2025 Bilderberg Memo to Kier Starmer
#Extract #PISS #Blackrock #Shit #PeterThiel #Kier Starmer #Davos Man
The UK's new AI Growth Zones (AIGZs) aim to turn the country into a "global AI superpower" by partnering with tech giants – though critics joke the plan risks becoming a Strategic Hub for Infinite Taxbreaks (SHIT) for firms like BlackRock. Meanwhile, Peter Thiel’s rumored Philanthropic Investment in Surveillance Systems (PISS) initiative, which allegedly links AI ethics to prepper bunker sales, has yet to comment34.
Peter Thiel
VC Founder | Techno-Realist
Keir Starmer’s Davos Engagement
Global vs. Domestic Priorities: At Davos 2023, Starmer emphasized the need for the UK to rebuild its international investment reputation, citing concerns from CEOs about the UK’s declining appeal[Transcript]. He argued that Westminster’s “tribal shouting” contrasts with Davos’ collaborative environment, stating, “Once you get out of Westminster… you actually engage with people you can see working with in the future”[Transcript].
Energy Policy: Starmer advocated for a long-term renewable energy strategy to address high bills, security, and climate goals, while criticizing short-term fixes like energy price caps[Transcript]. Critics have framed this as a pledge to “end oil, gas, and coal,” though his proposals focus on transitioning rather than immediate cessation.
Rishi Sunak’s Absence
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak faced criticism for skipping Davos 2023, with Starmer calling his absence a missed opportunity to address the UK’s “brand damage” among international investors[Transcript].
Satirical Critiques and Public Sentiment
Spitting Image Parodies: Skits mock Starmer’s perceived lack of charisma and Labour’s internal conflicts, such as a fictional exchange where Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves is dubbed the “fiscally irresponsible Nemesis”[Transcript].
Music and Memes: Songs like “Own Nothing - Be Happy” and “TIME LIES - The Great Hear Set” satirize WEF narratives, reflecting skepticism of globalist agendas. Lyrics such as “you’ll have all you need with Central [bank] currency” critique central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)[Transcript].
The “Uni Party” Critique
The term “Uni Party” implies a perceived convergence of Labour and Conservative policies, particularly on economic globalization and climate initiatives. Critics argue this alignment sidelines grassroots concerns, fueling independent voting movements.
Klaus Schwab and the WEF Context
WEF founder Klaus Schwab’s stakeholder capitalism model, which emphasizes corporate social responsibility, has drawn both praise and accusations of elitism. In a 2023 interview, Schwab stated, “This generation expects from a company not just to serve shareholders, but to take care of people and the planet”5.
This intersection of global governance debates and domestic political disillusionment underscores the 2024 election’s framing as a choice between established institutions and alternative movements.
Full 12 Minute movie blocked on Youtube.
Kier Starmer Davos' Man
2024 Election.Same old Same Old Vote Independant. The Uni Party isn't Working! Uni Party Jamboree a White one or a Brown One.
Why does it take so long to build anything in the UK?
You can blame our outdated planning system that's slowing us down.
Around 350,000 planning applications are submitted a year in England, yet the system remains heavily reliant on paper documents — some even hundreds of pages long.
Once submitted, each of these documents needs to be manually validated and approved by a planning officer, taking them hours on end to go through it.
Today we’re announcing a new government-built AI tool called Extract that can process these documents in minutes, freeing up thousands of hours for planning officers to focus on decision-making to speed up housebuilding.
In test trials across Hillingdon, Nuneaton & Bedworth, and Exeter councils, Extract digitised planning records in just three minutes each — compared to the 1 to 2 hours it typically takes manually. That means processing a 100 planning records a day, significantly speeding up the process.
My vision is to fully digitise our planning system — making it faster, more transparent, and easier to navigate for working people.
Through our Plan for Change, we will accelerate house building, improve reliability in the planning process and reduce cost and time for councils, businesses and developers.
It's a bold step forward in our mission to build 1.5 million more homes for working people, and to deliver a planning system fit for the future.
A problem with your comment
Hi Roger,Your comment doesn’t comply with our Professional Community Policies on spam and scams. It’s been removed from LinkedIn and only you can access it.Repeatedly creating content that doesn’t comply with our Professional Community Policies can result in feature access limitations or restrictions to your account.Please visit the notice page about this decision for additional details and resources.
Linkedin, part of the Pay Pal Mafia don’t forget does not approve of this message.!
The UK's new AI Growth Zones (AIGZs) aim to turn the country into a "global AI superpower" by partnering with tech giants – though critics joke the plan risks becoming a Strategic Hub for Infinite Taxbreaks (SHIT) for firms like BlackRock. Meanwhile, Peter Thiel’s rumored Philanthropic Investment in Surveillance Systems (PISS) initiative, which allegedly links AI ethics to prepper bunker sales, has yet to comment34.
Peter Thiel
VC Founder | Techno-Realist
Starmer’s “Extract” AI tool (3-minute document processing[user context]) is textbook “bureaucratic innovation” – digitizing decay rather than dismantling it. Meanwhile, Davos rebrands central planning as SHIT/PISS initiatives, with BlackRock’s ESG machinery (34) poised to monetize public data under “strategic system” euphemisms.
