in iambic pentameter, the poem is a masterpiece of mock-heroic verse.
After Pope had edited the works of William Shakespeare to adapt them to 18th-century tastes, the scholar Lewis Theobald attacked him in Shakespeare Restored (1726). Pope responded in 1728 with the first version of his Dunciad, in which Theobald appears as Tibbald, favourite son of the Goddess of Dullness (Dulness), a suitable hero for what Pope considered the reign of pedantry. A year later Pope published The Dunciad Variorum, in which he expanded the poem and added elaborate false footnotes, appendices, errata, and prefaces, as if the Dunciad itself had fallen into the hands of an artless pedant. Both versions, which were published anonymously, are much more than the vengeance of an aggrieved crank, for Pope’s writing exudes facility, wit, and verve.
Pope did not formally acknowledge his authorship of the Dunciad until 1735, when he included it in a volume of his collected works. In 1742 Pope published The New Dunciad, intended as the Dunciad’s fourth book; in it the empire of the Goddess of Dullness has become universal. That same year the poet laureate Colley Cibber savaged Pope in print; Pope responded by revising the Dunciad so as to replace Theobald with Cibber as the work’s dubious hero. The result, The Dunciad in Four Books (1743), drew together, in revised form, the books and critical apparatus of previous versions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colley_Cibber
Colley Cibber (6 November 1671 – 11 December 1757[1]) was an English actor-manager, playwright and Poet Laureate. His colourful memoir Apology for the Life of Colley Cibber (1740) describes his life in a personal, anecdotal and even rambling style. He wrote 25 plays for his own company at Drury Lane, half of which were adapted from various sources, which led Robert Lowe and Alexander Pope, among others, to criticise his “miserable mutilation” of “crucified Molière [and] hapless Shakespeare“. He regarded himself as first and foremost an actor and had great popular success in comical fop parts, while as a tragic actor he was persistent but much ridiculed. Cibber’s brash, extroverted personality did not sit well with his contemporaries, and he was frequently accused of tasteless theatrical productions, shady business methods, and a social and political opportunism that was thought to have gained him the laureateship over far better poets. He rose to ignominious fame when he became the chief target, the head Dunce, of Alexander Pope’s satirical poem The Dunciad.
Cibber’s poetical work was derided in his time, and has been remembered only for being poor. His importance in British theatre history rests on his being one of the first in a long line of actor-managers, on the interest of two of his comedies as documents of evolving early 18th-century taste and ideology, and on the value of his autobiography as a historical source.
April 17, 2020
AN ESSAY ON MAN. #COVIDPURPOSE AND THE MADNESS OF CROWDS. #PLANDEMIC
A TRILOGY IN FOUR PARTS.
USURY HELL´S FUEL MANS OPPRESSOR
BOURGEOIS RESOLUTION AND
GLOBALISATION UN ENTANGLED.