Reality check:
No AI shortcuts 515-day infrastructure delays[user context] or replaces 2,200 missing planners3
BlackRock’s “systematic investing” frameworks (3) ≠ planning reform
Outcome: Extract risks becoming PISS-lite – automating a broken system
Fact-checkers note: While Extract uses public-sector AI, its conceptual overlap with BlackRock’s data-driven portfolios (34) fuels suspicion of blurred public/private agendas. No evidence of direct collaboration exists.
Disruption ≠ digitization.
Views mine. SHIT/PISS acronyms satire.
Memo: Internal Briefing Sent from Grand Hotel Stockholm.
From: Peter Thiel
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: SHIT/PISS Initiative Analysis & Starmer’s “Extract” Gambit
Hi Kier,
Some pointers you might want to talk through with Larry when you see him.
Key Observations:
Davos’ SHIT Initiative (Sustainable Human Infrastructure Taskforce):
Purports to address “systemic inefficiencies” via AI-driven urban planning frameworks.
Bilderberg’s Stockholm sidebar aims to rebrand it under BlackRock’s PISS (Planning Intelligence Strategic System), leveraging ESG capital to monetize public-sector data4.
Core flaw: Relies on the same bureaucratic logic that created the UK’s 515-day Section 106 delays[user context].
Starmer’s “Extract” Tool:
A state-built AI to digitize planning documents (3-minute processing vs. 2 hours manually)[user context].
Critique: Replicates central planning failures. No AI can fix a system requiring 2,200 additional officers3 or resolve NIMBYism codified in law.
Irony: Starmer bypassed Westminster scrutiny for Davos-style “collaboration” rhetoric14, despite skipping the 2025 WEF1.
Strategic Recommendations:
Public Narrative: Mock SHIT/PISS as “elite astroturfing” – a $500M ESG vanity project4.
Private Action: Short UK housing developers; bet against Extract’s scalability given local councils’ 32% approval-rate decline4.
Long Play: Propose a Thiel Foundation “Zoning Override” API to privatize planning via blockchain – bypass committees entirely.
Closing Note:
“Every ‘intelligent’ government AI entrenches the system it claims to fix. The real disruption is abolition.”
End
This memo satirizes bureaucratic tech fetishism and is not an actual policy document.
Stockholm Syndrome. Don't get fooled again
"This secret, internal, and domestic evil not only exists but even overwhelms you before you can foresee it or examine into it."—Against_Verres/Second_pleading/Book_1#39, translated by //en.wikisource.org/wiki/Author:Charles_Duke_Yonge (1903).
Kier Starmer prefers global bankers at Davos 2023 to Westminster. Promises to end oil, gas & coal!
• UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak 'should have... Gone to Davos 2024 Link
• Keir Starmer gets a lesson from Jess Phillips.
Keir Starmer’s Secret Revealed | Spitting Image
• Keir Starmer’s Secret Revealed | Spitting ... Link Not the Ukrainian Rent Boys one.
Own Nothing - Be Happy (feat. Klausi McSch
• Own Nothing - Be Happy (feat. Klausi McSchwabbin') ...
• TIME LIES - The Great Hear Set (feat. Klaui McSchwab)...
🔥
• TIME LIES | Greatest Schwabs Vol. 15 🔥
Fighting for a Free Future. Fighting for a free future. Move over Oligarchy , the Angel of prosperity coming through
A comprehensive argument for Distributism against the Servile State.
Fighting for a Free Future. Fighting for a free future. Move over Oligarchy , the Angel of prosperity coming through
Fighting for a free future Move over Oligarchy , the Angel of prosperity coming through
A comprehensive argument for Distributism against the Servile State.
in response to Steve Baker’s Why we are fighting for a free future.
Abstract Introduction
This integral analysis examines critiques of centralized power structures across economic, managerial, and colonial systems through the lenses of Adrian Wrigley’s fiscal reform proposals (§1), Steve Baker’s anti-managerialism (§2), James Burnham’s The Managerial Revolution (§3), and George Orwell’s Not Counting Niggers (§4). Wrigley’s critique of tax systems serving elite interests (§1.1–1.3) aligns with Baker’s condemnation of technocratic paternalism (§2.1) and Burnham’s prediction of a managerial class supplanting capitalists (§3.1–3.2). Orwell’s exposure of imperial exclusion (§4.1–4.2) extends these critiques to racialized economic exploitation. Together, they reveal how centralized systems—whether fiscal, bureaucratic, or colonial—prioritize elite control at the expense of human dignity, perpetuating what Hilaire Belloc termed the Servile State (Belloc 1912).
The synthesis (§5) identifies technocratic hegemony and moral bankruptcy as shared themes, with Wrigley and Baker proposing decentralizing reforms (§1.4, §2.3) against Burnham’s managerial dystopia (§3.3) and Orwell’s imperial hypocrisy (§4.3). Distributism, rooted in G.K. Chesterton’s vision of widespread property ownership (Chesterton 1926), emerges as a unifying alternative, rejecting both capitalist and socialist centralization in favor of subsidiarity and moral economics (§5.4). This analysis underscores the urgency of systemic reform to dismantle exclusionary power structures and restore agency to individuals and communities.
References
Belloc, H. (1912). The Servile State.
Burnham, J. (1941). The Managerial Revolution.
Chesterton, G.K. (1926). The Outline of Sanity.
Orwell, G. (1939). Not Counting Niggers.
see end note End note Reasoning process for Abstarct.
Why we are Fighting for a Free Future
On elite failure, groupthink and the need for a paradigm shift in political and intellectual life
